Melrose Munch
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2007
- 24,237
- 2,316
I'm not sure why you'd say "purely as a goaltender" as though it doesn't factor into his overall positional value?
This reminds me of when people talk about a player like Erik Karlsson or whatever and pound their fist "A DEFENSEMAN'S JOB IS TO DEFEND! PERIOD!"
The reason it hasn't "caught on" is simple, most goaltenders just can't do what Brodeur did, it doesn't make Brodeur's value artificially lower. It's just really rare across hockey history.
Can you elaborate?Not a great person.
Brodeur's first wife filed for divorce in the middle of the 2003 playoffs. There were rumors that he was having an affair with her sister.Can you elaborate?
I've never heard that about him but love the gossip mill!
On a play off series my top guysWhile he was playing, he was a consensus top 3 goalie of all time. Roy, Hasek, Brodeur. You could put them in any order and no one could really tell you you were wrong.
Now a few years after his retirement, it seems he has plummeted down the all time rankings. Everyone has Roy/Hasek as 1/2 and Brodeur is only top 5 or top 10. The same tier as guys like Sawchuk or Dryden.
What happened?
never knew thisBrodeur's first wife filed for divorce in the middle of the 2003 playoffs. There were rumors that he was having an affair with her sister.
Well, he ended up marrying said sister 5 years later.
Make of that what you will.
Not sure anyone gives a crap in terms of how they view him as a historical hockey figureBrodeur's first wife filed for divorce in the middle of the 2003 playoffs. There were rumors that he was having an affair with her sister.
Well, he ended up marrying said sister 5 years later.
Make of that what you will.
Don't question the posters Moral superioritay!Not sure anyone gives a crap in terms of how they view him as a historical hockey figure
Look at Magic Johnson, still beloved after his escapades in locker room hot tub after games
Not to condone all that but womanizing is commonplace in the sports world but what the hell do I know!
He asked why a poster said he's not a great person and I simply gave the reason as to why they might think that.Don't question the posters Moral superioritay!
He’ll go down as the best St. Louis Blues goaltender in franchise history.
I don’t think it’s a stats thing, I think every single one of his stats are better than Roy’s.
Sorry, but Brodeur was overwhelmingly part of the "top 3 goalies of all time", I am actually more surprised to find out he isn't anymore...?None of this is true.
If you believe this was true, then that explains what happened to his legacy since. Brodeur is well-considered as a top ten goaltender of all time, but top three is (and was) a stretch.
He’ll go down as the best St. Louis Blues goaltender in franchise history.
Good thing I scrolled through the pages before posting "Marty doesn't even get that because Jacques Plante exists..."the hilarious thing is he won’t, because their first year the blues had glenn hall and then in year two added jacques plante.
when i was a kid (early 90s) there was a clear top three: sawchuk, plante, and hall. then as he filled out his career and eventually beat sawchuk’s record, roy made it a top four and soon after hasek expanded it to a top five. eventually brodeur made it a top six. but at no point have i ever seen anyone other than presentists who don’t believe in anything pre-gretzky ever suggest that brodeur was definitively top three.
I believe records show the devils stats guy was a notorious shots under counter, which skewed the shots against lower at home. This has been shown looking at the home and road stats in brodeur’s prime years and would likely have at least some effect on his save percentage.The guy faced 20-23 shots a game during his prime with the stingiest defence any goalie of that era had the pleausure of playing behind. Most of the shots he did face were of the crappy or less dangerous variety as it took a lot to get around the trap and be good offensively.
Ah yes....I was only looking at regular season, but point stands....don't think it's a stats thingthe hilarious thing is he won’t, because their first year the blues had glenn hall and then in year two added jacques plante.
when i was a kid (early 90s) there was a clear top three: sawchuk, plante, and hall. then as he filled out his career and eventually beat sawchuk’s record, roy made it a top four and soon after hasek expanded it to a top five. eventually brodeur made it a top six. but at no point have i ever seen anyone other than presentists who don’t believe in anything pre-gretzky ever suggest that brodeur was definitively top three.
playoff wins?
Brodeur's first wife filed for divorce in the middle of the 2003 playoffs. There were rumors that he was having an affair with her sister.
Well, he ended up marrying said sister 5 years later.
Make of that what you will.
Hot take but Roy was the overrated one due to the defense in front of him. Not Brodeur.
A better picture of Roy is the Avealanches. Yes he was good enough to win a cup with on a stacked team. But led the league in nothing. Great goaler but not top 5 all time. The only difference from Roy to Chris Osgood is a bit more attitude.
While he was playing, he was a consensus top 3 goalie of all time. Roy, Hasek, Brodeur. You could put them in any order and no one could really tell you you were wrong.
Now a few years after his retirement, it seems he has plummeted down the all time rankings. Everyone has Roy/Hasek as 1/2 and Brodeur is only top 5 or top 10. The same tier as guys like Sawchuk or Dryden.
What happened?
Keep in mind Roy played more than 400 regular season games (and more than 100 playoff games) in a high-scoring era (mid 1980's to early 1990's) before Brodeur became a starter. Adjusting for era, Roy is well ahead of Brodeur in terms of save percentage, both in the regular season and playoffs.I don’t think it’s a stats thing, I think every single one of his stats are better than Roy’s.
Who is “everyone”?