Great read and work by Dom.
Interesting read for sure.
But, Honest question... Are we counting on this? Because if we are, I think aren't in a good spot.
If the Swayman/Ullmark combo is working well, why interrupt it? If they aren't doing well, maybe just ride the season out with a slightly better pick? Let's say Ullmark/Swayman has us solidly in a playoff spot. Why add Rask and send down Swayman when he's the future? We already sent him the message last year that he wasn't good enough to play over an injured Rask. We also just signed another goalie at 5M for 4 seasons. Not saying Swayman should just be handed the keys to the kingdom, but hypothetically, maybe he sees these moves and doesn't think the Bruins have faith in him.
As for Krejci, I like the idea of adding him if the team is in a contending position. If we are a wildcard spot or worse, I don't know if I see him as this magical piece thats gonna push us over the edge. He's been on the team for the past decade, and a better version was the only version of him to get us over that hump once. Expecting the 36 year old version of him to be the missing piece, I'm just not sold on. They need to figure out the long term solution, and that's either via trade or draft (and having a down year may help speed that up).
Anyways, I'm not against adding either of them. But at this stage of the team lifecycle, I'm worried they are too focused on the team they were than the team in front of them and the team they will be.
I think the worse thing that could happen is this team to be a middling team, with some sort of false aspirations that Krejci and Rask are going to come and save this team (a feat neither of them alone could do on (in my opinion) better Bruins teams.
Sorry for the rant, well written article, just have a lot of concerns for the direction of the team and potentially mediocre results. Mediocre is worse than being bad, you don't get a good draft position, and you still aren't good enough to win it.
Maybe they surprise and go above and beyond my expectations (which seem to be much lower than those advance stats that predict they will be 2nd in the division) and these moves will make sense. Otherwise, I think riding out the lifecycle of the team is a better move than hanging on for dear life to our 2011 core.
I definitely respect Dom's opinion on the matter, just concerned about the team direction if they choose to do this and they have the same results.