Winnipeg Jets going into the 24/25 season

What do you feel is the top Priority for 2024-2025?

  • New Special Team Coach (replace Lauer)

    Votes: 33 21.2%
  • New Head Coach (replace Bowness)

    Votes: 14 9.0%
  • Replace both coaches (replace Bowness and Lauer)

    Votes: 68 43.6%
  • New General Manager (replace Cheveldayoff)

    Votes: 16 10.3%
  • Trade Forwards/picks for improved Defense core. (Replacements for Pionk & Stanley)

    Votes: 49 31.4%
  • Improved process to integrate youth (mostly our prospects) into the NHL club and give longer leash

    Votes: 33 21.2%
  • Ensure strong Back-up Goalie (like Brossoit) and give MINIMUM of 30 games (Load Mgmt for Helly)

    Votes: 4 2.6%
  • Trade Vezina Helly if we get a great offer

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Create time travel (or borrow this current tech from the CIA) and bring back Prime Byfuglien

    Votes: 17 10.9%
  • Trade multiple Players for picks - start mini Re-build

    Votes: 6 3.8%

  • Total voters
    156
  • Poll closed .

Heldig

Registered User
Apr 12, 2002
17,647
11,341
BC
100% - but Jets are trapped with Lowry as 3C... guy is heart and soul but he's an anchor for Lambert or Chib.... then he also turns Barlow or McGro into career 3rd liners... maybe Barron-Lowry-Chib works but the team is married to Iafallo and Apples... gotta be a crazy dynamic in that room

Im the Barron version of your Perfetti fandom... I just see TNSE going down EXACTLY the same road they went with Copp and developing a solid player only to take him to arbitration this year to save a fkn pittance - and alienate him from the org... then basically bury him.

I think stuff like that gets around the league far more than signing or not signing guys... arbitration should be avoided at all costs when you're developing a guy. Jets seem fine with it

Save $50 to lose $500...
Dont like the word "trapped" for Lowry. As you said, he is a heart and soul player on the Jets. One could argue that our coaching has been inordinately fixated with certain pairings over the years:

Connor - Scheifele
Lowry - Appleton
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,723
16,641
Dont like the word "trapped" for Lowry. As you said, he is a heart and soul player on the Jets. One could argue that our coaching has been inordinately fixated with certain pairings over the years:

Connor - Scheifele
Lowry - Appleton
Add copp-lowry to that list... trapped with a checking line - I say trapped because lowry is heart and soul so we can't move away from him but his line is really one dimensional - as we are seeing more and more shutdown lines also need teeth
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,946
31,454
That's fair. But how much value to teams put into those round picks.

Fair points but I just don't see how you win a cup without bolstering your lineup going into the playoffs. Pretty much every team did it and there would have been outrage had we done nothing.

Rangers gave up
a 4th (potential 3rd)
4th
2nd
4th (potential 3rd)

Dallas gave up
4th
2nd
Conditional 3rd

Edmonton gave up
1st
4th
4th
5th

Florida gave up:
3rd
4th (potential 3rd)


Plus all the other teams no longer in the playoffs that gave up top picks. Just don't see how you expect to win the cup without filling holes and improving the roster. We were a top 5 team in the league, showed times of absolute dominance. I honestly don't know how you don't take a gamble and go for it, especially the prices we paid. We go to the finals or win the cup, I wonder if the mindset changes about giving up picks to improve the roster.

This year was a perfect storm of justification for buying at the deadline. It didn't work out.

But, in general, if you spend those same assets over time to acquire players with term, who fit team needs, you will have fewer holes to plug at the deadline. In fact I could make the argument that that is how the Jets created this year's perfect storm. If they had acquired fewer rentals in the past and more players with term then this year's PO might have worked out better. With or without the rentals.

The argument that everyone else is doing it doesn't stand up to examination. If everyone else is jumping off a bridge do you think it is a good idea to jump off a bridge? The TD is the time when futures have the lowest value. Trade them when their value is higher and get assets with term.

I don’t expect to win a cup with this core anymore that’s the biggest piece.

Here is my exception to this. If we want to buy in to what I think is the fools gold fine with one condition. We need to have the ledger balance out over time. In the years where we miss the playoffs we sell off hard to get back similar draft capital.

For the most part over time I think we have done a reasonable job with this.

In a perfect situation we trade for assets to (maybe) help for a playoff run but we get them with an extra year or extend them if they fit in.

I get that teams all “load up” I’m just not sold it helps as much as most people think. I think it can f*** over guys that got the team there and disrupt team chemistry at times. I realize I am alone in this one lol. In a market like Winnipeg where it’s tough to attract free agents I would like to be a bit more strategic.

I've been banging on that drum for 10 years. You certainly are not alone.

Picks, prospects, players and cap space are all assets. Winnipeg needs to maximize the value of all of those assets.

I think we have only had two real graduates from the 2nd and 3rd round in all of jets 2.0 history.. Lowry and samberg

Yup. That's not performance.

And we have graduated precisely 1 player from the last 6 drafts so far. The last couple of draft classes show promise, but nothing has actually happened yet.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,069
28,555
if the Jets can't find a 2C in trade, i wouldnt' be mad with Names back there. prior to Monahan's acquisition, Names+2nd line was performing just fine, and monahan decided to do Halloween in April turning into a Playoff Ghost. It pains to see the Jets over the years give up multiple 1sts (Stastny, Hayes, Monahan, then consider Eakin & the failed PLD era) for 2C (primarily rentals), meanwhile somehow Vancouver gets JT Miller for years for a mere late-ish 1st & a 3rd & has been outperforming Scheifele quite handidly.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,364
20,339
Sure, Toffoli looked like a good acquisition at the time. But your way of making the point about the value of the picks is just wrong. First, a low success rate simply means they need more of those picks, not fewer. And second, you demonstrate that the Jets need to do a better job drafting and developing.
I'll use this reasoning when I explain to my wife that I've spent our entire life savings on 649 tickets
 

Orrrules

Registered User
Mar 6, 2021
2,434
3,609
Add copp-lowry to that list... trapped with a checking line - I say trapped because lowry is heart and soul so we can't move away from him but his line is really one dimensional - as we are seeing more and more shutdown lines also need teeth
Wouldn't have to be that way if our top 6 could play a two way game. Time for change in the top 6 to two way players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: voyageur

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,946
31,454
I'll use this reasoning when I explain to my wife that I've spent our entire life savings on 649 tickets

:laugh: Good luck with that.

Of course that would be the equivalent of trading all of our other assets, players, 1st rd picks, etc in exchange for 2nd and 3rd rd picks.

What this team needs is some progression from some kids as our core guys and key vets are all at the tops or past the pinnacle of their impact years.

We need Cole play at his first half and then some level all year. If he can do that while transitioning to center even better.

Snerg needs to be able to be that second pairing shut down dmen that can make a solid breakout pass. That will go a long way to solidifying the second pairing.

Ville needs step into a bottom pairing and provide Schmidt type defensive results while being an improvement in terms of breakout and pp.

We probably also need one of our young forwards to make it in a sheltered scoring role and provide some secondary scoring.

If Chevy can get a physical upgrade at RD to give us an elite top pairing and the push DeMelo down to anchor another pairing then I think we are in better shape.

Sure - but I don't think we can count on DeMelo being back.

Top tier rentals, like we did. And that's exactly it. You're not getting anyone highly skilled with term and success rate in the draft is minimal. So why not use them for 30+ goal scorers.

Because then you get Toffoli, who moves on. You have a nice 1st rd exit and nothing left to show for it.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,439
9,785
Add copp-lowry to that list... trapped with a checking line - I say trapped because lowry is heart and soul so we can't move away from him but his line is really one dimensional - as we are seeing more and more shutdown lines also need teeth
His line won game 1. I wonder if Nino had been healthy if that line would have had more teeth...No Barron either, and no Namestnikov limited options. Can't complain when your 3rd line centre outperforms a 2nd line C/W in Copp, at $2 4 million less...If Lowry played in Boston or New York he'd have been a Selke finalist. Still underappreciated...Closest the Jets have to a grind line like Lundell's line on Florida is Lowry's, in terms of sustained zone pressure and hard shifts in the offensive zone.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,946
31,454
I think Chevy is trying to sign DD and Mono right now.

The last statements from the UFA players was that there had been no offers made. That was a while ago and may have changed but AFAIK nothing has been said publicly. Leaving it this late to even make offers won't put those players in a mood to sign team friendly contracts. They may think they can get more elsewhere.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,439
9,785
The last statements from the UFA players was that there had been no offers made. That was a while ago and may have changed but AFAIK nothing has been said publicly. Leaving it this late to even make offers won't put those players in a mood to sign team friendly contracts. They may think they can get more elsewhere.
Hard to say the hope with De Melo is that you let him see what the market has to offer, and match any offer. But I think it could get high for a player who had his breakout season last year. If I was De Melo I'd want to know what the league thinks he's worth before signing any extension...there's always teams trying to improve....with Bouchard, Hronek and Seider all RFAs, agents might want to wait those contracts out...after those contracts, I think De Melo now slots in with Pesce and Tanev. Maybe above both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,449
12,629
The last statements from the UFA players was that there had been no offers made. That was a while ago and may have changed but AFAIK nothing has been said publicly. Leaving it this late to even make offers won't put those players in a mood to sign team friendly contracts. They may think they can get more elsewhere.
Those statements were about a month ago. A lot can happen in a month.
 

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
35,556
33,898
We would be a better team with the cap space back and moving on from Pionk and Schmidt. We do need to replace them but neither are top 4 D men consistently anymore IMO.

On the other hand Losing DeMelo would hurt. He is an effective top 4 D asset that can play on the top pair with Morrissey if need be.

Dillon brings physicality and can hold down the #4 spot still with the right partner. He’s aging so the money and the term would need to make sense.

Losing Demelo and Dillon while retaining Schmidt and Pionk could drop us back to 2019-20 level Jets D.
 

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,571
6,082
This year was a perfect storm of justification for buying at the deadline. It didn't work out.

But, in general, if you spend those same assets over time to acquire players with term, who fit team needs, you will have fewer holes to plug at the deadline. In fact I could make the argument that that is how the Jets created this year's perfect storm. If they had acquired fewer rentals in the past and more players with term then this year's PO might have worked out better. With or without the rentals.

The argument that everyone else is doing it doesn't stand up to examination. If everyone else is jumping off a bridge do you think it is a good idea to jump off a bridge? The TD is the time when futures have the lowest value. Trade them when their value is higher and get assets with term.
Well....no. That's just not true at all because of how cap space grows through the year.The Jets did and have spent close to the cap. They did pretty much all the could do for an opening night roster this year. The Jets managed the cap by trading Little's contract for example so they could have a little cap space at the beginning of the season that grew to over $5 million which allowed them to fill some more holes that they weren't able to at the beginning of the season.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,946
31,454
Well....no. That's just not true at all because of how cap space grows through the year.The Jets did and have spent close to the cap. They did pretty much all the could do for an opening night roster this year. The Jets managed the cap by trading Little's contract for example so they could have a little cap space at the beginning of the season that grew to over $5 million which allowed them to fill some more holes that they weren't able to at the beginning of the season.

They might be trading assets for players with lower cap hits. It is an ongoing process, year after year. Take whatever you would have given up for rentals and use it to upgrade your roster when the assets have their highest value. Keep doing that. When you can't make good deals hang on to the assets.

Those statements were about a month ago. A lot can happen in a month.

Sure. But I haven't heard a peep since then.

I think some players may have their noses out of joint because they didn't get an offer much sooner. They may have already decided to test the market, or are leaning that way.
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,142
10,133
They might be trading assets for players with lower cap hits. It is an ongoing process, year after year. Take whatever you would have given up for rentals and use it to upgrade your roster when the assets have their highest value. Keep doing that. When you can't make good deals hang on to the assets.



Sure. But I haven't heard a peep since then.

I think some players may have their noses out of joint because they didn't get an offer much sooner. They may have already decided to test the market, or are leaning that way.
Keeping assets doesn’t always equal higher value. If there is not much interest say a second, you say I’ll keep him and he drops to waiver wire. It’s impossible to know that the 2nd was going to be the highest value.
 

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,571
6,082
The last statements from the UFA players was that there had been no offers made. That was a while ago and may have changed but AFAIK nothing has been said publicly. Leaving it this late to even make offers won't put those players in a mood to sign team friendly contracts. They may think they can get more elsewhere.
This isn't the Habs organization that leaks everything that crosses their minds to LeBrun. I'm sure the Jets are talking to everyone that needs talking to.

Because then you get Toffoli, who moves on. You have a nice 1st rd exit and nothing left to show for it.
You also said when they keep the picks they have nothing to show for it. You might as well take your best shot at the Cup you can when you finish 4th in the league. Especially from what I have read is a pretty weak draft after the first half of the 1st round.
 

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,571
6,082
They might be trading assets for players with lower cap hits. It is an ongoing process, year after year. Take whatever you would have given up for rentals and use it to upgrade your roster when the assets have their highest value. Keep doing that. When you can't make good deals hang on to the assets.
But there is no more cap space for those assets. There is only space at the TDL.
 

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,571
6,082
100% - but Jets are trapped with Lowry as 3C... guy is heart and soul but he's an anchor for Lambert or Chib.... then he also turns Barlow or McGro into career 3rd liners... maybe Barron-Lowry-Chib works but the team is married to Iafallo and Apples... gotta be a crazy dynamic in that room

Im the Barron version of your Perfetti fandom... I just see TNSE going down EXACTLY the same road they went with Copp and developing a solid player only to take him to arbitration this year to save a fkn pittance - and alienate him from the org... then basically bury him.

I think stuff like that gets around the league far more than signing or not signing guys... arbitration should be avoided at all costs when you're developing a guy. Jets seem fine with it

Save $50 to lose $500...
The Jets played Copp perfectly. I'm not mad the Jets aren't paying him $5.6m to score 30 points.
 

DiggerD

Registered User
Nov 21, 2014
383
538
His line won game 1. I wonder if Nino had been healthy if that line would have had more teeth...No Barron either, and no Namestnikov limited options. Can't complain when your 3rd line centre outperforms a 2nd line C/W in Copp, at $2 4 million less...If Lowry played in Boston or New York he'd have been a Selke finalist. Still underappreciated...Closest the Jets have to a grind line like Lundell's line on Florida is Lowry's, in terms of sustained zone pressure and hard shifts in the offensive zone.
100%, guy finishes top 10 in Selke votes, gets rave reviews from other markets, and here he gets "Jets are trapped with Lowry......" The Jets have a luxury, that most teams don't have, they have a "3rd line" that battles other team's top line, successfully, allowing the top line to face predominantly 2nd line opponents, and the second scoring line to battle their 3rd lines. What kind of numbers would the top line have had facing MacKinnon's line all series?
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,449
12,629
100%, guy finishes top 10 in Selke votes, gets rave reviews from other markets, and here he gets "Jets are trapped with Lowry......" The Jets have a luxury, that most teams don't have, they have a "3rd line" that battles other team's top line, successfully, allowing the top line to face predominantly 2nd line opponents, and the second scoring line to battle their 3rd lines. What kind of numbers would the top line have had facing MacKinnon's line all series?
Not to mention he shows up EVERY game in the playoffs. Quite underpaid in my opinion.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,871
74,963
Winnipeg
100%, guy finishes top 10 in Selke votes, gets rave reviews from other markets, and here he gets "Jets are trapped with Lowry......" The Jets have a luxury, that most teams don't have, they have a "3rd line" that battles other team's top line, successfully, allowing the top line to face predominantly 2nd line opponents, and the second scoring line to battle their 3rd lines. What kind of numbers would the top line have had facing MacKinnon's line all series?

He's good at what he does but is limited offensively. The third line was much better this year due to Nino bringing some much needed offense to it. It made it more multidimensional.

The issue isn't the third line it's our insistence to play Mark and KC together which creates a liability first line.

The middle 6 was the strong part of the the team most of the year.

Also there are other ways to open up some spots for kids. If the org took minutes away from the Scheifele line and took the reigns off the fourth line a bit, we could groom a Lambert next to Namestnikov and Iafallo next year.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,946
31,454
But there is no more cap space for those assets. There is only space at the TDL.

If they trade players for assets with lower cap hits then cap space is not a problem.

Yes, there is more cap space at the TD. That sucks GMs into making bad trades. Rentals are still overpriced but GMs go for them because their cap hits are low. Extreme examples of short term thinking.

This isn't the Habs organization that leaks everything that crosses their minds to LeBrun. I'm sure the Jets are talking to everyone that needs talking to.


You also said when they keep the picks they have nothing to show for it. You might as well take your best shot at the Cup you can when you finish 4th in the league. Especially from what I have read is a pretty weak draft after the first half of the 1st round.

Doesn't matter. We have no choice but to go on whatever information we have - or to make it up.

We don't know who they are talking to or who they are not talking to. And we don't know who has told them to get lost.

No, I never said they have nothing to show for keeping the picks.

I was all in favour of going for it this year - because it was a very unusual year. In general, I am opposed to the higher priced rentals. I am all in favour of getting bargain bin ones like Namestnikov.
 

Thechozen1

Registered User
Sep 8, 2021
2,736
3,940
What teams out there could be looking for a veteran RHD (Pionk) to potentially add some leadership to a younger team trying to push for the playoffs or flip next deadline? Team’s aggressively looking to stockpile picks (Chicago, San Jose, Columbus) are active like this.

Are there any teams with high priced UFA’s they won’t be able to retain that could look to him as an alternative replacement?

One way or another the makeup of this team needs to change and if Chevy could find a dance partner for a younger less established player or strictly replenish with picks then that’s the way to go. It’s that or a Schmidt buyout. Doubtful both happen, but that could open up space for something nobody’s expecting.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,439
9,785
We would be a better team with the cap space back and moving on from Pionk and Schmidt. We do need to replace them but neither are top 4 D men consistently anymore IMO.

On the other hand Losing DeMelo would hurt. He is an effective top 4 D asset that can play on the top pair with Morrissey if need be.

Dillon brings physicality and can hold down the #4 spot still with the right partner. He’s aging so the money and the term would need to make sense.

Losing Demelo and Dillon while retaining Schmidt and Pionk could drop us back to 2019-20 level Jets D.

I definitely think Schmidt's -5 in 3 playoff games was the writing on the wall...

Pionk has a terrible playoffs, but he still can play. I'd like to see what a full season of him and Samberg looks like. Chemistry comes from experience, like the Oilers defense has pretty much looked the same for the 2 and 1/4 seasons now. The Jets have given them some time together...last year I think they were broken up because Dillon-Schmidt were pretty slow together, moving on from those 2 sould improve the overall skating potential of the Jets defense...but I do like the idea of Pionk, who is usually the outlet passer, having a d-man who can shoot the gaps with speed as his d-partner...

I agree that De Melo is the priority...

Let's say that Lou is willing to give up draft picks for players, as he tends to: a 1st, 2nd, and maybe another 2nd next year for Ehlers. Maybe get a roster player like Czikas, as faceoffs are always a challenge around these parts. If we flipped our high 2nd, could we get Liljegren out of Toronto? I know that's a guy Chevy had some interest in. Leafs are in some Cap trouble if they want to sign Domi, Bertuzzi and Edmunson.

Is a defense of Morrissey-De Melo, Samberg-Pionk, Stanley-Liljegren better or worse than last year's defense? Other than Big Stan they all skate well...Liljegren could potentially take Pionk's PK minutes, and exceed his ice time if he gets PP2 too.

Forwards maybe you run

Connor-Scheifele-Vilardi

Nino-Perfetti-Lambert

Namestnikov-Lowry-Appleton

Sign Clutterbuck and have a checking line of Barron-Czikas-Clutterbuck, that can wear defenses down, by hitting them. Iafallo can fit in a few spots in the lineup. Gustafsson too.


That would be a different looking Jets team, maybe not that easy to play against with some speed and size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BarnabyJones PI

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad