hfman
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 3,235
- 1,601
All Leafs players are on the table including Matthews and Marner.
Let's go.....
...
Last edited:
All Leafs players are on the table including Matthews and Marner.
Let's go.....
Well they offered him 14, he took less.He extended 8 because his GM isn't enough of an idiot to let him make 13 mil a year while also not buying term with it
Not really. I think Mcdavid would jump at the chance to play in TO
All Leafs players are on the table including Matthews and Marner.
Let's go.....
He actually was offered 13 and took less with same term. He wanted the team to have flexibility to sign other players.He extended 8 because his GM isn't enough of an idiot to let him make 13 mil a year while also not buying term with it
Please do go on the main board with this. I'll like it.Careful if you go on the main board with this one.................The Oilers fans may not like this.......
Why would they ever move McDavid? Doesn't make any sense.
With him in an Oilers uniform and nobody outside of Canadian media gives a damn about the Oilers.
Imagine what happens to that wheelbarrow franchise when McDavid is not there.
they fall off the map completely.
I think he could. He is actually more dangerous in the Dzone with the puck than he is in the Ozone bc he got more room to skate, lol.Can he be our #1 dman? Could use one of those.
screw it, i'll bite - I would only trade for McDavid if it meant Matthews stayed with the team...otherwise, what's the point? Seeing as how McDavid is locked in for 6 years, I'd center it around Marner. I think Matthews can live with losing his bff if it meant getting McDavid. This is basically to double down and go for it all in the next 4-5 years and hope that cheap vets like Spezza, Bogosian keep signing here (I think they will with a McDavid-Matthews tandem). Edmonton gets to rebuild with a boatload of assets and still has a strong, young trio of Marner/Draisaitl/Nurse.
Team defence still needs work, but you'd probably re-sign Rielly and hope that Campbell is a 1A starter on an AAV of 4-5 mil after next season, and you get a nice 1B/top tier backup in his mid-30s for about $2 mil AAV. Leafs are banking on Tavares remaining productive throughout the remainder of his contract when eventually converted to a winger. Leafs would then hope some guys like Niemela, Hirvonen, Abramov, etc. make it to the NHL as cheap regulars.
The Leafs put all their chips on the table with the deal below, but they kind of already did that when they signed Tavares. Might as well go for broke and reset in 5 seasons if it goes tits up
To TOR:
- McDavid
To EDM:
- Marner
- Amirov
- Sandin
- Robertson
- 3 1st round picks
- 2 3rd round picks
Could you imagine trading away the best player in the world twice as an organization in 40 years? No way it happens.
Only chance is if Matthews dips to Arizona and two years later during free agency McDavid chooses to play at home ala Tavares.
I don't care about Toronto/Edmonton whatever. Why would a team trade the best player in the league for a 'shake up.' It doesn't make sense. Unless McDavid is refusing to play for Edmonton, or is so unhappy that it is toxic (no evidence of this), there is no way he is traded.There is a picture of a shocked 18 year old from 6 years ago. Please disregard the fact mcdavid said he can't wait to get out of Toronto and signed an 8 year extension.
Sorry kid, going have to stay firm here. How about if I add a 2nd, alright deal. Thank you for your business bud.If the Leafs make the call, they better be ready to include Mathews. marner and Travares in the deal, if not then don't bother calling cause Mac is in a much higher level then Mathews, Marner and Tarvares. Neither of these three can dominate a game like Mac can. But it would hurt the leafs more to giv these up so Mac stays with the oilers.
Not really. I think Mcdavid would jump at the chance to play in TO