That lineup could give TC a run for their money NOW...never mind a year and a half from now...and this coming from a Canuck
Yeah, Yeah...ppl gonna argue Matthews isn't ready. I watched him at World Championships and here...I say, He IS!
***
PS: Don't throw Quick under the bus...he wasn't to blame for 6 odd man rushes , including 2-0 breakaway, in first period vs Team Euro...Had bad puck luck vs Canada...it happens...
Dean Lombardi saying he'd pick Dubinsky, Backes, Abdelkader again over Kessel and Okposo. I hope his idiotic comments seal his fate and he's never allowed to make roster decisions again with USA Hockey. What a clown
No no and no they would not give TC a run for their money. You've already penciled Mathews as your number 1 center. Uh why? He hasn't proven crap let alone played an Nhl game. Mathews is still very young and raw with no Nhl experience so let's make him our #1 center. Yet, you have Ghost who played last year, did some pretty incredible things as a rookie defenseman and also led Team North America in points in this tourney penciled in as your seventh defenseman.
Really just pathetic. The old boys club is so stuck in their ways that no degree of failure would make them even reconsider, let alone make changes.
Ryan can't spell "intense?" Pretty sure it's actually that Abdelkader, Dubinsky, Backes can't spell "talent" and "ability."
No... I have to believe you are being sarcastic.
Will they be in contention... yes. Up there with Canada... no.
Canada is miles ahead now and will be adding better players so I am not sure of your math.
For those blaming Torts and some of the players selections....Who would've made this team among forwards, Eichel, Gaudreau? Maybe T.Johnson, or Kessel? Would they make the difference? People are acting like there was no Pavelski, no Kane, no Wheeler, no Pacioretty, no Suter, no Byfuglien. But they are. The game against Europe, which was the downfall of the tournament, they didn't lose because J.Johnson and Dubinsky and Abdelkader played bad. They lost because everyone played a bad game. Kane made a mistake that resulted in a goal. McDonagh made mistakes. They were giving up 2on1 3on1 rushes every three minutes in the first 30 minutes. They had pretty good players, but they all played bad in that game. Pavelski and Wheeler were invisible. Where were they? And if someone wants to blame Tortorella, those 2on1 rushes, that has nothing to do with Torts, if you watch Columbus or if you watched NYR, this is not something you would see from the teams he's coached. It's the players who play the game. Players make mistakes or good plays. If someone thinks that with Sullivan as the head coach, or Laviolette, and Gaudreau and Eichel and Gostisbehre in the line up, the team would suddenly win the game against Europe....what about the rest of the bech? Those 20 players? They are just going to get better, just like that? Because you change a coach? Nah, I don't buy that. I know that some of you think that with different coach there would be different style, etc., but again, it's the players who play the game. I don't believe for a second that the reason why Pavelski, Byfuglien, Wheeler, Pacioretty, Kane, and basically everyone there sucked because of the coach. It was them who were playing on the ie against Europe. Not the coach. Some of you make it seem like Tortorella is holding players' hands like they were children, telling them exactly what to do and how to play, making plays on the ice, like they don't have "freedom" on the ice to make something happen.
are you for real?
you do know the roster I put out is in a hopeful 2 years time...are you really suggesting that in 2 years Matthews won't be the top center for the US?
the 1991 Canada Cup had Mike Modano and Jeremy Roenick as our top 2 centers along with Pat Lafontaine, both Roenick and Modano were barely 2 plus years in to their careers at the time....Matthews is as elite as those guys were at the same age, if there is an Olympic showing, Matthews will be in the top 2 centers.
you can also flip between Eichel and Matthews for the top center, but Gaudreau and Eichel didn't click hence Matthews slotting in that top spot with Kaner..
Hmm, no where in my post did I suggest Mathews won't be a number 1 center. I wrote that he needed more experience. You're the one with the assumptions not me. You've watched him in a couple of games in a ridiculous tourney and he's already USA'S best center. For you its a sure thing, for myself, I would rather see him play a bit more.
Who is the is the best center for the USA currently? Stepan? This tournament alone Matthews has shown himself to be better than him. Talent wise it's not a question that Matthews and Echiel are the best centers for the US. If you're talking resume, well then yea gotta wait.
Pavelski is pretty good.
I'm used to him as a winger with San Jose. Kind of forgot about him.
I love how the USA management group keeps saying they focused too much on trying to beat Canada as some sort of excuse for why they're out. Especially since the game with Canada wasn't even particularly close.
Who is the is the best center for the USA currently? Stepan? This tournament alone Matthews has shown himself to be better than him. Talent wise it's not a question that Matthews and Echiel are the best centers for the US. If you're talking resume, well then yea gotta wait.
Canada is great as expected, no-one is saying they are not and will not be going forward.
But to suggest they will always be THE dominant team is being far too optimistic and premature IMO.
There have already been instances in the past where they were not.
This, should've owned up to player selection instead, it's clear that both ideas were failures but they'll only admit to one. You have a plethora of offensive talent and you choose to build a glorified NHL club team with an NHL grinding style game?
I don't care what team you're building, as a Lightning fan anyone taking Ryan Callahan over Tyler Johnson to win a hockey game needs to get their head checked.
Agreed, so USA adds Gaurdeau, Eichel, Matthews, and Canada possibly adds McDavid, Mackinnon, Drouin, Ekblad, RNH, to a roster that is already levels ahead of team USA.
Not really sure how it's close unless you're insinuating that the future USA players are levels ahead of the Canadians enough to make up for the current gap.
Claude fricken Giroux would be the American's 1st line center and he's a healthy scratch for Team Canada. Anyone of Tavares, Thornton, Getzlaf, Crosby, Duchene Giroux or Stamkos would've been their 1st line center and most of those guys are depth scorers on Canada.
This, should've owned up to player selection instead, it's clear that both ideas were failures but they'll only admit to one. You have a plethora of offensive talent and you choose to build a glorified NHL club team with an NHL grinding style game?
I don't care what team you're building, as a Lightning fan anyone taking Ryan Callahan over Tyler Johnson to win a hockey game needs to get their head checked.
Uh yeah not in the past 6 years and not looking like it in the next 4 either, no ones saying Canada will be the best for the next 20 years, but for the near future there's no one close to topping the talent level Canada is producing. In 2 years time, they'll have a prime Sidney Crosby and Connor McDavid on the same roster, think about that.
Canada is great as expected, no-one is saying they are not and will not be going forward.
But to suggest they will always be THE dominant team is being far too optimistic and premature IMO.
There have already been instances in the past where they were not.