Toggle sidebar

When will Tony DeAngelo situation get resolved?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

When will Tony DeAngelo situation get resolved?

  • Total voters
    165
Status
Not open for further replies.
tailgunner said:
for sh*ts and giggles let's play this little game

Rangers finished the season with 60 points and 11 points out of a playoff spot

Let's say Georgiev never gives up the OT goal and there is no altercation with TDA
Where would the Rangers wind up in the standings with TDA in the line-up during a full season ?

Also look how passive and creampuff the team played all year and esp down the stretch
Don't you think with TDA's snarl and aggressiveness that we would of had a better season ?

Gorton weakened the team with his handling of this altercation and it cost him his job.
Click to expand...

ADA would still be off the team because it was just a matter of time before he was selfish and hurt his team again. He had one straw left. That was widely reported.

Gorton improved the team. Addition by subtraction. I got news for you too - If Gallant were the coach and he was pulling that shit I'm sure he'd be off the team too. He was a major distraction and his head wasn't in the right place. He put himself before the team.

It has zero to do with "snarl and aggressiveness" or even what ADA did on the ice to help the team win. He was a good player, no doubt - but he ruined it for himself. He had plenty of chances. Many teammates tried to help and get him back on track. No one else is to blame.

My question to all of the ADA sympathizers is if he is so valuable to a team to the tone you are suggesting than why wasn't he claimed or traded for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2
HockeyBasedNYC said:
My question to all of the ADA sympathizers is if he is so valuable to a team to the tone you are suggesting than why wasn't he claimed or traded for?
Click to expand...

Yeah in a league that has shown time and time again that they're willing to give guys second chances or overlook tons of stuff, I doubt the way the Rangers handled things really had a big impact on DeAngelo's trade value. I think teams have always been wary of his antics, that has been the story on him since his days in junior all the way up through the NHL. Great talent but a great headache too. This episode bumps it up a notch but is still pretty much another variation on the same old story with DeAngelo since juniors.

His contract and the Rangers unwillingness to retain $$ in a trade are probably a big reason why no one was interested...but if he was truly regarded as highly as some people here find him then some team would have taken a shot.

Beyond all that I dont' think he was ever long for this team. Fox is the superior player, Trouba isn't going anywhere, and the Rangers weren't going to keep two similar-ish players like Fox and DeAngelo long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 23124, HockeyBasedNYC, haveandare and 1 other person
tailgunner said:
yes and yes
I have been screaming this since it happened and TRUE BLUE and EDGE have vilified and molested me in public over this lol

This was the main reason why Dolan fired Gorton, Gorton was totally unprofessional as to how he handled this whole fiasco.
As for JD I think he was fired only because Dolan told JD to fire Gorton and JD refused, otherwise I think JD would of stayed
Click to expand...

I don't understand how you're vilified for having this opinion. I've never seen any organization do what the Rangers did in this situation. We've seen disgruntled players in all sports that are characterized as bad locker room guys and they get traded for assets. Rangers took a defenseman that plays the Power Point with 53 points and all we can do is tangle him in front of Seattle hoping they bite!
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
Fansince1992 said:
I don't understand how you're vilified for having this opinion. I've never seen any organization do what the Rangers did in this situation. We've seen disgruntled players in all sports that are characterized as bad locker room guys and they get traded for assets. Rangers took a defenseman that plays the Power Point with 53 points and all we can do is tangle him in front of Seattle hoping they bite!
Click to expand...

Hard to trade a guy for assets when nobody will take him for free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frozenrubber and HockeyBasedNYC
I get that Tony is capable of putting up a lot of points but all his production did not make him a good defenseman. His defensive game was weak.

I don’t think the Rangers had a problem so much with Tony’s political beliefs (FWIW I’ve read that Jimmy Dolan’s father Charles was a big contributor to Trump’s presidential runs)—the problem was he wouldn’t when asked ‘tone it down’ and had become a for real locker room distraction. There may have been other issues but the fight with Georgiev climaxed everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
Fansince1992 said:
Well that's because JD and JG told the media that he would never play for the Rangers again. Why would anyone trade for him then? Just wait till they buy him out or Seattle can get him in the expansion draft
Click to expand...
If he's a such a team-changing player, why wouldn't a team trade for him? Or just get him for free on waivers?
 
Fansince1992 said:
Well that's because JD and JG told the media that he would never play for the Rangers again. Why would anyone trade for him then? Just wait till they buy him out or Seattle can get him in the expansion draft
Click to expand...

They put him on waivers. Teams could have literally claimed him, at his current salary, for free.

All 30 other teams had his name pop up on their screen, and all 30 swiped left.
 
Harbour Dog said:
They put him on waivers. Teams could have literally claimed him, at his current salary, for free.

All 30 other teams had his name pop up on their screen, and all 30 swiped left.
Click to expand...
They didn't want the entire contract. 100% for what would have been a year and three-quarters.

Much better chance for a deal at 50% for a reduced term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
He has no value. To answer the original question- the situation has already resolved itself.
 
Fansince1992 said:
Never said he's a team changing player. I'm saying the way the Rangers handled it was atrocious because they couldn't even showcase him. He's just sitting at home.
Click to expand...

Showcase what? Teams saw him play for many games before him being shut down on his own actions.

If anything, the team could have tried to sweep it under the rug and trade him asap. I guess word got out and that's that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eco's bones
I mean look, Davidson and Gorton, whether you like them or not, are clearly not clueless idiots. They obviously knew that the actions they were taking would essentially eliminate any value that DeAngelo had. Evidently they felt that his presence on the team was so toxic that it was worth essentially tanking his value. Again--you can question their decision and that's fair, but they're not morons and they made a conscious decision that they felt was necessary. I was lukewarm on both JD and Gorts but if they knowingly took that incredibly severe action, I absolutely believe that it must have been warranted. Even stupid teams don't generally take assets and turn them to piles of sand for shits and giggles.

There's also the fact that the NHL is a small, insular community and word gets around very quickly. There aren't a lot of secrets that stay confined to one locker room. If DeAngelo was that much of a problem for the Rangers, I promise you that the rest of the league knew it. It didn't take him being dismissed from the team for the rest of the league to suddenly learn there was a real problem with the guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yada, Mac n Gs, HockeyBasedNYC and 2 others
It wouldn’t surprise me if Tony found another team post buyout. What would surprise me if he got much of a contract. He’s back to scratch of proving himself……and this next time quite likely will be his last chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
nyr2k2 said:
I mean look, Davidson and Gorton, whether you like them or not, are clearly not clueless idiots. They obviously knew that the actions they were taking would essentially eliminate any value that DeAngelo had. Evidently they felt that his presence on the team was so toxic that it was worth essentially tanking his value. Again--you can question their decision and that's fair, but they're not morons and they made a conscious decision that they felt was necessary. I was lukewarm on both JD and Gorts but if they knowingly took that incredibly severe action, I absolutely believe that it must have been warranted. Even stupid teams don't generally take assets and turn them to piles of sand for shits and giggles.

There's also the fact that the NHL is a small, insular community and word gets around very quickly. There aren't a lot of secrets that stay confined to one locker room. If DeAngelo was that much of a problem for the Rangers, I promise you that the rest of the league knew it. It didn't take him being dismissed from the team for the rest of the league to suddenly learn there was a real problem with the guy.
Click to expand...

I agree with all that, yet the Rangers traded for him, and extended him, so I think they have to share some of the blame.

Even if ADA evolved or elevated whatever after they extended him they were still fooled, and the result is still the result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eco's bones and nyr2k2
Off Sides said:
I agree with all that, yet the Rangers traded for him, and extended him, so I think they have to share some of the blame.

Even if ADA evolved or elevated whatever after they extended him they were still fooled, and the result is still the result.
Click to expand...
Right. They took the gamble on giving him two years and it backfired.

Personally, I think it was a worthwhile gamble; if it worked out and DeAngelo settled down, you had a great offensive defenseman on your hands. If it didn't work out, and you had to buy him out (which was worst-case), the cost would be minimal. So for me, I don't even really fault them for keeping him, since I think the risk was reasonable and worth taking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Off Sides
nyr2k2 said:
Right. They took the gamble on giving him two years and it backfired.

Personally, I think it was a worthwhile gamble; if it worked out and DeAngelo settled down, you had a great offensive defenseman on your hands. If it didn't work out, and you had to buy him out (which was worst-case), the cost would be minimal. So for me, I don't even really fault them for keeping him, since I think the risk was reasonable and worth taking.
Click to expand...

Sure, yet I am still wondering about that two year instead of just one.

Like either way on a 1 year

He is good, they are paying up just as they kind of did even at 4.8M.

He flakes out, but they only had one year.

I am fine with the gamble to trade for him, fine with them trying him out on the team, I am not so sure I get the two year deal if there were still question marks.

Not that it's the biggest deal, just like 400K in year one of buyout, 800K cap hit in year two.

My bigger concern would be why the last regime never seemed to play the possible outcome game, or they did yet always favored the most positive possible outcome. Should have signed ADA for a year even if it takes arbitration to do so, it's not like he was going to give them a break on contracts no matter what in the future. It was negotiation hardball time and the Rangers seemed to sort of wuss out.
 
mjolnir said:
I seem to recall a similar sentiment about Avery.
Click to expand...
Because at a certain point it was true.

Avery was amazing his first stint. By the end of second stint, it was clear he was just finished as a player and we had much ado about "Torts just hates him for no reason and he's ruining this great player we could have!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: East Coast Bias
If ADA isn’t traded or taken by Seattle, and bought out, he will have multiple offers and end up making around 2M, mark my words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobbop
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom