FrankerC
Registered User
DeBum.....jesus is this your idea of a chirp? I feel a ton of second-hand embarrassment for you, lol.
No embarrassment here. Ready for that bum to be gone.
DeBum.....jesus is this your idea of a chirp? I feel a ton of second-hand embarrassment for you, lol.
Granlund was just sitting there perfect replacement for dk only 29. Wanted him.
Well he also had a 2.43 gaa and a .911 save percentage in 29 playoff games. Let's just wait and see what happens over the course of this season with him and Ullman. I am not disappointed with Ullman but 1.2 mil could have been used elsewhere.
And a bottle of scotch with fried eggs so Adams signs that one.How do the Bruins land Eichel is my question?
1. NHL forward young asset-> Jake Debrusk 3.675 million
2. NHL dman young asset-> Matt Gryz 3.687 million
3. Semi ready NHL prospect-> Jack Studnicka 0.769
4. NHL 1st round draft pick 2022 or 2023, Buffalo gets to pick
5. Serviceable NHL dman-> John Moore 2.75 million
6. Serviceable NHL forward-> Chris Wagner 1.35 million
in return Jack Eichel at 20% retained (8 million per)
I would have taken Mrazek over Ullmark at 1.2 mil cheaper. Over his career Mrazek has a .910 sv pct and a 2.61 gaa over his career. And what did we do with the 3.3 in goaltender savings, sign some retreads.
This is assuming that Mrazek would agree to sign with the Bruins.
You seem like you know lots about Ullman.Well he also had a 2.43 gaa and a .911 save percentage in 29 playoff games. Let's just wait and see what happens over the course of this season with him and Ullman. I am not disappointed with Ullman but 1.2 mil could have been used elsewhere.
No embarrassment here. Ready for that bum to be gone.
I am ready for him to be gone too but you’re also selling as low as his value would go if you trade him right now. It’s obviously to a different scale, but do we really need to learn the Tyler Seguin lesson all over again?
Tyler Seguin? Dougie Hamilton? Reilly Smith? You'd think we'd be tired of the Bruins sending their young players all over the league to progress. Hell, some suggested trading Pastrnak this past season because he was in a rut and we've seen the McAvoy thread
The Hamilton one would have been close to “acceptable” had they drafted smarter with that first rounder.
But yes, so many examples. I can’t stand DeBrusk at this point but I also want more than something like a third or fourth rounder for him and am willing to sacrifice my sanity to give it another go this year even if my expectations are at rock bottom.
Just like you and Mrazek.You seem like you know lots about Ullman.
We could of picked up Coleman, Granlund or Wennberg at center.Which 2C and 1LD UFAs did they miss out on?
How do the Bruins land Eichel is my question?
1. NHL forward young asset-> Jake Debrusk 3.675 million
2. NHL dman young asset-> Matt Gryz 3.687 million
3. Semi ready NHL prospect-> Jack Studnicka 0.769
4. NHL 1st round draft pick 2022 or 2023, Buffalo gets to pick
5. Serviceable NHL dman-> John Moore 2.75 million
6. Serviceable NHL forward-> Chris Wagner 1.35 million
in return Jack Eichel at 20% retained (8 million per)
How do the Bruins land Eichel is my question?
1. NHL forward young asset-> Jake Debrusk 3.675 million
2. NHL dman young asset-> Matt Gryz 3.687 million
3. Semi ready NHL prospect-> Jack Studnicka 0.769
4. NHL 1st round draft pick 2022 or 2023, Buffalo gets to pick
5. Serviceable NHL dman-> John Moore 2.75 million
6. Serviceable NHL forward-> Chris Wagner 1.35 million
in return Jack Eichel at 20% retained (8 million per)
This isn't even close. It's a whole bunch of dimes and nickels equalling 45 cents for a dollar.
I believe the money should have been spent on a 2c and a top LD which they are obviously missing. Spending most of the money on the bottom 6 will not put the team on top of the pack. We should not have to sign all these bottom 6 players if we had anything in the farm system.
There was no 2c or top LD available in this current pool of UFAs this summer. David Krejci was the best center available
We could of picked up Coleman, Granlund or Wennberg at center.
Oleksiak, McCabe or even Suter would have added more to the defense.
Point is we did not have to go out and throw this money around if no true value was available. Next year the crop of rfas will be much better and our hands will be pretty much tied with not much cap space.
This isn't even close. It's a whole bunch of dimes and nickels equalling 45 cents for a dollar.
Really all I said is these guys are better than what we got and we should not have wasted the available cap space if you cannot fill our urgent needs. Do not just grab here and there so you can spend all your cap, did panic set in?The point is, you literally are going to bring up every other player and say you would have rather had them. You wanted Coleman and his contract? Seriously? Granlund @ 5M for 4 years is questionable at best. Wennberg? Seriously?
Oleksiak was acquired and signed by SEA before he even reached free agency. Even if he hit free agency, you really wanted to sign a guy like him to 5Y deal at 4.6M? Suter was a "pass hard as f***" candidate as it gets when you see the contract and the behind the scene rumors. The only guy I'll legitimately give you is Jake McCabe, who comes with injury issues so is a risk especially at the 4X4 he got.
It's kind of hilarious you're saying we should have signed different players; all of which came at contracts worse than the players we signed while not significantly upgrading on the players we brought in. Then in the same breath bitch about being tied up with no cap space. The guys you suggest all cost more.
the above deal for eichel may work if it's :
debrusk, coyle, gryzlyck, moore, & wagner for eichel
i would offer coyle as opposed to studnicka if i was bruins brass. (allows centre's to stay younger for the future )