That's a reoccurring theme on these boards.... packaging a bunch of crap and expecting somebody to give up something of value for it.We would all love to deal them. The only problem is they have ZERO trade value.
That's a reoccurring theme on these boards.... packaging a bunch of crap and expecting somebody to give up something of value for it.We would all love to deal them. The only problem is they have ZERO trade value.
9 might not be enough, considering we dressed 13 in last year's shortened season.
In order of total TOI:
McAvoy
Clifton
Lauzon
Gryz
Zboril
Miller
Carlo
Kampfer
Reilly
Tinordi
Vaak
Moore
Achan
As you showed:
Grzelcyk -- McAvoy
Reilly -- Carlo
Forbort -- Clifton
Moore -- Zboril
I see on D:
junk -- McAvoy
fairly new junk -- Carlo
fresh new junk -- Clifton
old junk -- wasted pick
It's not that bad come on. I actually think zboril and vaak surprise big time.I see on D:
junk -- McAvoy
fairly new junk -- Carlo
fresh new junk -- Clifton
old junk -- wasted pick
RD is an area of concern? McAvoy and Carlo as your top two RD and we're weak?Moore is a LD. RD isn't crowded. It is an area of concern.
It's not that bad come on. I actually think zboril and vaak surprise big time.
McAvoy must be licking his chops. That D will increase his asking price by $2-2.5mil on his next contract if he wants to get paid only or he will ask to be traded if he wants to win the cup and sees no future here. Having a revolving door of a D partner as Krejci had on his wings since Lucic/Horton days? McAvoy says "F**k no, I am off".
Vaak plays more games in his career in Boston and not Providence that will surprise me....big timeIt's not that bad come on. I actually think zboril and vaak surprise big time.
RD is an area of concern? McAvoy and Carlo as your top two RD and we're weak?
RD is an area of concern? McAvoy and Carlo as your top two RD and we're weak?
It's not that bad come on. I actually think zboril and vaak surprise big time.
Oh those top 2 are amazing. But Clifton is a part time player. And god only knows who plays RD after that. No depth.
I see on D:
junk -- McAvoy
fairly new junk -- Carlo
fresh new junk -- Clifton
old junk -- wasted pick
Alright ya'll are being a little harsh at this point. Calling Gryz and Reilly junk is ridiculous. They both average .5 ppg and come at less cost and near production as Krug. Clifton is a damn good defensemen as well. The jury is still out on Forbort but I think the logic is to switch him and Gryz when games tighten up. Let's see how it plays out before passing judgement...the group may compliment themselves better than most think.
I would still like to add Erik Gudbranson to replace some of Miller's toughness...seems like Forbort replaced Lauzon but still feel like we haven't addressed those Tinordi/Miller roles with no in-house option there.
Just a feeling. Zboril especially I thought he played well last year in the games he playedbased on?
Just a feeling. Zboril especially I thought he played well last year in the games he played
After losing Miller, Lauzon, Ritchie.........I fear we are way too soft. Foligno can handle himself, especially against the middle weights but thats it! Frederic showed he'll bang with Wilson but what about Reeves? Maroon? Johnson from NYI? Outside of Wilson, none of these guys can play hockey but when they're taking cheap shots at McAvoy, Pasta, Marshy, Bergy, etc...........we'll be in trouble.
I'd like Gudbranson as a 6-7-8th type of insurance policy!
After just reviewing our contracts for this year and next.......how the hell do we re-up McAvoy?
1. Let Bergy walk or hope he takes the biggest hometown discount in history
2. Trade Ullmark if Swayman is the guy
3. Trade Debrusk this season for a pick(3.75 off the cap right to Charlie)
4. Move Gryz
Posters taking extreme stances on the roster players and prospects are doing a disservice to their own posts by not taking the analysis part seriously
The bruins players aren’t junk, particularly the defense, the issue is that’s not enough. We’re trying to win a cup, not compete for 4th place.
Posters taking extreme stances on the roster players and prospects are doing a disservice to their own posts by not taking the analysis part seriously
The bruins players aren’t junk, particularly the defense, the issue is that’s not enough. We’re trying to win a cup, not compete for 4th place.