Atas2000
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2011
- 13,601
- 3,269
Hitchcock and Yeo are about the exact opposite kind of coach Yakupov needed to play under to have any hopes of resurrecting his NHL career.
That's exactly what I was saying.
Hitchcock and Yeo are about the exact opposite kind of coach Yakupov needed to play under to have any hopes of resurrecting his NHL career.
Hockey IQ needed for the NA hockey is lower.
Are you implying that Yakupov has enough hockey IQ for the NHL?
I imply that the NA game is less hockey IQ oriented. why are you trying to find something that isn't there?
I heard he's addicted to ps4
Alexandre Daigle played in the NHL for 13 years.
I imply that the NA game is less hockey IQ oriented. why are you trying to find something that isn't there?
Well people tend to say that Yakupov has low hockey IQ. You suggest the NHL requires low (or lesser) hockey IQ. See the connection?
Peiople are wrong. Hockey IQ is not Yak's problem.
I was replying to a post claiming that he might be better off in Russia ith his lack of hockey IQ. What I am pointing at is that a player with less hockey IQ has more of a chance to succeed in NA (in a role obiously). If hockey IQ indeed was Yaupov major problem he would have a hard time adjusting in Russia.
People are wrong? Maybe you're wrong?
He never showed a potential to be 30/30 scorer in the NHL. His numbers were inflated in his 1st season in a sheltered role. He was just as bad back then. Most of his goals were easy tap-ins, that doesn't scream 30 goalscorer to meWhile his hockey IQ is definitely holding him back and is a reason he would never become a good #1 regardless of his coaching/development, I think it's more than just his hockey IQ that caused him to bust.
He scored at a 29g, 53pt pace in his first season. I think that shows that he had enough talent to be a good scoring winger (like a 30/30ish offensive player -> JVR-like production). Development and coaching in his early years was not good and his hockey IQ didn't allow him to change how he played in order to succeed like some others have (RNH changing his game to be more of a shut-down/2-way role for example).
He never showed a potential to be 30/30 scorer in the NHL. His numbers were inflated in his 1st season in a sheltered role. He was just as bad back then. Most of his goals were easy tap-ins, that doesn't scream 30 goalscorer to me
You don't think scoring a 29g pace in your first season doesn't show potential to be a 30g scorer? He probably would have been part of a semi-sheltered scoring line in his prime anyways (getting secondary match-ups, not as sheltered as rookie season, but still not seeing the top lines). Not saying it was guaranteed, but he put up some good offensive #'s in his rookie year and had a pretty good shot to pot 30 with some better coaching/development IMO.
All hypothetical because a better coach doesn't mean he'll get better results out of everybody, but I think he could've been a good offensive player if utilized/developed correctly.
He also shot 21%, completely unsustainable. He started with 5 goals in 7 games and ended with 11 in 14 (6 in final 3 games). 16 of his 17 goals were in the span of 21 games. I wouldn't use that as an example of what he could do going forward.
He's never been able to sustain streaks like that or a shooting% that comes anywhere close to 21%.
His positioning in the offensive and defensive zones is terrible. Multiple times this season you could see the frustration on the Blues players' faces when he is either not where he's supposed to be or when he simply gets in their way, it's happened with Schwartz multiple times. He has the hustle, but the problem comes down to he has to work smarter, not harder.