Toggle sidebar

Speculation: With the third pick in the 2024 NHL draft the Anaheim Ducks select...(Draft is June 28th @ 4pm PT. ESPN. ESPN+)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who do the Ducks take at pick 3?

  • Ivan Demidov

    Votes: 37 18.3%

  • Anton Silayev

    Votes: 36 17.8%

  • Artyom Levshunov

    Votes: 81 40.1%

  • Cayden Lindstrom

    Votes: 21 10.4%

  • Sam Dickinson

    Votes: 11 5.4%

  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 1 0.5%

  • Zeev Buium

    Votes: 6 3.0%

  • Carter Yakemchuk

    Votes: 5 2.5%

  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 3 1.5%

  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Total voters
    202
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
anezthes

anezthes

Registered User
Mar 20, 2014
4,649
2,857
  • Like
Reactions: Static
Static

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
48,335
35,428
SoCal
Blake Montgomery sounds like another great second round target. Huge kid who can skate and has some skills, overager.
 
WhatTheDuck

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
23,848
17,045
Worst Case, Ontario
Static said:
https://x.com/i/web/status/1798439562680963243
Click to expand...

First saw him u13 or u14 season, was a noticeably smart player even before he started the huge growth spurt, that's part of the huge intrigue for me. It's not just a huge brute bullying a low level of hockey, there has always been some genuine knack for the game there.

His older brother Jace (2004 born) took a huge step forward this season as well. Also a huge kid at 6'5, nearly quadrupled his production from the year prior in the CCHL (Ottawa junior A loop) and was named league MVP. Heading to NCAA with Clarkson and surely has some pro teams tracking his progress.

www.eliteprospects.com

Jace Letourneau - Stats, Contract, Salary & More

Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Jace Letourneau, 2004-03-04 Arnprior, ON, CAN Canada. Most recently in the undefined with Clarkson Univ.. Complete player biography and stats.
www.eliteprospects.com www.eliteprospects.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trojans86 and Static
Reveille1984

Reveille1984

Registered User
Dec 3, 2014
901
478
Static said:
None of these dmen sound all that great. I think I'd rather go for a forward, to be honest. Just sign a top RH dman instead.
Click to expand...
Yeah, if CHI goes Lev at #2 (which I believe they will) and we're willing to get ballsy, I'd much rather take a flyer on Demidov than Silayev. Either that or see if there's any interest in trading down.

Going for a high floor Russian dman at 3OA just seems like a waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anaheim4ever and Hinterland
Zegs2sendhelp

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
41,742
38,215
Static said:
None of these dmen sound all that great. I think I'd rather go for a forward, to be honest. Just sign a top RH dman instead.
Click to expand...
I mean by that logic no one in the draft sounds great, and just trade down or trade the pick.
 

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,299
2,984
Los Angeles, CA
Luckily, our scouts are really good with D and the forwards have different questions. Lindstrom has injury issues (our doctors should be great at identifying injuries and recovery chances at this point) and Demidov has size/Russian factor but undeniable offensive talent. If Ducks draft D, I trust our scouts with who they like. If we go forward (assuming it's one of those two), it's probably more non scouting homework that the Ducks need to do. Those 4 seem to have taken a half step ahead of the other prospects for the most part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Static
Static

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
48,335
35,428
SoCal
Lukas Fischer, son of jiri, is interesting. A week from being 2025 eligible, 6'4" dman with NHL tools. Another lottery ticket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhatTheDuck
FiveTacos

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
872
1,585
The Twilight Zone
Reveille1984 said:
Yeah, if CHI goes Lev at #2 (which I believe they will) and we're willing to get ballsy, I'd much rather take a flyer on Demidov than Silayev. Either that or see if there's any interest in trading down.
Click to expand...

I can't honestly say any of those guys (and throw LIndstrom in there) would be a bad pick. Although depending on which day you catch me, I find myself changing my mind about which guy I'd prefer.

I will say the idea of a Gauthier-Carlsson-Lindstrom line sounds amazing. But so does our D corps with either Lev or Silayev added to the mix.

And Demidov could very conceivably still end up the best player of the bunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84

cheesymc

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
3,980
1,733
Irvine
Visit site
When’s the combine news going to flow through? Didn’t they start around Sunday? No measurements yet? Seems like only Montreal has coverage and media following the combine.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,995
5,872
Visit site
cheesymc said:
When’s the combine news going to flow through? Didn’t they start around Sunday? No measurements yet? Seems like only Montreal has coverage and media following the combine.
Click to expand...
I think measurements are on the last day which I believe is Friday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cheesymc
Anaheim4ever

Anaheim4ever

Registered User
Jun 15, 2017
9,191
5,786
Reveille1984 said:
Yeah, if CHI goes Lev at #2 (which I believe they will) and we're willing to get ballsy, I'd much rather take a flyer on Demidov than Silayev. Either that or see if there's any interest in trading down.

Going for a high floor Russian dman at 3OA just seems like a waste.
Click to expand...
Yeah I take Demidov over Silayev but I'm not expecting Chicago to pass on Demidov.
I feel like Verbeek may pass on Lev due to his hockey IQ and take Dickinson, Silayev or Buium if Demidov isn't available.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,995
5,872
Visit site
Anaheim4ever said:
Yeah I take Demidov over Silayev but I'm not expecting Chicago to pass on Demidov.
I feel like Verbeek may pass on Lev due to his hockey IQ and take Dickinson, Silayev or Buium if Demidov isn't available.
Click to expand...
I don't know which way the Ducks will go with that pick but I do think they will be place a priority on where they think each player will be in 3-5 years. That's what they did with the Carlsson pick at any rate. So who do they think has the highest potential? We'll find out in 22 days. And, oh yeah, size will be a major factor in the decision as well...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anaheim4ever and lwvs84

eaterfan

Registered User
Nov 29, 2023
57
51
It is kind of a bummer that Edmonton is in the Cup Finals. That pick went from 24 to 31 or 32.

I was hoping Eiserman would drop past pick 12 or 13 and the Ducks could package Edmonton's pick with other picks or lower level assets to get up in a position to take him. He's definitely a high risk player, but the Ducks have a lot of young forward depth and if he hits, he could be a consistent 40 goal scorer who takes the Ducks offense to another level. I think the Ducks are pretty uniquely able to take a risk like that because of the young talent in the pipeline. Pair that pick with Levshunov/Silayev at 3 and the prospect pool just got filled to the brim with talent.

I think moving from 31 or 32 to 13-16 will be much harder and require assets I wouldn't want to give up to take a flyer on Eiserman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trojans86
Terry Yake

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
27,498
16,215
eaterfan said:
It is kind of a bummer that Edmonton is in the Cup Finals. That pick went from 24 to 31 or 32.

I was hoping Eiserman would drop past pick 12 or 13 and the Ducks could package Edmonton's pick with other picks or lower level assets to get up in a position to take him. He's definitely a high risk player, but the Ducks have a lot of young forward depth and if he hits, he could be a consistent 40 goal scorer who takes the Ducks offense to another level. I think the Ducks are pretty uniquely able to take a risk like that because of the young talent in the pipeline. Pair that pick with Levshunov/Silayev at 3 and the prospect pool just got filled to the brim with talent.

I think moving from 31 or 32 to 13-16 will be much harder and require assets I wouldn't want to give up to take a flyer on Eiserman.
Click to expand...
still not as bad as in 2010 when the flyers went from barely making the playoffs on the last day of the season to SCF. that pick went from mid/late teens to 29th lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: eaterfan
Anaheim4ever

Anaheim4ever

Registered User
Jun 15, 2017
9,191
5,786
Dr Johnny Fever said:
But ultimately it didn’t matter since we picked Etem with that 29 and would have just picked him earlier after Fowler fell to us at 10 (I think).
Click to expand...
Same thing could happen this years too Madden may already have his tracey/steel 2.0 lined up or a Quebec player in mind for #32 regardless of if they were picking #24 or #32.
 
Hockey Duckie

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,288
13,310
southern cal
Anaheim4ever said:
Same thing could happen this years too Madden may already have his tracey/steel 2.0 lined up or a Quebec player in mind for #32 regardless of if they were picking #24 or #32.
Click to expand...

About the Tracey pick, Murray had a deal in place to move the #29 (Tracey) and #39 (LaCombe) picks up to pick #18, provided Peyton Krebs fell to #18. Vegas drafted him at #17.

huh... LaCombe produced the same amount of points this year in the NHL as Krebs with 17 points, but in nine fewer games played. And this was LaCombe's first full season in the NHL.
 
Rasp

Rasp

Registered User
Apr 9, 2019
1,315
1,896
Hockey Duckie said:
About the Tracey pick, Murray had a deal in place to move the #29 (Tracey) and #39 (LaCombe) picks up to pick #18, provided Peyton Krebs fell to #18. Vegas drafted him at #17.

huh... LaCombe produced the same amount of points this year in the NHL as Krebs with 17 points, but in nine fewer games played. And this was LaCombe's first full season in the NHL.
Click to expand...
We got lucky that deal fell through. Shows that the shotgun approach with picks can work better than going all in on one guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anaheim4ever, Dr Johnny Fever and Boo Boo

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,995
5,872
Visit site
Rasp said:
We got lucky that deal fell through. Shows that the shotgun approach with picks can work better than going all in on one guy
Click to expand...
It shows me that the organization just can't evaluate forwards outside of the top 10. Krebs and Tracey are both bust material while LaCombe will be a serviceable NHL defenseman. It's a trend that must be broken this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trojans86 and dracom

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,995
5,872
Visit site
The Siriusxm hockey prospect guys are doing their top 32 draft ranking tonight. Top 10:
1. Celebrini
2. Levshunov
3. Silayev
4. Buium
5. Dickinson
6. Lindstrom
7. Demidov
8. Helenius
9. Iginla
10. Jiricek
 
Hockey Duckie

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,288
13,310
southern cal
tomd said:
It shows me that the organization just can't evaluate forwards outside of the top 10. Krebs and Tracey are both bust material while LaCombe will be a serviceable NHL defenseman. It's a trend that must be broken this year.
Click to expand...

Well, Colangelo could be that guy. Though, I doubt that's what you meant by breaking the trend this year.
 
Gliff

Gliff

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 24, 2011
16,377
11,504
Middle Tennessee
tomd said:
The Siriusxm hockey prospect guys are doing their top 32 draft ranking tonight. Top 10:
1. Celebrini
2. Levshunov
3. Silayev
4. Buium
5. Dickinson
6. Lindstrom
7. Demidov
8. Helenius
9. Iginla
10. Jiricek
Click to expand...
They are the same guys that put out the3 Black Book every year.

I like EP's draft guide a lot more, but its a good source.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X