ohloutsider
Registered User
He plays the same game that LE did. All about breakaways and goals. Great on the PP. He will have his moments but not consistent on the back check.Is Peer good defensively; good in his own zone; backchecks?
He plays the same game that LE did. All about breakaways and goals. Great on the PP. He will have his moments but not consistent on the back check.Is Peer good defensively; good in his own zone; backchecks?
Rarely back checks.He plays the same game that LE did. All about breakaways and goals. Great on the PP. He will have his moments but not consistent on the back check.
Just a heads up that HFBOARDS system no longer likes Hotmail email accounts to log in with. I am only speaking of my personal experience recently and spoke with a system specialist. If you are having issues like unable to reply or hit like etc. Log in and change your email address on your account to a Gmail or other email provider other than a Hotmail.
I thought maybe I was being scolded for something I was nit aware of and decided to get to the bottom of it lol.That explains a lot. Since training camp, I've had issues on various devices where I couldn't login here or there. Appreciate the heads up!
I thought maybe I was being scolded for something I was nit aware of and decided to get to the bottom of it lol.
I’ve had mobile log in issues with yahoo.That explains a lot. Since training camp, I've had issues on various devices where I couldn't login here or there. Appreciate the heads up!
Since I went to my Gmail account, it has been stellar. I first tried setting it to my wife's Hotmail account and same thing. Notta.I’ve had mobile log in issues with yahoo.
Nothing shocking thereCostanzo in goal. Same normal scratches. Winegard out, Toms in.
Windsor got a break?Surprised they didn't review Offsides on that Morneau Goal and surprised Abraham didn't get a call leaving his feet and targeting Kayden Pitre right in the dome. I guess we may be due for a couple call our way, but that Abraham hit was dirty, can't believe that result in a PP Goal.
Being greedy is fine but there's no guarantee of 4th or 5th either. Maybe the franchise would be happy with 2 home playoff games. You can't complain if it delays the rebuild another year or two. Be greedy but you can't have it both ways.Nice win. Was worried for the the last 2 periods but they hung in there.
Abraham hit. Surprised he can get that high but looked like a check to the head by me. I guess the hockey gods are paying the Spits back on the missed call on the Christoforo hit.
Costanzo has looked much better as of late. A steady performance from a goalie can go a long way to giving the lads up front some confidence they can win. I think he can be better but for now we will take the improvement.
Toms/Winegard- not sure who gets the nod here but Tom's has more experience and to be fair looked OK last night, except 1 bad giveaway. Do you stick with him or develop Winegard? I'm hopinging an 08 pushes them both out next year.
Walton scoring the game winner was fun. Quite the interview.
Greentree on the empty netter had plenty of time to shoot himself but chose to pass it off to Maillet to score. That is something a captain of a team would do, just sayin'.
Making the playoffs is within reach. Now is that what the GM really wants? Picking 4th or 5th is likely not a big deal but having a shot at 1st or 2nd is. Either way I would prefer them to be competitive every night and still get a high pick. Greedy much is what fans do so I guess that is what I want. Stay safe.
Yes I know I don't get it both ways but picking anywhere this year in the top 5 is not going to have any impact on a rebuild.Being greedy is fine but there's no guarantee of 4th or 5th either. Maybe the franchise would be happy with 2 home playoff games. You can't complain if it delays the rebuild another year or two. Be greedy but you can't have it both ways.
Being better defensively in your own zone.The fact Abraham hit head and left his feet to do it, I was thinking suspension… Instead we got a powerplay goal out of it.
If Flint wants to argue that, I get it. I’m all for big hits and a physical game, but that was an intentional dangerous hit.
Costanzo has looked far superior lately to his Pre-Christmas performance. While the one game we saw out of Michelone, I kind of had an “uh-oh” feeling where he reminded me more of the version I wasn’t so impressed with in Flint. Very small sample, he’ll get a game this weekend.
I roll Winegard (05) over Toms (06). Ultimately, yeah, I’d love a younger D man out there next year. An 08 would be great, but anything 06-08, I’d take.
With our current 05 Crop (Winegard, Outwater, Eichler/Import, Costanzo, Martin) I only see Joey as an OA. Winegard isn’t a game changer, but his size is appealing. I don’t hate Toms, but as an 04? Meh. He’s not a key part of future success and I doubt more ice time raises his trade value much from what we spent. I see Winegard earning a spot next year over Toms as an OA.
Things could be shaken up, but looking at Christoforo, Woodall, Walton, Eichler as a D core next year I don’t hate. Room to add an 04’ OA to push one of the above 4 into the bottom pairing.
Christoforo isn’t horrible. He’s in year 2 of a potential 5. Offensive minded and undersized. He adapted to the league well early. I’m not sure his ceiling, he has room to grow, and I think he will. I’m just a bit afraid we all over estimated his potential based on a good first year, when he was working with a more talented group where he could play a bit more risky and it wouldn’t come back and bite us.
The thing I like about these 4 staying is they all bring different things. Christoforo Offensive Defensemen, Woodall good vision/playmaker, Walton more of a stay at home D man, and Eichler bringing some physicality.
I think this board just hates offensive D men. Turnovers and odd man rushes will happen with this style of player, regardless of who it is. I’d take Christoforo over Henault personally.
Christoforo isn’t horrible. He’s in year 2 of a potential 5. Offensive minded and undersized. He adapted to the league well early. I’m not sure his ceiling, he has room to grow, and I think he will. I’m just a bit afraid we all over estimated his potential based on a good first year, when he was working with a more talented group where he could play a bit more risky and it wouldn’t come back and bite us.
Don't agree.One thing I can't help but think about with him... every time we draft a smaller defenceman with offensive potential, we expect him to be like Ryan Ellis, who could also hit very well. Bateman was a bust. Auger was a bust. Cristoforo is solid offensively, needs some work defensively, but is more of a defensive position guy than a Ellis-style "hit them so they know you're there" guy. Not every d-man is going to ram you into the boards; people don't like that. "HIT HIM!!" That's not how the game always works. However, he's learning, is only 17, and has plenty of room to grow. It probably doesn't help that Greentree has exploded in every part of his game as we tend to compare players from the same draft. Cristoforo's going to take time to develop. If he's still like this by age 19, then I'd scratch my head. Until then, man, he's still a kid...