The Hockey Tonk Man
Registered User
YupYou don’t see a lot of goalies going at the deadline for a lot of reasons.
Feel like the last one was Miller to the Blues? At the deadline
Didn’t work out at all
YupYou don’t see a lot of goalies going at the deadline for a lot of reasons.
Good idea but not enough
I would want Ostapchuk or Krieg with those picks. Sens can keep Lassi
Ullmark didn't sign an extension offer from GMKA. If he wanted to stay, that was his opportunity.
You don’t see a lot of goalies going at the deadline for a lot of reasons.
We're absolutely not trading Schmaltz essentially for free. Bob isn't getting any younger and Schmaltz can fetch a 1st or 2nd by himself.I'd like Ullmark to stay in Bruins. But just for the fun of it I'm going to make a 3 team trade proposal:
To Florida: Linus Ullmark
To Yotes: Bobrovsky + 1st and somewhat ok prospect from Florida
To Bruins: Nick Schmaltz + 2nd from Florida
This should be done after signing bonus been paid out.
Yotes would save alot of real dollars and can potentially save even more thanks to Bobs cap hit.
Florida save cap and upgrade goalie position. (Ok, Bob won this year but realistically Linus is a better choice)
Bruins get even better forward depth and can keep Swayman.
We're absolutely not trading Schmaltz essentially for free. Bob isn't getting any younger and Schmaltz can fetch a 1st or 2nd by himself.
If LA is serious about trying to win they should not be moving Roy.What about
Canes: Arvidsson or Iafallo
Kings: picks and prospect
Kings: Ullmark
Bruins: Roy, 2nd, 3rd
We save 2.5m in salary but take on 5m more in cap hit and for 2 years we still pay 2.5m in bonuses so we don't even save that much. Basically 2.5m for one year. So no, we're not taking on a 34yo goalie on a 10m cap hit for free. You'd have to attach assets with him for us to take that kind of contract, and I doubt Florida would even want to do that. In this scenario they get Ullmark as a replacement which is probably fine. But you can pretty much take what you have coming to the yotes and double it as the cost for taking on Bob and moving Schmaltz out.Well, the assumtion was also that yotes management want to save real dollars. But up the ok prospect to a good one then?
Kings need a starting goalie tho...If LA is serious about trying to win they should not be moving Roy.
Well those team will likely turn to the Bruins with interest in UllmarkThat assumes that they'll find a team willing to meet their price on Hellebuyck this off-season, which is not guaranteed at all.
Pheonix is better than what the King's started the season with last year.Kings need a starting goalie tho...
Cant sign UFA
Schmaltz is more dollar than cap hit, bob is more cap hit than dollar. Owners goal is to reach cap floor for as few dollars as possible.We save 2.5m in salary but take on 5m more in cap hit and for 2 years we still pay 2.5m in bonuses so we don't even save that much. Basically 2.5m for one year. So no, we're not taking on a 34yo goalie on a 10m cap hit for free. You'd have to attach assets with him for us to take that kind of contract, and I doubt Florida would even want to do that. In this scenario they get Ullmark as a replacement which is probably fine. But you can pretty much take what you have coming to the yotes and double it as the cost for taking on Bob and moving Schmaltz out.
So then why would we buy out Kassian and Nemeth with real money? And why would we say we're not trading Schmaltz or Keller?Schmaltz is more dollar than cap hit, bob is more cap hit than dollar. Owners goal is to reach cap floor for as few dollars as possible.
So then why would we buy out Kassian and Nemeth with real money? And why would we say we're not trading Schmaltz or Keller?
Even if we were doing that this still wouldn't make sense because there's barely any savings and we're giving Schmaltz away for free.
I'm in. I like krebs .Peyton Krebs makes a lot of sense for both teams. Sabres have too many young centers to get him the opportunity he’s earned. Bruins need forwards on ELCs. I’d welcome ullmark back with open arms
Peyton Krebs makes a lot of sense for both teams. Sabres have too many young centers to get him the opportunity he’s earned. Bruins need forwards on ELCs. I’d welcome ullmark back with open arms
If Ullmark *wanted* to come back, Sabres should welcome him with open arms... as long as the price is right. No interest in helping the Bruins out of cap-hell.The Sabres were a mess when he left, and he still only really seemed to go because the Bruins made him a better offer. It would be silly not to welcome him back in Buffalo if he’d accept a trade here. He’d be a fantastic stopgap while Levi develops.
all you need are two teams who want him.....Trading from a position of weakness = lower return
Habs don't offer up anything. Ullmark doesn't fit our window. Swayman would be the target
Yah. But lots of goalie for sale alsoall you need are two teams who want him.....
Trading from a position of weakness = lower return
Habs don't offer up anything. Ullmark doesn't fit our window. Swayman would be the target
MAF, after a vezina season, got traded got traded for nothing.Sure but they don’t have to move Ullmark. They could move Gryz and Frederic. They would move a goalie because it’s a good return because they have two #1 goalies.
Devils should be all over this