Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
Why did you quote me.I think he's living rent free in a lot of heads based on this thread. I love it!
Why did you quote me.I think he's living rent free in a lot of heads based on this thread. I love it!
I said I am not saying they were right, but I felt like that is what was going on there. They didn't like the totality of the event last year involving Kadri.
He is a teammate you will defend like that though if you think something has gone wrong. It is all the perception you are taking into it.
I agree though Thornton has spent far too much of his career as that rough player. For instance what if Kadri did the same thing to say Iginla late in his career. You would expect Iginla to respond the first time like Thornton but maybe the team thinks they want to pound the message in. They didn't do a very good job of it. But I think it is worth noting that this has more of a hey don't touch my star like that. Because Kadri is a 1st rounder that plays top 6 minutes and a good player he might rightfully in his mind believe he can do that. It would appear the Sharks disagreed, we shall see, seemed like a lot of wasted energy, just saying I could see a rational beyond just the beard pull is all.
Yeah considering they were sitting on this for a whole year, it was a pretty poor effort to step up from the Sharks. Some bloke no ones ever heard of and Melker Karlsson.
Last time the Leafs were this scared was the whole Erik Gudbranson threatening to kill people event.
They were too concerned where/if Kadri was on the ice during the 2nd and 3rd periods too. That's why the Leafs had so many breakaways and odd man rushes. Kadri won that game for the stinking Leafs.They were losing after the 1st period. Sharks lost because their new system is dumb and they give up too many breakaways and odd man rushes.
Agreed.
Off topic, but your post reminds me of when Brad Ference kept taking abuse from Mario Lemieux because he couldn’t fight back against a legend. There was something very endearing about the way Ference respected Lemieux, like he knew his place. I wish the game had more of those untouchables like Lemieux and Yzerman today.
It has more to due with the slash and fight on a player the Sharks rightly view as a HHOF that in his 40's shouldn't have to put up with that stuff from Kadri. It's not just the beard pull from last year, though after you did something to draw the ire of a 40 year old HHOF the beard pull doesn't help the telling of that story. The Sharks didn't appreciate Kadri going after Thornton on an opening face off when everyone in the league knew he was kind of beat up last year.
I am not saying they are right. Thornton has a history of fighting right at the hop of the game and wanted that piece of Kadri after the slash but I guess the full event didn't sit well with the Sharks. But the just the beard pull seems to go away from the event where the extremely high and hard chop on the wrist angered the Sharks.
But saying Kadri didn't start that fight last year, he slashed him in a way where guys get wrist bones broken ala the Giroux and Crosby feud. They don't like you intentionally chopping where areas aren't padded and especially not to star players that are well respected. I don't think it is just the beard pull is all, but only the Sharks truly know and they don't seem to be elaborating.
As to the broadcast seemingly in on it. Well they knew the Sharks were going to try to do something, they heard it throughout the day. They are embedded with the team, these guys don't wander into events like this without having heard the chatter from the room and knowing it is likely to unfold on the ice that night.
Why would he have to fight because he fought last season? lol
Thornton wanted to go and has a huge size advantage, and somehow he's a victim in this haha. I would get it it if Kadri hunted down Karlsson and jumped him...
If Thornton was so upset, he should have dropped them himself.
he won't admit it thoughWatch the footage, Thornton slashed him, Kadri slashed back. You are creating a false narrative.
It has more to due with the slash and fight on a player the Sharks rightly view as a HHOF that in his 40's shouldn't have to put up with that stuff from Kadri. It's not just the beard pull from last year, though after you did something to draw the ire of a 40 year old HHOF the beard pull doesn't help the telling of that story. The Sharks didn't appreciate Kadri going after Thornton on an opening face off when everyone in the league knew he was kind of beat up last year.
I am not saying they are right. Thornton has a history of fighting right at the hop of the game and wanted that piece of Kadri after the slash but I guess the full event didn't sit well with the Sharks. But the just the beard pull seems to go away from the event where the extremely high and hard chop on the wrist angered the Sharks.
But saying Kadri didn't start that fight last year, he slashed him in a way where guys get wrist bones broken ala the Giroux and Crosby feud. They don't like you intentionally chopping where areas aren't padded and especially not to star players that are well respected. I don't think it is just the beard pull is all, but only the Sharks truly know and they don't seem to be elaborating.
As to the broadcast seemingly in on it. Well they knew the Sharks were going to try to do something, they heard it throughout the day. They are embedded with the team, these guys don't wander into events like this without having heard the chatter from the room and knowing it is likely to unfold on the ice that night.
The first goal was a direct result of SJ stupidly trying to make a point instead of playing the game.
You are trying too hard.
Watch the footage, Thornton slashed him, Kadri slashed back. You are creating a false narrative.
They were losing after the 1st period. Sharks lost because their new system is dumb and they give up too many breakaways and odd man rushes.
What a joke of a post. Thornton slashed him first and asked for the fight. Get a clue. Don't want none, dont start none.
It's like people can't comprehend this...
One of the more famous stories on the great 01-02 team in Detroit is Brett Hull pulling Sean Avery back down on the bench and telling him not to talk to Mr. Sakic like that. There was an interesting part of that, but those guys grew up in an era where the game was a lot more brutal and they were not to be touched. The price for doing it was on display more often and the retaliation on your star was very real. I think it is something that is tough to replicate today with the way the game and players have changed. Keep in mind when looking at those players you're discussing helped take the league though (I understand all of professional sports exploded) as a built the league and my fortune feel there in my opinion.
People are not going to be allowed to take liberties with old Crosby. Marleau is a guy that isn't to be touched around the league. Zetterberg the last few years you could tell guys were not to disrespect him. They exist still, it just has different feel in the game. It isn't changing back in my opinion so we just have to embrace the subtle differences.
“You do not get to talk to Mr. Sakic,” Hull said.
The idea that Thornton went after Kadri for no reason is supremely laughable last year but it doesn't matter. The coach told a 4th liner to go after someone. It was stupid on DeBoer's part but it wasn't why they lost the game.
You simply have to love hyperbole...Good on Naz to keep his cool last night.
Right from the opening face off he was living the life of Rielly in their collective heads.
Literally turned the game around just by being in the line up.
So Thornton didn't like the outcome of a fight that he instigated between someone 6'4" 220lbs and 6' 192. What a goof. Not surprising the organization follows suit.
Thornton didn't instigate that fight and Thornton likely didn't care about yesterday's altercation either.