WJCJ
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 1,649
- 687
It sure sounds like it could make Bruins fans a lot more interested in draft dayThey don’t have a 1st, 2nd or 3rd but have scheduled a draft party. Which could be a very weird party.
It sure sounds like it could make Bruins fans a lot more interested in draft dayThey don’t have a 1st, 2nd or 3rd but have scheduled a draft party. Which could be a very weird party.
Darcy Kuemper was the third one.Hes 31 yrs old....that looks bad 3 yrs from now.
In today's podcast EF said only 3 30× g returned a 1st going back 15 yrs or so
Msrstrom
Ryan Miller
One other goalie I'm forgetting
All were 1<= 2 yr left rentals
I think Chychrun straight up be equal.Ullmark for 25th OA and Chychrun?
I don’t think so, Chychrun had a rough year, is injury prone, and will be looking for a payday. Chychrun plus pick 25 is probably equal value but I would prefer a single, better asset instead of two nickels for a dime.I think Chychrun straight up be equal.
One or the other as the main piece, not both.Ullmark for 25th OA and Chychrun?
I don’t think so, Chychrun had a rough year, is injury prone, and will be looking for a payday. Chychrun plus pick 25 is probably equal value but I would prefer a single, better asset instead of two nickels for a dime.
I don’t think so, Chychrun had a rough year, is injury prone, and will be looking for a payday. Chychrun plus pick 25 is probably equal value but I would prefer a single, better asset instead of two nickels for a dime.
Everybody says that but a 4 years older and much worse Markstrom just got a late first and a third pair D.History doesn't agree with your opinion. That's substantially more than what goalies typically get traded for.
Everybody says that but a 4 years older and much worse Markstrom just got a late first and a third pair D.
Of course there isn’t anything outrageous about that deal. I am simply saying that Ullmark is much more valuable than Markstrom due to age and performance.Considering Calgary is paying a good chunk of Markstrom's salary next season, the return was fair. Nothing outrageous about that trade at all.
Of course there isn’t anything outrageous about that deal. I am simply saying that Ullmark is much more valuable than Markstrom due to age and performance.
25th and something I assume. Or ChychrunWhat do the Sens offer the Bruins?
Chychrun is a UFA with a preferred set of teams he will reup with coming off a rough year. A late 1st in a shallow draft isn’t a crazy make up in value piece in the slightest.I don't disagree, but there's also a premium on the Markstrom price due to salary retention as mentioned previously. You need to take that into account when you jump from a 1st + a young 3rd pairing D that was paid for Markstrom to your idea of a 1st + Chychrun for Ullmark.
I think Ullmark will get a slightly better return overall vs Markstrom, but not to the degree you're talking about.
Chychrun is a UFA with a preferred set of teams he will reup with coming off a rough year. A late 1st in a shallow draft isn’t a crazy make up in value piece in the slightest.
Markstrom was seemingly also far more flexible with his trade destination (and has 2yrs left, so whether he will sign an extension isnt a factor)You're downplaying what Chychrun's value is, he's also on a hell of a contract for the next year which contenders value. He's not worth what Ottawa paid last year, but I still think he has late 1st in value being conservative (no doubt he'd get that at a minimum at the trade deadline if he's kept). So yes, two assets worth 1sts is crazy make up according to historical precedent for trading goalies.
Markstrom was seemingly also far more flexible with his trade destination (and has 2yrs left, so whether he will sign an extension isnt a factor)
You're downplaying what Chychrun's value is, he's also on a hell of a contract for the next year which contenders value. He's not worth what Ottawa paid last year, but I still think he has late 1st in value being conservative (no doubt he'd get that at a minimum at the trade deadline if he's kept). So yes, two assets worth 1sts is crazy make up according to historical precedent for trading goalies.
You're downplaying what Chychrun's value is, he's also on a hell of a contract for the next year which contenders value. He's not worth what Ottawa paid last year, but I still think he has late 1st in value being conservative (no doubt he'd get that at a minimum at the trade deadline if he's kept). So yes, two assets worth 1sts is crazy make up according to historical precedent for trading goalies.
I dunno man. Average goalies like Keumpfer, Markstrom, Jones, etc have gone for firsts in recent memory. Ullmark is elite and it’s a shallow draft. Bruins are likely going to have to take Forsberg back too.
Chychrun is 26 and will be a consistent 50 pt+ LDI don’t think so, Chychrun had a rough year, is injury prone, and will be looking for a payday. Chychrun plus pick 25 is probably equal value but I would prefer a single, better asset instead of two nickels for a dime.
If Chychrun become a Bs he s becoming the 2nd best D in this team no to say the best one, not far from the 73, better than Stallion on the PP can drive the PP, a elite slapshotChychrun is 26 and will be a consistent 50 pt+ LD
Played all 82 last year. Got screwed around playing on his off side changing partners etc. still had 41 pts
Add a 4th if needed