bernmeister
Registered User
if the Rangers don't do anything to make the offense more potent, why would Hank stay? whether its a trade or signing, offense is NEEDED. just a new coach system won't make us SC contenders
This is what I don't get.
I fully agree with ^.
Then, when I suggest a moderate to high risk, high to very high reward overture to move McD for McKinnon, (while also converting MDZ, 20 something overall, into Duncan Siemens, like 8th overall), I get no support.
If we trade enough vets and premium guys we will be ahead of the cap, we can rent somebody if we have to while Skjei emerges in 2 years. In the meantime we get McKinnon now.
How else do you propose getting real offense?
There was a time when Girardi + Staal + would have got us Yak +, that boat has sailed.
And the lesson is: Even if it hurts, we need to move certain desired pieces to get ahead of the curve, or we won't get partners motivated to move such pieces.
Am I, like, talking Swahili or something?
Lundsanity30 is right, we need more real offense. I made a comprehensive plan. What alternatives to you guys propose that, as he said, gets us real offense now?