LordNeverLose
Registered User
In this case a team can draft him and take away his ability to select his own team right?
I believe (could be wrong) he's too old to be drafted.
In this case a team can draft him and take away his ability to select his own team right?
I believe (could be wrong) he's too old to be drafted.
This guy was on my radar four months ago. Lol, teams should have signed him then. These days, the price may have increased....
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=2160037&highlight=darren+raddysh&page=2
In this case a team can draft him and take away his ability to select his own team right?
Do people think his skill will translate to pro?
Tampa wouldn't be the one to pass on him.There is absolutely no reason for TB to not sign this guy, I don't care how many rookies they have coming into Syracuse next year. You don't pass on the numbers this guy has put up because of a logjam. You make room. If he doesn't pan out, let him go.
Come home Darren, we need you.
I love this logic.hes not an NHLer
Do people think his skill will translate to pro?
I love this logic.
Panarin wasn't an NHLer either until a team signed him.
I brought up Panarin because he was a free agent before too. Am I saying that Raddysh is Panarin 2.0? No.I stated an opinion. Not sure why you brought up panarin. I don't see him projecting as a regular NHL Defenseman.
I could be wrong.
We don't need D??
We do, but we need a veteran D to pull the top 4 together , we need a Shattenkirk, Alzner, Fowler or Vatenan, we don't really NEED A guy who in all likelihood isn't playing for us this season
hes not an NHLer