OHLTG
Registered User
Sorry, not sure what Hunter's "magic" has to do with this. The question was about where they pick in the round.
It's listed as Ottawa. They have two 1sts. I'm not sure on the reason.
Windsor Spitfires 2023-24 Off-Season Thread (Part 2)
- Thread starter SoupNazi
- Start date
- Status
Sorry, not sure what Hunter's "magic" has to do with this. The question was about where they pick in the round.
It's listed as Ottawa. They have two 1sts. I'm not sure on the reason.
ohloutsider
Registered User
OHLTG
Registered User
I was thinking it had to do with that but was having issues putting the pieces together.
Because of the trade they made with London,their 1st rounder from last year
a dman forgot his name,his brother plays for Kitchener.
OHLTG
Registered User
Hunter Brzustewicz; I remember that because I told you during camp just after it happened haha
ohloutsider
Registered User
London has that pick because their 1st round pick did not report ( Moore) but they declared too late so their comp pick is in the 2nd round. Don't see any magic with that move? More of a mismanagement of assets.
Starting to get really excited, looking at all those top-75 picks. Add in the #3 import, and this is the most important draft in years. Staying reserved, for now, because the coaching staff hires have to hit.
Anybody have any idea of candidates? Any names on anyone’s radar they’d like?
Anybody have any idea of candidates? Any names on anyone’s radar they’d like?
4 Bobby ORR
Registered User
Yes, I believe first round comps need to be traded before the season starts. Hence London got the second round pick at the spot Moore was picked (18th in the second round)
Sobolev would’ve helped this year, but didn’t justify an OA and Import Spot because of the quantity and quality of our other OAs. The reason we held Jodoin is because no one else wanted to pay anything, and Christopoulos ended up injured.
I doubt we hold Zhugin for a same but opposite. Zhugin would make a fine OA with what we have, but to eat up an import spot? Eichlers still on the C.S. List for the draft is he not? Curious to see if he has his name called.
D is needed, sure, some in the draft, but I agree there is urgency to build around the 06’s. Greentree will not be an overager here. We all want a gritty D I’m sure, but that’s what I’m paying for as an 05’.
It’s a lot easier to draft 2-3 forwards and have them impact the team immediately than a D man. Bring in something that’s proven in this league.
If Joeys confidence is there, he’s our option for the next 2. If he’s struggling at Christmas, it’s time to spend on an 06’ goalie. Seems very few these days don’t have an OA year.
Excited for the draft, my choice? Eichler over Zhugin, but with Russians available… I could see them both gone. I think Eichler holds higher trade value
I doubt we hold Zhugin for a same but opposite. Zhugin would make a fine OA with what we have, but to eat up an import spot? Eichlers still on the C.S. List for the draft is he not? Curious to see if he has his name called.
D is needed, sure, some in the draft, but I agree there is urgency to build around the 06’s. Greentree will not be an overager here. We all want a gritty D I’m sure, but that’s what I’m paying for as an 05’.
It’s a lot easier to draft 2-3 forwards and have them impact the team immediately than a D man. Bring in something that’s proven in this league.
If Joeys confidence is there, he’s our option for the next 2. If he’s struggling at Christmas, it’s time to spend on an 06’ goalie. Seems very few these days don’t have an OA year.
Excited for the draft, my choice? Eichler over Zhugin, but with Russians available… I could see them both gone. I think Eichler holds higher trade value
The 2nd pick in the Import draft is 63. I don't see that as being a better player than Eichler.
HockeyPops
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2018
- 7,831
- 6,917
If Bowler can get something for Eichler I wouldn't be surprised to see him moved. When is the Spits next window? If it's not next season, it might make sense now to invest in younger imports with potential that will be here during your next window. If it is next season, I'd agree it makes sense to keep Eichler.
My feeling is the Spits will be middle of the pack next year and there big season is in 2 years. Keep Eichler, then draft a player with a pick somewhere in the 30s the next year.
Thanks, nice to see we finally have something for future situations to go off of. Might have changed how situations are handled had it been the first pick of the 2nd round like some suggested (holding onto the rights of late-1st flyers past the start of the season vs. early 1st picks).
OHLTG
Registered User
The Spitfires officially have the third overall pick in the 2024 CHL Import Draft. It's Wed., July 3 or something at 11am.
4 Bobby ORR
Registered User
Scouts thinking hulking Belchetz might be the Spitfires' choice for top pick in OHL Draft
The Windsor Spitfires might still be debating the team’s choice as the first overall pick in Thursday’s Ontario Hockey League Draft.
windsorstar.com
HockeyPops
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2018
- 7,831
- 6,917
That's 63 if no team passes on their 1st pick. Some teams may be content with the imports they have. I'd take a good look. Remember it is more of a meeting between their agents and willing to report. With Russians an Belarusians available the door of opportunity swings open for anyone who couldn't be drafted the past 3 years.
How many young Russians may want to get out of being put in the army vs hockey? The line may be long. Of course does Putin allow them to come over? That's a political issue.
I find it interesting that Russian players will now be included. I see no change in the Russia Ukraine conflict that was the reason for the ban.
GermanSpitfire
EU Video Scout for McKeen’s | Rest Easy #13
Anyone know if this was printed today?Scouts thinking hulking Belchetz might be the Spitfires' choice for top pick in OHL Draft
The Windsor Spitfires might still be debating the team’s choice as the first overall pick in Thursday’s Ontario Hockey League Draft.
It was posted on their app 6 hours ago so likely in print physically tomorrow's paper.
- Status
