The only similarity between Gretzky and Ovechkin is they both scored a lot of goals. Gretzky scored a lot of goals early in his career because frankly, the league was wide open for him. If you compare Gretzky's and Ovechkin's scoring you'll see that Ovechkin at 32+ is scoring at a higher clip than Gretzky did age 25+ which is why we're having this discussion in the first place.Because there are no others to compare him too? Gretzky declined in goal scoring after 30 and was a shell at 38.
By that logic, if Crosby was to retire today: is he only the 36th greatest offensive player in league history?If Crosby plays out his career but only finishes with 1600 points: are Sakic, Yzerman, Dionne, Francis, Messier all greater offensive players than Crosby was?I think he has a chance but it's getting slimmer all the time. One thing I'm wondering about is how so many on here calls him the greatest goal-scorer of all-time. Isn't Gretzky the greatest if Ovi does not beat his record? Both are phenomenal of course, but whoever has the most is the greatest. Right? Or is it consensus that Ovi's era is tougher and he had shorter seasons and without that, he'd definitely beat Wayne's record? Just wondering...
Well I would say that offensive player is a broader category than greatest goal scorer. With a broader category, there would be more factors. Right?By that logic, if Crosby was to retire today: is he only the 36th greatest offensive player in league history?If Crosby plays out his career but only finishes with 1600 points: are Sakic, Yzerman, Dionne, Francis, Messier all greater offensive players than Crosby was?
I think we both know that's just silly.
Seems like semantics. Change my questions to “greatest point scorer”, and the underlying point still stands.Well I would say that offensive player is a broader category than greatest goal scorer. With a broader category, there would be more factors. Right?
I guess I can see that. Crosby would be considered a better player than many on your list even if he retired now. And because of other factors, many consider Ovi better than Gretzky at goal-scoring at least. The numbers don't tell the whole story, but are a useful guide. I'm learning, man. Haha. Thanks for the cool discussion.Seems like semantics. Change my questions to “greatest point scorer”, and the underlying point still stands.
Figures smh. I'm probably the only one on this forum that doesn't want him to do it.4 goals in his last 5 games!
Why?Figures smh. I'm probably the only one on this forum that doesn't want him to do it.
I'll admit that I am an old Gretzky mark. 175 to go. I think he'll do it now.Why?
I'll admit that I am an old Gretzky mark. 175 to go. I think he'll do it now.
All good if he gets it. I'm not an Ovi hater.177 to get to 895.
I am a huge Gretzky fan, too. Even if he doesn't end up having the goals record, he'll have to console himself with his 60+ odd records or whatever it is.
Gretzky will remain the greatest player of all time.
Hopefully... NONE. ZERO. ZILCH.
Some records are made not to be broken.
Weird position to takeHopefully... NONE. ZERO. ZILCH.
Some records are made not to be broken.
I'm sure Gretzky himself feels the exact opposite of this sentiment. Dude would probably be thrilled that Ovi managed to break his goals record, and why shouldn't he be? That record's stood unopposed for longer than a fair few people have even been alive. To see it be broken would be the same feeling as when he broke Howe's.Hopefully... NONE. ZERO. ZILCH.
Some records are made not to be broken.
What's the point of a record, if not for it to be an invitation to eventually be broken by someone?
Weird position to take
I'm sure Gretzky himself feels the exact opposite of this sentiment. Dude would probably be thrilled that Ovi managed to break his goals record, and why shouldn't he be? That record's stood unopposed for longer than a fair few people have even been alive. To see it be broken would be the same feeling as when he broke Howe's.
I was thinking about this the other day. This would be really big for most players, for Ovi it was just a routine stop people barely noticed. The weight of expectations is a bitch.Passing the great Phil Esposito would be a pretty slick feat for anyone else.
It really, really doesn't. Obviously it has advantages but the goalies have infinitely improved in technique, body size and along with equipment size making it much more difficult to score. This is the single biggest change across eras. Then you add speed and how less amount of space you have to even shoot the puck comparatively, along with defensemen that don't fall down with one simple juke and it's nowhere near an apt comparison.Gretzky didn't play in an era where his soaking wet blue long sleeve undershirt weighed the same as the top half of today's equipment, let alone the stick and skate technology. Knife cuts both ways, bud.
Ovechkin in his prime was bigger, faster, stronger on the puck and could score in more ways than Bossy ever could. People have this conception that Ovi couldn't stick handle end to end and score in every way possible for 6 years. That's your choice but I'm definitely taking Ovechkin here.If I had to bet my life on one guy to score against a random NHL goalie, from any era since the 70s, I'd want the puck carrier to be a healthy, in-his-prime Mike Bossy. Dude could score any kind of goal, from anywhere. He had laser velocity, pinpoint accuracy, great decision-making/shot selection ability, and a very low unforced error rate (missing the net, losing an edge, other types of f***ing up).
Bossy was deadly with the puck. Gretzky flat out said Bossy was a better goal scorer than he was (to be fair he also said this about Lemieux).