Value of: Your Teams Ullmark Offer

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
5,001
2,201
Trading from a position of weakness = lower return

Habs don't offer up anything. Ullmark doesn't fit our window. Swayman would be the target
 
  • Like
Reactions: horner

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
Canes would trade our 23 2nd rounder, rights to Coghlan, and Drury next year for Ullmark and Forbort. That way boston has a good piece for a rental at the deadline next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruins4thecup65

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,170
18,931
North Andover, MA
Boston is gonna have to move one of Hall, Ullmark or Coyle or a combo of Swayman, DeBrusk, Frederic, Gryz that adds up to 5 million.

If they don’t get their price on those assets, they will dump Gryz and Frederic at a loss to get to that 5 million cleared.

So get your Corleone “nothing” offers out of here.

Canes would trade our 23 2nd rounder, rights to Coghlan, and Drury next year for Ullmark and Forbort. That way boston has a good piece for a rental at the deadline next year.

I’d think about it if Coghlan was Rees. 1st + prospect I assume is the ask, but I totally overrate Drury and Rees :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan

Gubbhornet

Registered User
Dec 5, 2019
440
234
I'd like Ullmark to stay in Bruins. But just for the fun of it I'm going to make a 3 team trade proposal:

To Florida: Linus Ullmark
To Yotes: Bobrovsky + 1st and somewhat ok prospect from Florida
To Bruins: Nick Schmaltz + 2nd from Florida

This should be done after signing bonus been paid out.

Yotes would save alot of real dollars and can potentially save even more thanks to Bobs cap hit.

Florida save cap and upgrade goalie position. (Ok, Bob won this year but realistically Linus is a better choice)

Bruins get even better forward depth and can keep Swayman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colt.45Orr

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,170
18,931
North Andover, MA
Are the Bruins really looking to move Ullmark for futures? Aren't ya in win now mode? Who are your C's next year?

The Bruins need to clear 5 million in cap and allocating 9+ million to the goalie position seems like a luxury, especially as a tandem when you can only have one guy on the ice at a time.

Centers will probably be Zacha and Bergeron and Coyle. Zacha was 2nd in the team in 5 on 5 scoring (to Pasta) playing on Pasta’s wing and him sliding over to his natural C position seems like it will be fine. Team is kinda of counting on Zacha being the medium term #2C.

Are the Bruins in win now mode? f*** if I know. Their D group is all under 30 and McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo is a heck of a base. Their goalie group is all under 30 led by the presumed Vezina winner and one the the games top young goalies. They have an elite scorer in his prime in Pasta.

But…

Bergeron, Marchand and Hall are old (we assume Krejci is done) but still effective. But they saw Bergeron break down in round 1. So it’s an interesting question what direction they take. Relying on the old guys seems dubious, but what choice to they have? And if Bergeron does retire it’s even more interesting.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,842
27,632
Medfield, MA
I feel like there’s a three way to be made between Edmonton, Boston and Winnipeg.

To EDM: Ullmark, DeBrusk
To BOS: Dubois
To WPG: Edmonton Draft Picks: ‘23 2nd, ‘24 1st, ‘24 2nd.

WPG also deals Helle for more picks and then deals all those picks for players (like CGY’s Lindholm) or rebuilds.
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,419
3,072
Are the Bruins really looking to move Ullmark for futures? Aren't ya in win now mode? Who are your C's next year?
It’ll be for futures or cheaper options that fill roster needs. We are in a bad spot for this season.
 

TheImpatientPanther

Registered User
Jan 17, 2013
28,544
25,570
Ontario, Canada
I'd like Ullmark to stay in Bruins. But just for the fun of it I'm going to make a 3 team trade proposal:

To Florida: Linus Ullmark
To Yotes: Bobrovsky + 1st and somewhat ok prospect from Florida
To Bruins: Nick Schmaltz + 2nd from Florida

This should be done after signing bonus been paid out.

Yotes would save alot of real dollars and can potentially save even more thanks to Bobs cap hit.

Florida save cap and upgrade goalie position. (Ok, Bob won this year but realistically Linus is a better choice)

Bruins get even better forward depth and can keep Swayman.

Bob has his NMC, doubt he waives from Cinderella Panthers to go to the turbulent Coyotes?
Bob will be a Panther until end of next year then his contract becomes tradeable in July 2024
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,442
4,803
The Bruins need to clear 5 million in cap and allocating 9+ million to the goalie position seems like a luxury, especially as a tandem when you can only have one guy on the ice at a time.

Centers will probably be Zacha and Bergeron and Coyle. Zacha was 2nd in the team in 5 on 5 scoring (to Pasta) playing on Pasta’s wing and him sliding over to his natural C position seems like it will be fine. Team is kinda of counting on Zacha being the medium term #2C.

Are the Bruins in win now mode? f*** if I know. Their D group is all under 30 and McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo is a heck of a base. Their goalie group is all under 30 led by the presumed Vezina winner and one the the games top young goalies. They have an elite scorer in his prime in Pasta.

But…

Bergeron, Marchand and Hall are old (we assume Krejci is done) but still effective. But they saw Bergeron break down in round 1. So it’s an interesting question what direction they take. Relying on the old guys seems dubious, but what choice to they have? And if Bergeron does retire it’s even more interesting.
I would not put Hall in the old category.......
 

Gordon Lightfoot

Hey Dotcom. Nice to meet you.
Sponsor
Feb 3, 2009
18,934
5,413
As an Oiler fan I would offer 2 2nds and a B prospect if we move Campbell or buy him out.
As a Bruins fan, I'd take that. My guess is Bergeron returns, Krejci does not, so it's kind of a halfhearted "run it back" situation. And I would run with Swayman as the main guy in net.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G Backup

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,170
18,931
North Andover, MA
Leafs fan here, we don't need more playoff chokers so no offer.

Maybe at some point if you gather enough chokers it reverse jinxes? I guess the Leafs roster has already proven that’s impossible.

On a serious note, you think after having Rask say “I’m healthy put me in” and have it not be true they would have been more skeptical of Ullmark when he was clearly laboring late in the series.

I feel like there’s a three way to be made between Edmonton, Boston and Winnipeg.

To EDM: Ullmark, DeBrusk
To BOS: Dubois
To WPG: Edmonton Draft Picks: ‘23 2nd, ‘24 1st, ‘24 2nd.

WPG also deals Helle for more picks and then deals all those picks for players (like CGY’s Lindholm) or rebuilds.

I dunno how EDM takes on that much cap. I’m fixated on moving out Ullmark for futures and space and big hockey deals with Calgary atm.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,842
27,632
Medfield, MA
Maybe at some point if you gather enough chokers it reverse jinxes? I guess the Leafs roster has already proven that’s impossible.

On a serious note, you think after having Rask say “I’m healthy put me in” and have it not be true they would have been more skeptical of Ullmark when he was clearly laboring late in the series.



I dunno how EDM takes on that much cap. I’m fixated on moving out Ullmark for futures and space and big hockey deals with Calgary atm.
Maybe Yamamoto is one of the pieces they send to Winnipeg. Yamo dealt, Campbell bought out, plus their existing space is something like $11m.

They could add Ullmark (or Sway), JDB and still have $2m in cap space accruing for a deadline deal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad