Doubt Colorado would go for it. O'Reilly is a rare breed of player. He has the potential to be one of the best all around players in the game while putting up very good numbers (60-70 points). He's also very physical and a great leader. All at age, what, 23? Colorado would move Stastny before O'Reilly. He's a part of their core.
I think the whole Colorado moving O"Reilly thing died when he signed his contract. Unless they can get a very, very good defenseman back, and while I like DZ, he isn't that.
Not dead set on it having to be ROR. I'm just musing that that will be the type of player we target by dangling MDZ and potentially Brassard.
Need a 1/2 c after we buy out Richards. No matter how good he's playing right now it's inevitable that we need to buy him out. The risk of him retiring before the end of the contract is too great and this is our last chance to buy him out.
Risks that also need to be addressed are Girardi falling off the face of the planet/asking for much more than he should be and Staal potentially bolting in a year and a half's time from now.
That's why I list Orpik and ROR (as an ex of a 1/2c) as solutions.
Now you can say why not trade Girardi or Staal then and keep on to Brassard to be our 2c when Richie leaves?
Girardi - may ask for 4+ mill over the next 4 years. You can't afford to give him that with the signs of aging and slowing down that he's shown over the last 2 years.
Staal - there is still a possibility that you can resign him. I don't think he's closed the door on us. If he does then you won't get top return for him unless it's to the Cane's.
Brassard - Shows to be inconsistent like he was in Col. He became their 3c before long because of his inconsistency. Perhaps the type of system he thrived in most was something like Torts. High intensity coaching that spells out how a player should play. Can't have that as your everyday 2c.