SidDidNothingWrong
Beau's IcedCapp
- Jan 2, 2014
- 2,284
- 9
Well some of the problems are with the qualifying tournaments. Some of these smaller hockey market countries just can't get their best players released to play in the qualifiers. I don't think the schedule or matchups were the problem though. We don't want to exclude the weaker countries, because they will never grow their program if we do that.
Not exclusion. I would put the US and Canada in the same group or something like that. So hockey powerhouses and teams that are just good (so Canada and US for example) have two tough games and one game against a weaker country and a weaker country has two games against another weaker country and one against a contender. This cakewalk to the elimination round is just so unexciting. In a good competitive tournament, the powerhouses are challenged early and often and you leave the weaker countries that are capable of upsetting with more of a rest. Canada and the US should not have to play an easier schedule than Norway. That is so bogus. They are not the teams that need the extra rest. Canada still may have come out on top but that is not what is bothering me. There should be more competition. The US playing Slovakia and Slovenia is not competition. Canada playing Norway and Austria is not competition.
Canada's schedule should have looked like:
USA
Finland
Austria
and America's:
Canada
Sweden
Latvia
You might as well have not tuned in to watch the prelims. You knew statistically Canada was going to decimate those 2 non contenders. Literally the antithesis of competition.
Last edited: