13-2-1 without Rielly in the lineup.
It’s funny that we have our best defensive games when our “1D” isn’t playing.
It’s funny that we have our best defensive games when our “1D” isn’t playing.
13-2-1 without Rielly in the lineup.
It’s funny that we have our best defensive games when our “1D” isn’t playing.
13-2-1 without Rielly in the lineup.
It’s funny that we have our best defensive games when our “1D” isn’t playing.
It was not a better defensive game than against islanders, it was just a game Murray step up...
leafs had a better first 40 vs islanders than against panthers... The difference was Murray made key save, Samsonov didn't ( dont think he was really focus in this game). So unstead of trailing but 2 after 2, they get a 2 goal lead after 2...
No matter how you slice it the Leafs are unstoppable when Rielly is not in the lineup. Their .900 winning record without him this year is not a small sample size.
Ngl i'd love to see how Phaneuf would do on this team
Now that might work because we've already got Eeyore as coach.If I had to choose between Rielly and Winnie the Pooh, I'd choose Winnie as a number one dman. Same belligerence and testosterone, but Winnie would play better defensive game.
You guys would blow your lid if you saw our record without Matthews. Guess we should ship him out too. Maybe package Matthews and Reilly together and save 18-19mil in cap?
33-16-2Why don’t you post the team’s record with and without Matthews? I guarantee there wouldn’t be such a drastic difference compared to the record without Rielly.
Nevertheless, Matthews is an elite scorer and one of the best players in the game and has the numbers to back it up. Meanwhile Rielly is one of the worst defensive players in the league with probably the worst GA in the entire NHL over the last several years. He doesn’t bring much offensively either especially considering he is gifted PP minutes despite barely contributing anything other than secondary assists. He is also always on the ice with the teams top offensive players yet he is the only minus D on the team. The guy is just a terrible defenceman overall and a black hole.
As long as Piglet is his wingman.If I had to choose between Rielly and Winnie the Pooh, I'd choose Winnie as a number one dman. Same belligerence and testosterone, but Winnie would play better defensive game.
I'm all for it. Get players with some grit.You guys would blow your lid if you saw our record without Matthews. Guess we should ship him out too. Maybe package Matthews and Reilly together and save 18-19mil in cap?
33-16-2
Reilly is one of the best offensive Dmen of his generation. Check the numbers for yourself.
He’s 13th in points among Dmen since coming into the league.So the team’s record without Matthews is nowhere near as good as without Rielly.
Tyson Barrie has averaged more PPG than Rielly over his career. Rielly is nowhere near being one of the best offensive defenceman over the last decade. Plus his abysmal play defensively negates what little he brings offensively. The guy can’t even QB a PP.
Ekholm apparently lacked any form of trade veto?So I thought he would surely be a top 4 defenseman for us at least through most of the contract and he took less to sign with us but damn the defensive limitations of the guy and the fact is he's not that dynamic offensively either. No shot like a Krug, Karlsson or even Ghost.
He does pass to some amazing forwards which helps you collect the apples.
That's not to say Rielly is shit but Maybe I value him closer to 4-5M than I would 7.5M.
This year especially the defensive warts have been apparent and I thought the group collectively looked better without him in the line up.
When Rielly, Muzzin and Brodie all went down I figured that Muzzin wasn't coming back. I also figuered that Brodie could be re-incorporated into the line up without messing our defensive cohesion.
I was a little weary about Rielly coming into the line up and felt we looked worse defensively with him.
I'd like to get out of the deal if we can, Nashville traded Ekholm in the 1st year into the new contract so why can't we?
He’s 13th in points among Dmen since coming into the league.
For the record the leafs overall are 36-18-7 without Morgan. Very similar to matthews. Point is the metrics are pointless, and you’re grasping at straws.
He did.Ekholm apparently lacked any form of trade veto?
For sure. I was intending to suggest that clause - or lack thereof - potentially being the difference. Ekholm couldn't have blocked that trade whether he wished to or not whereas Rielly can veto almost anything for quite some time.He did.
The Leafs would need to accommodate Rielly on it or he could dig in his heels if he truly wanted to.
For sure. I was intending to suggest that clause - or lack thereof - potentially being the difference. Ekholm couldn't have blocked that trade whether he wished to or not whereas Rielly can veto almost anything for quite some time.
I never said he was generational, reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit.13th is not considered generational in anyone’s mind, you are delusional to think he is some kind of legend.
There is no debate Matthews is an elite talent so your comparison is ridiculous.
The team bleeds goals when Rielly is on the ice, he is atrocious defensively and there is really no debate about this either.
The man isn’t even that great on the PPMcCabe-Liljegren and Gio-Brodie should play the majority of the game 5 on 5. Rielly-Schenn should be sheltered with Schenn getting P.K time and Rielly getting P.P time. But I wouldn’t even mind if Rielly is at 17-18 minutes a game with 5-6 of those minutes on the P.P. The top 4 guys will have to eat a lot of minutes, like 23+ minutes. This is how I see it until Rielly learns to play defence. Which I don’t think he ever will.