Siludin
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2010
- 7,543
- 5,490
This is actually the right take. You don't want to throw young players to the wolves, and this gives them depth in key positions while those players jump into the league on ELCs. It also reduces the amount of gifted ice time you would otherwise provide to guys like Edvinsson, so they don't as easily hit performance metrics that would see them get huge raises in second contracts.Plan is to fill team with plugs for short periods, some of them will surprise with improvement, most will be gone in 2-3 years and will be replaced with guys like Mazur, Kasper, Edvinsson, Danielson, ASP, Cossa. Red Wings have 2 first round picks in 2024. Proper rebuild should be 10 years, Red Wings on their 7years of rebuild. Don't worry guys 2-3 more years and then we will see who is laughing
Nic Hague is an example of someone who a lot of fans of rebuilding teams might have hypothetically thrown into a top-4 role, and at this stage would have already had making $5.5m off some middling 29 point third season.
Taking a restrained approach in developing players by signing veterans that they must share ice time with/surpass is actually good cap management, especially if those veterans come in on relatively short deals.