Levitate
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2004
- 31,706
- 9,334
Just wondering, why can't the long-term contract be signed until 1/1?
Cuz the CBA says so.
Just wondering, why can't the long-term contract be signed until 1/1?
Just wondering, why can't the long-term contract be signed until 1/1?
The Ultimate Team Player, unlike others who say they love to play for the Rangers and then bolt to the highest payer
Why the **** did we sign Glass. No Glass we can give Zucc the contract he wants. Now we have an impeding UFA who just led our team in points and a bottom 5 player in the league for 3 years.
One of the few guys around the league who deserved what was coming to him as an FA takes a discount. Does anyone know Zucc's family background? This dude sure doesn't seem worried about money/security. I really hope it works out well for both him and the team in the end.
Just wondering, why can't the long-term contract be signed until 1/1?
Without fail! You can set your clock to it. Literally EVERY thread.
Without fail! You can set your clock to it. Literally EVERY thread.
Without fail! You can set your clock to it. Literally EVERY thread.
The Rangers signed Lundqvist to a one-year deal after his ELC and a six year deal after that.Didn't we do the same thing with Lundqvist?
I haven't bashed the signing yet, but that move is starting to look like it will really cost us
Wow. So short sighted. He can be a UFA next summer correct? Yea, that's gonna be cheap.
Edit - I guess te front office still views him as a risky sign long term? Still, a 45 point guy at 4.5 x 4 is way better than the alternative...a 6.5M+ Zucc next summer if he tops 60 points this year.
Without fail! You can set your clock to it. Literally EVERY thread.
The Rangers signed Lundqvist to a one-year deal after his ELC and a six year deal after that.
Lets see how well he plays this year to deserve a long term, lucrative deal. Sather is smarter than you think. Zuccarello is highly overrated by this fan base. He's a nice player, but far from a superstar.