Boston Bruins Your roster changes / proposals XI

Status
Not open for further replies.

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,729
21,853
People are glossing over the fact that Hall is the Krejci of the line now, not Coyle. Hall is the facilitator and puck carrier....Plus he actually has speed to collapse the defense (unlike krejci).... Have Hall carry the puck with speed into the zone, coyle crash the net.....Hall can then shoot or dish to Smith who should be good for 25 minimum. People forget this is a pace game now and Krejci just wasn't that good before Hall got here.
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.
 

WhalerTurnedBruin55

Fading out, thanks for the times.
Oct 31, 2008
11,347
6,720
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.

This is where I am, too. Should at least see what we have before we package it up and send it away. Obviously Studnicka needs to earn some time there, but he should definitely be given a fair shot at it. Ironic, we did that with defense last year, and the kid that rose above the occasion is no longer here. But I think Studnicka has the highest offensive potential in the 23 and under C group right now, so here's our chance to see if he can handle it.

If he can't, we're in no different place than we were before. And in all honesty, if the team really is 6-10 games of Studnicka from not making the playoffs, this isn't the team that should be giving up futures for fool's runs at the end anyways.

Definitely in the see what we got camp.
 

BruinsBtn

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
22,080
13,548
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.

That's absolutely right. Everyone is in love with Colorado and their 2nd line is Compher-Kadri-Burakovsky
 

yazmybaby

Registered User
Sep 13, 2015
2,716
2,321
Brampton ON, Canada
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.
Move Smith to the Bergy line and move Pasty to Halls line and all should be good.
Smith played very well with Bergy and Marchy when given the chance and it makes us a more balanced team, not relying on one line only to score.
Stud should be playing on the third line at best to start the season and earn his spot.
I want him at Center.
 

The don godfather

Registered User
Jul 5, 2018
20,570
21,925
Woodbridge Ontario
Move Smith to the Bergy line and move Pasty to Halls line and all should be good.
Smith played very well with Bergy and Marchy when given the chance and it makes us a more balanced team, not relying on one line only to score.
Stud should be playing on the third line at best to start the season and earn his spot.
I want him at Center.
Pasta on 2nd and smith on 1st problem solved well balanced attack
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,533
21,171
Connecticut
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.

Well stated.

Agreed.
 

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,315
19,213
North Andover, MA
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.

If Studnicka beats out Coyle for the job that’s a good thing.

And you are right that they are basically even on their 2nd line vs previous years.

Now look at the bottom six. I think it’s a lot better.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
26,088
28,573
Medfield, MA
a Hall-Coyle-Smith line is perfectly fine on paper. It's talented enough to be a 2nd line in the NHL.

The problems with it are this:
1. The Bruins are supposed to be some kind of contender and IMO a real contender should have a better 2nd line
2. It is a regression to back before they got Hall. Now instead of Krejci carrying 2 borderline (or worse) 3rd liners, it'll be Hall having to do it.

Hall with Krejci was what made that one of the most dangerous 2nd lines in the NHL. Now it'll be middle of the pack at best unless Coyle manages to do what he has never really done before and that's consistently play like he did in the 2019 playoffs for a whole 82 game season.

For the record, this is why I would rather see Studnicka get a shot there over Coyle (assuming he looks the part in camp). With Coyle, we know what he is. He's a really high end 3rd line C when he's on his game, but offensively has never consistently produced enough to be a reliable 2nd line C. Studnicka may never been that guy either, but we at least know he has a lot of the raw skills you look for in a 2nd line C so IMO we need to give it a go and see if he can be it.
I think you can make the case the 2nd line is better (on paper), because it wasn’t Krejci carrying two 3rd liners, it was Krejci carrying one 3rd liner and our 13th forward: Kuhlman, Backes, whoever.

At least Hall will have two proven and effective NHL players to skate with.
 

NeelyDan

Owned by Alicat, Ladyfan and caz16
Sponsor
Jun 28, 2010
7,816
16,154
Dundas, Ontario
What smoke? You're just speculating. You're also giving Sweeney the benefit of the doubt at the expense of saying Krejci didn't tell him he was done until after free agency.

That's absurd. The fact our GM signed a bunch of free agents who can play center also totally refutes any benefit of the doubt Sweeney might get.

“He did not close the door on returning back,” Cassidy pointed out. “I don’t know if that will happen or when it will happen at all, but he didn’t say I’m retiring and done from the National Hockey League. So, that’s good news for us in the sense that maybe in a couple of months, he’ll feel satisfied with what he needed to do, or maybe not.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blowfish

Gordoff

Formerly: Strafer
Jan 18, 2003
26,519
28,319
The Hub
“He did not close the door on returning back,” Cassidy pointed out. “I don’t know if that will happen or when it will happen at all, but he didn’t say I’m retiring and done from the National Hockey League. So, that’s good news for us in the sense that maybe in a couple of months, he’ll feel satisfied with what he needed to do, or maybe not.”
B's front office psycho-babble.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,503
21,895
So 10 million plus is okay with you? Taking up 13-15% of your cap?

With that contract you're simply hurting the team elsewhere. It's not just about one player.

Why is everything final with you? see above quote to analyser.

"It doesn’t make sense to move him. The fact this is being discussed is pointless."

You need franchise guys.
If you’re not willing to keep them why bother?

Did Bergeron/Krejci/Rask/Chara contracts stop the Bruins from contending when they were signed?
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
23,653
16,051
Southwestern Ontario
You need franchise guys.
If you’re not willing to keep them why bother?

Did Bergeron/Krejci/Rask/Chara contracts stop the Bruins from contending when they were signed?

Don't disagree but with a cap you need to be prudent not to impact other parts of the team. If the demand is outside team structure/plans unfortunately you would need to consider a trade. A trade can work in the team's benefit as well.
 

Fenian24

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 14, 2010
11,058
15,550
Charlie Coyle as number 2 center and Matt Grzlyk as a top 4 D get you a lottery pick. Not a good one because the Bergeron line and McAvoy will win a enough games to not be Arizona/Buffalo awful.

Good news is that should be the end of Sweeney and Cassidy.
 

Ratty

Registered User
Feb 2, 2003
12,043
3,591
Rive Gauche
Visit site
Giving Studnicka a shot at 2C is worth the risk. And the risk is mitigated by Coyle being available, healthy and willing. If Studs proves he's a fit for that line it eliminates the need to trade for a Dvorak or Monahan, for example. Those assets can be better used at the trade deadline.

Keeping moves in house is a win-win, considering the exorbitant cost to acquire a proven center.
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,380
New England
Charlie Coyle as number 2 center and Matt Grzlyk as a top 4 D get you a lottery pick. Not a good one because the Bergeron line and McAvoy will win a enough games to not be Arizona/Buffalo awful.

Good news is that should be the end of Sweeney and Cassidy.

You’re in for disappointment. It’s good enough to make the playoffs, but not go far. Mediocre/middling as usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bp13
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad