I don't think the Bronze Medal Game should really factor in too much in the grading of the players. In any tournament this short and intense, having to play for third place after you've lost a semi final is problematic. You don't play for fifth place. There's no particular reason third should be considered massively more impressive than fourth. It's one thing in sports like cross country skiing or long distance running, but in an ideal world, in tournaments like this, it should be that once the group stage is over, you lose and you're out.
It's also interesting how much the apparent media consensus influences how the players are graded here. I thought Söderström was fine, but I also thought it was pretty apparent he wasn't quite good enough. He's calm and big, but he doesn't track the puck very well, his rebound control was pretty woeful and I think there's a couple of goals he would like to have back. It's like we were so desperate for the water of decent goaltending, after the trek through the desert that was the pre-tournament games against the North Americans, that we drank the sand and didn't even know the difference.
Overall, I thought most of the players were fine. With the exception of perhaps Olofsson and Brodecki, I'd give everyone a passing grade and no one any higher than that. Forsling was beastly on the powerplay but poor defensively, and the same could be said about Nylander, one presumes, if he actually played any defence.