norrisnick
The best...
- Apr 14, 2005
- 31,271
- 16,640
I'm fine with criticism. It just needs to make sense.You really think a 5 year deal to a 40 point center is good value?
I'm a Habs fan, I know Chiarot's strengths and weaknesses. If you're acquiring him for off the ice reasons, there were and are cheaper ways to do it.
And my point was, there are easier ways to get veteran leaders than give them big money UFA deals.
You also end up with 10+ years by never getting that elite talent. Popular teams brought out as cautionary tales against tanking weren't actually tanking a lot of those years, they were bringing in vets to fit the culture.
And if you think the old Detroit model or what the Ducks did is at all translatable to building a winner now, then go ahead. Personally, teams than benefitted from accruing talent pre-cap or taking advantage of the institution of a cap don't seem like models that work nowadays.
Criticism isn't a bad thing. Its ok to like the leadership of the team but criticize decisions or parts of the plan.
A 5 year deal for a guy that is a reliable middle six center/winger that can play both special teams is fine. It doesn't hurt. Chiarot is worse than advertised on the ice, but he's there to be a physical leader on the blue line and a vocal leader in the room. He can be buried once we get better.
That and the Wings did have to 1. Field a roster and 2. Be cap compliant. By being a bit heavy they had the bubble to be able to sell off a bit at the deadline. And since it hasn't happened I get the sense that Ilitch isn't keen on spending on dead contracts. He'd prefer a semi competitive roster as he has a brand new building to fill.