With the 14th overall selection in the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, the Pittsburgh Penguins select…

Who would YOU take with the Penguins pick?

  • Matthew Wood-LW/C/RW

  • Nate Danielson-C

  • Riley Heidt-LW/C/RW

  • Axel Sandin Pellikka-D

  • Colby Barlow-LW

  • Trade the pick for- (insert your player trade)

  • Brayden Yager-C

  • Andrew Cristall-LW

  • Ryan Leonard-C

  • Other-

  • Trade up/down- (insert your deal)

  • Eduard Sale-RW

  • David Reinbacher-D


Results are only viewable after voting.

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
5,027
4,674
Sacramento, CA
I'm leery of drafting a D. This team isn't very good at it. They've drafted exactly 2 top 4 D since 2005. Plus the system is completely void of forward talent. At least on D you might have Smith and Pickering.
Defense is so far from a need. They need someone who can bury a damn puck, or, someone who can make a high danger save. That's all. Not a defender.
 

Big Friggin Dummy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
26,203
25,484
I don't think this team can really turn its nose up at drafting anybody based on position. They could use anything and everything, and even by the most optimistic standards, odds are whoever is picked isn't gonna be seeing NHL ice time until after Sid's done anyway.

Just go with BPA and hope you actually land the BPA, and don't end up looking back in like a decade and grumbling because you ended up with a Broz instead of a Pastrnak. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Buddy Bizarre

Registered User
Jul 9, 2021
6,448
4,624
I don't think this team can really turn its nose up at drafting anybody based on position. They could use anything and everything, and even by the most optimistic standards, odds are whoever is picked isn't gonna be seeing NHL ice time until after Sid's done anyway.

Just got with BPA and hope you actually land the BPA, and don't end up looking back in like a decade and grumbling because you ended up with a Broz instead of a Pastrnak. :laugh:

Exactly my thought. BPA should be the mantra for the next few drafts
 

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,239
5,241
burgh
Exactly my thought. BPA should be the mantra for the next few drafts
with how high we are picking and the way players are scattered, tells me in the group we are going to pick from are all fairly even. so rather than picked someone who is .001 better than someone else, I think you need to pick the hardest pos. to fill. (rd or a center, and a rh one would be even better) now if someone drops, then sure pick t.b.p.a.
edit; you can add the highest upside too.:laugh:
 

McGroarty2

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,270
2,227
PA
Changed my selection with Dubas all aboard. I think Matthew Wood is now going to be the pick.
4176C4E0-5B55-4D17-97AA-0D0CE5651FE1.gif
 

Lust for Life

Registered User
Jun 30, 2018
889
1,161
Something interesting to consider: either pick 14th or trade back a few positions to get more picks?
 

WickedWrister

Registered User
Jul 25, 2008
11,334
6,001
Philadelphia
Something interesting to consider: either pick 14th or trade back a few positions to get more picks?
Yeah, I think this is probably going to be the play. Trade back, recoup that 2nd round pick + future assets. Restock the cupboard. IIRC trading back was his first official move as GM of the Leafs when he took over back in 2018.
 
Last edited:

CallArnoldSlick

Party Fowl
May 21, 2010
559
607
A trade back could help clear dead cap space off the books. Last year Dubas traded 25th overall for 38th overall to get rid of Petr Mrazek. A first round pick at 14 probably isn't going to provide any more chance at immediate help to the Penguins compared to a late first or early second (and quite frankly has about the same likelihood to work out in general), so it could be a move to help the current roster while still adding a decent prospect for the future.

Also, Dubas traded the Leafs' first rounder in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, so a move is certainly possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WickedWrister

Pens x

Registered User
Oct 8, 2016
16,404
8,187
He’s trading the pick unless he isn’t trying to truly contend.
 

Lust for Life

Registered User
Jun 30, 2018
889
1,161
Just how many picks and what round would you expect to receive to move back even ten or fifteen spots?

Looking back at the straight up draft pick deals the last few years:

2022: Coyotes traded #11 for #27, #34 and #45
2021: Red Wings traded #15 for #23, #48 and #138
2021: Wild traded #20 for #22 and #90
2019: Coyotes traded #11 for #14 and #45

So something in that area, moving back 2-8-ish spots for an additional second rounder. Depending of course of trade partners in that area that want to move up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
50,317
27,093
Anyone have 2 late 1sts? That’s probably fair value for a 12-15 pick.
 

Lust for Life

Registered User
Jun 30, 2018
889
1,161
Anyone have 2 late 1sts? That’s probably fair value for a 12-15 pick.

St. Louis have #25 and #29. Sharks have #26 and #36 for an early 2nd rounder.

Edit: Red Wings have #17 and then #41, 42 and 43. They might be more willing to part with one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
18,284
31,332
Pittsburghish
He’s trading the pick unless he isn’t trying to truly contend.
That's not true. In the spot we're in, if a player falls it would probably be more valuable to draft that guy and use him as a trade chip like Shero did with Esposito. Having a prospect with name recognition is a more valuable asset than an unknown mid-late 1st.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaded-Fan

Pens x

Registered User
Oct 8, 2016
16,404
8,187
That's not true. In the spot we're in, if a player falls it would probably be more valuable to draft that guy and use him as a trade chip like Shero did with Esposito. Having a prospect with name recognition is a more valuable asset than an unknown mid-late 1st.
Are people knocking down our door for Pickering? I wasn’t aware.
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,601
11,716
He’s trading the pick unless he isn’t trying to truly contend.
He's not trading the pick, stop it! The only positive from last season is that we got 14th OA. He can make that pick and still build a competitive team.

Why the hell would you trade a pick in a deep draft considering our prospect pool is nearly empty? It makes no sense. Trading 14 OA doesn't make us a cup contender, my lord!

Are people knocking down our door for Pickering? I wasn’t aware.
Pickering was what 21 or 23 OA in a ho hum draft? You're comparing apples to oranges.
 

Lust for Life

Registered User
Jun 30, 2018
889
1,161
Found this link while browsing other message boards: Realgud draft simulator

Allows you to simulate the draft this year, this was my draft:

14 (1). Brayden Yager (C)
90 (3). Hunter Brzustewicz (RD)
142 (5). Matthew Mania (RD)
174 (6). Isac Born (C)
217 (7). Jan Spunar (G)
221 (7). Justin Kipkie (LD)

Obviously nothing more than a fun five minutes when you're bored at work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
50,317
27,093
My picks:14 (1). Axel Sandin Pellikka (RD)
90 (3). William Whitelaw (RW)
142 (5). Jaden Lipinski (C)
174 (6). Damian Clara (G)
217 (7). Jordan Tourigny (RD)
221 (7). Ty Higgins (RD)

Just went by name vibes and stats for the later picks.

Couple productive forwards, a huge goalie, a couple productive, smaller RD.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad