- Jan 29, 2003
- 26,433
- 23,175
Say the Bruins had 16 million to spend on 3 forwards. Which is better?
Option A => 1 A-level forward and 1 B-level forward splitting up 14 million + Danton Heinen at 2 million.
OR
Option B => 3 B-level forwards splitting up the 16 million.
If it's me, I take Option A all day long. You get that forward they really need that slots between Pasta and Marchand as the teams #2 forward. And they get more flexibility moving forward with Heinen's lower term and lower AAV.
Signing 3 B-level forwards all age 27 or older in the same summer for significant AAV and term sounds like a recipe for disaster. Middle six forwards with term are some of the hardest contracts to move in hockey if things go south or cap space is needed.
I’ve done so many mock lineups my head spins sometimes. I work better with specific names and salaries so I’ll answer it with the mock lineup above.
This is with Ullmark moved for picks.
And…I know it won’t happen, some guys might get more $$ or years, but this is the type of lineup I’d want and why/how, I don’t see Heinen fitting if they are serious about improving.