There are defensive breakdowns leading to most goals, no doubt. The issues are who was it that neglected to even minimally physically take their man and reduce the scoring chance? Watching 74 an 94 make no attempts to physically check their men and then watch them develop and score off of a low risk opportunity is what frustrates me. Basically half ass efforts stops a few of Sarnia’s goals today. Did that happen? No. Tom's needs to ride the pine until the wood rots and a couple of others can do the same imo. Sure ive picked on 74 for good reason, but look also at Peer, has 44 points and is still a -15. WTF That's the problem,l. If people think scoring a bunch of points while allowing more against you at even strength is acceptable. It's not. It equates to loses. Peer has 6 points in last 5 games and is still a -3 over that stretch. Is that supposed to be impressive? 74 and 94 are too soft too play at the CHL level.