It's not a matter of seeing the best in everyone, necessarily. There have been players that made the team that made me scratch my head over the years. I just know what I saw in Struthers and figured this was a kid who had the potential to be another fairly solid FA signing. Was I wrong? Yep. (Though, I'd still be intrigued by what he could do with full ice time)
but after all the guys that youve seen things in that have not turned out, at some point you need to be self aware and say 'im wrong more then im right, so lets not assume he will be more then just a guy' (its not just you buy the way, im wrong alot too, i just dont run to post my thoughts until i know for sure one way or another).
if you remember, almost everyone was telling you the comparison to peer was unfair because struthers was cut by two other teams where as peer was a pure free agent. you fraught us all, for the 5th or 6th time.
i think you really really want to see the best, instead of just seeing what actually is.
You probably should hold off when a new kid arrives. You made those comments in pre-season when he looked good against rookies and junior B players. Your not the only one that does that.
especially when the kid was cut by two other teams, it was as predicted, another latta or mizzi.
this is kind of what im getting at, we dont need to make the kid into something before he proves it first. lets just let the kid play without comparing him to someone higher end.