No you're not, you're trying to bait me in the most obvious way and simply throwing around a cap hit thinking it has shock value to get your point across.
But hey, let me make it simple for you:
1) Mitch Marner has the 7th highest cap hit in the league, and 2nd highest amongst wingers (only Panarin makes more). He was given this contract without winning any major awards, or even a top 10 finish in points, and as an RFA, while most of his peers received bridge deals. When you rank that high and are paid big money like that up front, the expectations are also high, and since Marner does not play centre or defense, he's being paid primarily to put up points and produce offense above all else. 100+ pts should absolutely be the expectation, that's what it took to crack the top 7 in scoring last year.
A great deal would be a player outperforming their contract, which Marner is not, he is doing what is expected to even make the deal fair, forget about 'great' or even 'good.
2) William Nylander ranks 62nd in cap hits. William Nylander currently ranks 27th in league scoring, and is 12th in goals. Under Keefe, he is scoring at a 45 goal, 85 pt pace, and if Tavares wasn't struggling he would likely have more assists to go with his elite level goal scoring in that time. He has also played well defensively, and has great underlying numbers, as well as leads the league in net front goals this season. Nylander has more goals than guys like Kucherov, Pacioretty, Marchand, your boy Stamkos, amongst others.
One guy is performing in a manner expected of him, while the other is outperforming numerous players who are being paid more. Pretty straightforward stuff.
What am I trying to "bait" you into doing? You are very confusing.
I literally used your exact words so I'm not sure why you're throwing a fit.
You brought up "money", (how much they make). What do you mean I'm "throwing around a cap hit thinking it has shock value to get your point across"? I added how much they make because that seems relevant when discussing who is worth their contract. But maybe that's just me.
You're comparing nylander's cap hit against multiple defensemen and goalies, then looking at where he sits for points and claiming the high ground? My goodness.
Nylander has the 44th highest cap hit among forwards. He is tied for 25th in scoring but is tied for 39th in ppg, both among forwards. So 5 spots higher than his cap hit.
Marner has the 5th highest cap hit among forwards. He is 20th in points and 11th in ppg, both among forwards.
That doesnt take into account playing on the penalty kill or the fact that the first year of nylander's contract was a complete waste while marner is immediately producing.
Here is your original post.
"Nylander is a stud, it was just a matter of time before he finally broke out, well worth the money."
Here you clearly state nylander (73 point pace) is a "steal" for 7 mil.
"As for Marner, while he received too much at the time, under Keefe he's been scoring at close to a 120 pt pace, which would justify the money at least if he kept it up. Still not a great deal but certainly looking better now."
This is the good part. Here you say marner has to keep up a 120 point pace to justify the money and that it's still not a great deal.
Nylander's play this year is fair to even good value for his contract. I have been hard on nylander in the past but he has been much better this year. You don't win comeback player of the year (mid way) for nothing.
But to say his is a steal while marner's is not great value, even if hes scoring 120 points, is a very bad take.