bernmeister
Registered User
His deal is bad and and he isn't really what the Leafs need, but is it bad enough to trade for Karlsson or the Predators forwards or something? Seems like they'd prefer just keeping Tavares. Trouba getting traded to a Canadian team would be hilarious.
Rangers would say no on Trouba. He’s too important to the team and tonight he showed it. Has lowkey been better than Fox to start the season, saved an OT goal tonight and has been stellar defensively while Fox has looked a bit shaky aside from period 2 in the Dallas game. Not to mention how lost NYR looked without Trouba at the end of last season
Rather keep him for now, plus he has an NMC
Marner is the one I’m open to moving
Best ask Pyjama-boy because he's the one in complete control of the situation.
The only thing the Leafs control is a buyout. A buyout that happens to save the Leafs a grand total of only 910K on a 24M remaining salary. Also even in a buyout they save virtually no cap hit. Only save 600K a year for the next three years and they'd have an extra 300K in cap hit for the three years after that (2025-20028.)
They can't even send him to the minors. LOL
The Leafs are not giving away a PPG #1C for free. He is retiring in Toronto and probably comes back on a Spezza deal when his current contract is over.
He won't be worth 11m in the last few years of his deal, but he is still a 1st line C with a strong two-way game, elite on draws with intangibles. In three years, he's played one full/regular series, the others being a qualifier/concussion. I'd sooner move Marner.
Oh please. Your management would eat that trade up in a second. Trouba isn't even a top pair D and he's on a bloated contract. These players aren't in the same stratosphere.
It doesn't matter what the Leafs would prefer. It doesn't matter what bad contracts other teams might be inclined to swap for him. It matters that Tavares wants to be a Leaf, has an ironclad NMC, and the structure of his contract makes it essentially buyout proof (since it's mostly signing bonuses.)
Correct. Trouba is fine. He’s handling all the toughest defensive matchups and also very important for Miller’s development. If he were to go, it would be to shed, not add salary.
His salary is a bit high and that’s exacerbated by the flat cap. But much more manageable than Tavares’ cap hit.
no time to read 5 pgs
He is leafs, for better or worse, 3 seasons after this.
Full nmc, zero ability to juggle.
Only point not raised is if Leafs can lobby w/other owners for return of complaince buy outs. Team pays (most of?) balance of salary, no hit on cap. Howev, owners not likely to bite.
Trouba...
has improved
is available for a trade theoretically b'c must move his cap to get ahead of the curve, but
in actuality is not available now due to his controlling NMC for 'nother coupla yrs
He would likely not waive to go to Canada. Might go south, not north.
Just to exhaust the idea, a declining older Tavares at 11 for an in his prime Trouba at 8 makes less than zero sense for the Rangers.
Even if players agreed to swap and TML did max 50% retention, so NY w/11 reduced to 5.5, then 8 - 5.5. would save NY 2.5 in cap, that is not enough.
Agree fully w/ @Lays JT for JT is a no for NY.
Disagree he is not peddled first chance of an acceptable return b'c need to make cap + also room for Schneider