KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
- Apr 6, 2006
- 32,583
- 11,777
I guess I've been unreasonable in our several months of discussion and haven't backed up my ideas at all.
No, the concern Kopitar has is he's a rental UFA asking for Toews money but may be declining. Regardless of Kovalchuk's position and 'concerns,' let's not pretend his value in a trade would be vastly less than Kopitar's somehow. There's no 'basis' because it's not often guys like this are on the block (with good reason), I'm just trying to draw comparables because it seems like people think we're going to just sling Kopitar for a king's ransom and remain competitive.
They wouldn't, they'd be in the same boat we are in right now, ironically...but if they're 'all in' now as is reported...
I already said that. Any team trading for Kopitar isn't looking at him as a pure rental, they're looking to sign him. Doesn't necessarily increase his trade value.
Montreal wouldn't give Galchenyuk because then they run the risk of losing Galchenyuk forever AND Kopitar after the season and it's a major setback. Suddenly, Plekanec is your #1 center and you have nothing behind him of substance. Jeez, look how many people were broken up over losing Roland ****ing McKeown around here!
It's just a lot riskier than you've made it sound.
Brad, this wouldn't happen, and I think you know that. No deal happens without some backroom discussion regarding a signing. Any team acquiring Kopitar knows his price. Please stop with the garbage about it being a huge risk that they would lose Kopitar. The acquiring team would be getting Kopitar for 8.5 seasons, unfortunately for them after about 3 seasons.