GDT: WJC, NYE, Canada vs Germany, 1:30 EST

[Jukurit]

Celebrini is a beast!

 

[Barrie22]

Celebrini again puts pressure on the German defense and nearly scores but gets hooked for a pp.

 

[HabSgt]

As long as they stay out of market garden territory

Canada coaching staff: "Let's put a guy deep into the German zone with no puck support....they'll never suspect it!"

 

[Dominance]

I mean....he had zero chance of finding that puck lol it was deflected and he had his own man and the Germany completely covering him.

He’s gotta have at least one of these distant shots.

 

[TheBeastCoast]

What shot attempt? He never had the puck. If you swing at puck then it should be a penalty if you hit the opponent. Only if he actually takes a shot and hits him on the follow through should it be no penalty.

We going to act like one timers aren't a thing or something? That was a shot attempt don't be obtuse.

 

[All the Answers]

According to these idiot refs it does count as a penalty.

You do not know the rules of the game.

 

[Jussi]

4-3!

 

[PanniniClaus]

That was a quality PP

 

[Master P]

Slash? Looked like he got all stick.

 

[karlstegger]

4-3!

 

[TheBeastCoast]

He’s gotta have at least one of these distant shots.

There was one of the first two I thought he should have had forget which one but that 3rd one he had zero shot.

 

[Barrie22]

You do not know the holes of the game.

Follow through on shots has never been a penalty in any league.

 

[HabSgt]

Germany: Do you surrender?

Canada: Nuts!

4-3

 

[OilersFanatics505]

sad that Canada needs a weak slashing call to get the win.

 

[Alerion]

What shot attempt? He never had the puck. If you swing at puck then it should be a penalty if you hit the opponent. Only if he actually takes a shot and hits him on the follow through should it be no penalty.

"However, a Player is permitted “accidental contact” on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal “windup or follow through” of a “shooting motion”'

This is the section of what the poster shared that I was looking at. It was a shooting motion.

There's a different post here now showing a different rule which would have it be a penalty.

I'm familiar with the NHL rule but not the IIHF distinction

 

[Peiskos]

sad that Canada needs a weak slashing call to get the win.

Canada needs to win this game 7-3 range to make up for this performance.

 

[Barrie22]

sad that Canada needs a weak slashing call to get the win.

Sad that Germany needs 2 week major calls to get 2 of there goals.

 

[Dingo]

sad that Canada needs a weak slashing call to get the win.

i have a feeling they will score again

 

[Three On Zero]

Was low key hoping Germany could pull this one out

 

[HabSgt]

Sad that Germany needs 2 week major calls to get 2 of there goals.

They were penalized for 2 weeks?

That the new Supreme Penalty I've been hearing about?

 

[The Gr8 Dane]

Was low key hoping Germany could pull this one out

There's still time!! Don't lose hope they can do it

 

[Krigsgaldr]

They were penalized for 2 weeks?

That the new Supreme Penalty I've been hearing about?

It’s Europe so it’s the penalty royal

 

[Leaf Fans]

sad that Canada needs a weak slashing call to get the win.

The game is not over yet, and they have the lead without a weak slashing call.

 

[hak]

4on4 should favour Canada

 

[HabSgt]

It’s Europe so it’s the penalty royal

Nice

Le Punition Royale avec fromage