What do you mean? Im talking about picking higher, Im talking about picking more.I'm just not sure how drafting Zadina over Hughes relates to Yzerman I guess
Every year so far.Do you really think Detroit without Chiarot is worse than Chicago this year?
And I thought you were talking about 2021 and 2022? How did Copp affect our draft position those years? Should we have traded Seider and Raymond too, given they were massive parts of lifting us out of the bottom 4?
Bertuzzi, Mantha and Hronek have all been traded. What are you even talking about. Bertuzzi's 9 games in 2020-21 were not what prevented the Wings from tanking.At the end of the day, he kept Larkin, Bertuzzi, Mantha and Hronek for what? To be non-competitive for five years ?
He just traded two of them.Bertuzzi, Mantha and Hronek have all been traded. What are you even talking about. Bertuzzi's 9 games in 2020-21 were not what prevented the Wings from tanking.
You literally just mentionned Mercer?
Also, yes they do in their system.
I think you misunderstand. Winning the lottery isn't the plan, but if you DON'T - things tend to take more time.
Like, Raymond is 2nd in scoring from his draft class and the only U21 players outscoring him this season are top 3 picks. Yet he's questioned, debated and seen by some as a disappointment.
It's all just a lack of patience.
I'll become impatient when things go off the rails. Part of being patient is waiting for things to get better and 4 years in, things have gotten drastically better. Yzerman started out with a seriously negative value club. He cleared bullshit contracts, offloaded a few assets that aren't part of the long term strat and has drafted well in the first round with what picks he was able to acquire. We're now starting to see his second and later round picks starting to develop but that's where the patience part comes in, it's not an overnight process and lotto luck has screwed Detroit almost as much as Holland's leftover mess that had to be cleaned up did. But despite both of those situations, we're showing improvements and continue the slow and steady route.Do you want to perhaps re-read what I wrote?
You can still be patient and, after almost 4 years, think its reasonable to criticize a GM. Excluding a lame duck in Poile, Yzerman is already the 14th longest tenured GM in the NHL. The question is "[w]hen does the Yzerplan start getting criticized?" And if the answer isn't at the very least now, then you're probably not being too much of a homer.
That is not the goal.He just traded two of them.
What about last year? Did Bertuzzi not help you win games? Larkin?
The goal is to start a rebuild close to zero, not with a wish-washi half assed still a few players good enough type of roster.
I'll become impatient when things go off the rails. Part of being patient is waiting for things to get better and 4 years in, things have gotten drastically better. Yzerman started out with a seriously negative value club. He cleared bullshit contracts, offloaded a few assets that aren't part of the long term strat and has drafted well in the first round with what picks he was able to acquire. We're now starting to see his second and later round picks starting to develop but that's where the patience part comes in, it's not an overnight process and lotto luck has screwed Detroit almost as much as Holland's leftover mess that had to be cleaned up did. But despite both of those situations, we're showing improvements and continue the slow and steady route.
Kucherov, Pastrnak, Tkachuk, Robertson, and Karlsson were all drafted outside the top-5. That's half of the top-10 scorers.Currently the top 10 leading scorers in the league?
I count 3 who were not drafted top 5.
Kuch, Pasta, Point
Burns was a 1st round pickAbout 50% of Norris guys are drafted in the top-5 (Doughty, Hedman, Makar, Dahlin) but about half the time then there's Josi, Fox, Burns who are drafted outside of the 1st round).
My only complaint to date is the Chiarot signing. Outside of that (and honestly, I think Chiarot has probably cost us more games than he's helped us so kind of a wash of better standings vs better draft picks).Again, you can still be patient and criticize the plan. Like, its really not a crime to appreciate the process and growth and still wonder about some of the draft picks or what the point of giving money and term to older players that drove the team away from a higher draft spot/lottery odds, but not near the playoffs.
My only complaint to date is the Chiarot signing. Outside of that (and honestly, I think Chiarot has probably cost us more games than he's helped us so kind of a wash of better standings vs better draft picks).
It is, after you establish the goal that you want a succesful team.That is not the goal.
How many first round picks did the Oilers get again?All the Wings fans shitting on Ken Holland when he was pushed out of Detroit, look what he has done for Edmonton in just a few short years. look at what the Lightning have done without Yzerman
You hope for more, the reality is, trades take two parties and if no one is buying, you aren't gonna sell. Trading Larkin would have soured a LOT of fans as he's the hometown kid combined with being the Captain of the team. Bert, Hronek, and so on we got decent returns for.Then you're a far more generous fan than I, because I see a lot more.
You should probably look at the roster Holland took over in Edmonton then look at the dumpster fire he left behind for Yzerman in Detroit.All the Wings fans shitting on Ken Holland when he was pushed out of Detroit, look what he has done for Edmonton in just a few short years. look at what the Lightning have done without Yzerman
You hope for more, the reality is, trades take two parties and if no one is buying, you aren't gonna sell. Trading Larkin would have soured a LOT of fans as he's the hometown kid combined with being the Captain of the team. Bert, Hronek, and so on we got decent returns for.
Outside of the whining about "not tanking enough" what else is there? Tank too much and you build a losing culture, Relying on winning the lottery? Not even close to reliable and should be considered, "cool we won" and not a "we have to win" approach. We had fairly high chances were constantly getting worse picks, it's just what it is, you don't keep trying to toss the dice in hopes of winning, you start building and getting better and developing. The mindset that you keep tossing the dice is a poor mans dream of riches or a gambling addict.
Yes, a culture of losing. Players don't tank, they go out there and bust their ass (in most cases) So setting a team up for failure is going to cause problems making it harder to resign your developing talent and drive off any would be free agents.I mean, I'm not a Wings fan, I'm a fan of a rival. I'm pretty ok with Yzerman because the Atlantic is tough enough as it is and I'd be critical of the "Yzerplan" if I were a fan because other teams are doing it better.
And you can tank harder while still building a culture. You can still build a culture and rebuild without signing a bunch of older UFAs.
Yes, a culture of losing. Players don't tank, they go out there and bust their ass (in most cases) So setting a team up for failure is going to cause problems making it harder to resign your developing talent and drive off any would be free agents.
It's not like a team gets 4 or 5 players injected from the draft in a year. Those kids coming up need to be sheltered and educated, not put into a sink or swim environment. The Oilers and Sabres are prime examples of how sink or swim extends your rebuild by a very long time and wastes draft picks.
The problem is the only suggestions really made in terms of what Yzerman could have done differently seem to boil down to two things;You can still be patient and, after almost 4 years, think its reasonable to criticize a GM. Excluding a lame duck in Poile, Yzerman is already the 14th longest tenured GM in the NHL. The question is "[w]hen does the Yzerplan start getting criticized?" And if the answer isn't at the very least now, then you're probably not being too much of a homer.
How confident are you that Detroit's a bottom 3 team without Larkin and Bertuzzi though? And that they actually retain a top 3 pick in the lottery and don't fall to 4th or 5th?He just traded two of them.
What about last year? Did Bertuzzi not help you win games? Larkin?
The goal is to start a rebuild close to zero, not with a wish-washi half assed still a few players good enough type of roster.
The problem is the only suggestions really made in terms of what Yzerman could have done differently seem to boil down to two things;
1. Tank harder and longer
2. Just get lucky in the lottery
Even if you do your best at #1, #2 is impossible to control.
How confident are you that Detroit's a bottom 3 team without Larkin and Bertuzzi though? And that they actually retain a top 3 pick in the lottery and don't fall to 4th or 5th?