The Gloaming
23
Good good.
Step 1 of my plan. (Torts being fired) is now complete.
Step 2 is buying out Beaver.
Step 1 of my plan. (Torts being fired) is now complete.
Step 2 is buying out Beaver.
Since when is brassard a first line center? I love him, but he's barely a top six center. I'd want him on the third lineWe aren't so bad that we need an upheaval guys.
Look up and down the roster and fill in the spots:
YT?
Line 1(a or b)Zucc-Brassard-Nash
Line 1(a or b)Hags-Stepan-Cally
Line 3 Kreider-Miller-Clowe (only for less then he makes now)
Line 4 Asham-Boyle-Dorsett
If Clowe wants to much plug in Pyatt or a FA, and trade Pyatt
BUYOUT RICHARDS!
McD-Girardi
Staal-Moore (hopefully one can play on the right)
DZ-McIlrath/Stralman
Emminger
King
Biron
Since when is brassard a first line center? I love him, but he's barely a to six center. I'd want him on the third line
Edits above.
Kershaw, take a look at the above....
I'm better than Marc Staal RIGHT NOW since he can't play due to injury. If you are saying that Faulk is better when Marc is healthy, no way.
I'm just curious to know what makes Staal that much better than Faulk.
If they were the same age and were paid the same amount, I'd still much rather have Faulk. RH PMD, elite vision, elite skating ability, good stickwork, confident puck handling skills. Isn't that the Rangers most pressing need? A RH PMD?
this hagelin and brassard talk on 3rd lines is crazy. how many teams have 40-50 pt players over 82 games on a 3rd line?
this hagelin and brassard talk on 3rd lines is crazy. how many teams have 40-50 pt players over 82 games on a 3rd line?
We aren't so bad that we need an upheaval guys.....
A healthy Marc Staal is a top shutdown defenseman in this league. Excellent skater, long reach, physical, smart player. And his offensive abilities are better than average. Faulk as a smaller player relies more on skating and has yet to consistently
Shut down the best forwards in the league like Marc has. Also, and this is a small thing, for such a
Good skater Faulk was bad in the WHCs.
Yes, we are.
The faster we realize that and the more carefully we plan it, the better Rangers will improve
OMG, ok, what would you propose? Trade who? If all you are trading are your bottom six guys you wont get much back...
This team would be ridiculously deep if those two were on the 3rd lineI see Brassard very similar to Rich Peverley, 3rd line player on the Bruins. Last season, Peverley was on pace for 60 points over an 82 GP season. He was the Bruins 3rd line center behind Krejci and Bergeron. Ideally, I'd like to see Brassard in that role. But Richards ruined that idea. 2Cs on bad teams, 3Cs on contending teams IMO.
Hagelin, I think he is a good complimentary player and top 6 forward on most NHL teams with his puck pursuit talents. Dude is relentless on the forecheck at times.
LA has Kopitar-Brown and Richards-Carter as the anchors of their first two lines.
I don't care who the coach is. The Rangers don't have that type of talent. They just don't.
This team would be ridiculously deep if those two were on the 3rd line