Marky9er
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2008
- 7,476
- 729
Keep telling me Raymond is going 3 so we can get Stutzle at 4.
Where can you see this game?Mo is really good on PP entries on this big ice
Stream on ESPN+ for anyone that wants to watchWhere can you see this game?
I think Mo is gassed after playing like 26 minutes or so yesterday
A PPQB Seider is not. That's okay as he's good in other facets of the game and we already have Hronek for that role. His decision making on the PP leaves me wanting more, I think he's much more suited for a trigger man role ala Weber.
You see Seider as a triggerman? Considering he has no shot at the moment I'm not sure how you see that.
He's running a really good pp1 right now. Money on entries, putting the puck in the right spots (besides one time he missed Stutzle), keeping the defense honest with his wrister.
He's not flashy or dominant but he's doing a really good job as a PPQB imo.
At the NHL level I do. He's fine in the role at this level, but I don't see him being able to be a PPQB at the NHL level. It's not that he has been bad in the role I just have an issue with his shot selection and he lacks the dynamic flair I like in a PPQB.
He reminds me of Edler running a PP. He's not bad, but you can certainly find a player more suited for the role.
How about Suter, Hedman, Pietrangelo, Carlson, Theodore? Lidstrom? I think Seider can definitely be a PPQB, I see literally no reason why he wouldn't be able to do it at the NHL level.At the NHL level I do. He's fine in the role at this level, but I don't see him being able to be a PPQB at the NHL level. It's not that he has been bad in the role I just have an issue with his shot selection and he lacks the dynamic flair I like in a PPQB.
He reminds me of Edler running a PP. He's not bad, but you can certainly find a player more suited for the role.