JoeSakic13
Registered User
He’ll go down as the best St. Louis Blues goaltender in franchise history.
What happened to Brodeur's legacy?
- Thread starter 895
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Cup or Bust
Registered User
- Oct 17, 2017
- 4,616
- 4,170
Brodeur was a franchise goalie but I don't think he was better than either Belfour or Kiprusoff. He makes an all-time list based on longevity and accolades but I personally don't think he was a better goalie than either. He just happened to play a lot of years for the most stingy defensive franchise of the last 30 years. That is not to take away from him as a goalie because he still had the pressure and still made the saves he needed to and won the games he won, you can't take that away from him. I just never found him to be a very dominant goalie. Throughout his entire career I considered him one of the better goalies in the league but never felt I was watching one of the best of all-time.
- Dec 20, 2018
- 23,238
- 52,841
I don’t remember that consensus. Sure he got media love while playing, but he still gets that.
But Brodeur had a pack of rabid detractors online, including someone with an infamous “Brodeur is a Fraud” blog.
It was definitely a thing on HFBoards throughout his career.
Those spicy takes were fueled by Luongo fandom and Roy fandom and hate from “the Devils ruined hockey” and absence of any decent goalie analytics and god knows what else.
That’s mostly gone away. This is a 2018 ESPN article looking back on this.
The “Brodeur is a Fraud” guy changed his tune in 2013
I don’t see any plummeting. People put these players in different order. I’ve seen Roy put ahead of Hasek and that seems like lunacy, but this stuff is subjective.
Brodeur still is a top 5 goalie of all time and the people who try to tarnish his reputation are fans that even though they are older now still think Sean Avery was funny and people who feel the need to show how morally superior they are compared to others. You usually find them rushing to be the first to condemn or badmouth someone whenever a controversy comes up.
Why care what dregs of this website think?
Why care what dregs of this website think?
Just to reiterate my earlier post, I think most people don't seem to give Brodeur credit for contributing to that level of stinginess. His puckhandling made life a lot easier on his D as he could diffuse a lot of dump ins on his own. Lou was slow to adapt to the idea that you ought to have righties play on the right side since Brodeur helped them out. New Jersey had some lackluster blue lines after the lockout but Brodeur had some of his better individual seasons.
2007-08 Devils defense:
Johnny Oduya (solid, but probably not an ideal top pairing guy) - Paul Martin (solid but had to play on right side)
Colin White (decent stay at home D) - Mike Mottau (picked up off the scrap heap, hadn't played in the NHL since 2003)
Vitali Vishnevski (could make some highlight reel hits but would be out of the NHL the following year) - Andy Greene (second year in NHL, still getting acclimated)
pi314
Registered User
Friend of mine is a 14-year former NHLer and says Brodeur was the best he ever faced.
Was teammates with Roy for a period and said Patrick was a douche.
Was teammates with Roy for a period and said Patrick was a douche.
Casper The Soy Ghost
Registered User
- Jan 11, 2013
- 8,822
- 5,376
Mirka the Turka
Jesus loves you
- Oct 20, 2022
- 1,180
- 2,006
He’s the GOAT by far
Most regular season wins. He carried numerous bad Devils teams to the playoffs - something Roy could never do
Most regular season wins. He carried numerous bad Devils teams to the playoffs - something Roy could never do
Oddbob
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2016
- 16,943
- 11,532
True. Everyone told him, don't go to New Jersey now, your career here will be ruined! But he knew better!
These Are The Days
I need about tree fiddy
A lot of all time greats are a perfect storm. You have the right guy in the right situation at the right time with the right talent around him. Brodeur was every bit as great on his own as he was a product of a system that revolutionized and transformed the NHL from about the mid 1990's til the lockout. It's not any different than if you wanted to call Joe Burrow the greatest college QB of all time. You have a hell of a great argument. And also remember the dude basically had an NFL-level offense around him in Justin Jefferson, Ja'Marr Chase and Clyde Edwards-Helaire and Chase and Jefferson can perhaps be considered the best receivers today.
That's Brodeur's career in a nutshell. In a NHL where Dom Hasek could literally save the universe on his own and Patrick Roy has a mind-boggling 151 playoff wins he does not get a lot of sympathy
That's Brodeur's career in a nutshell. In a NHL where Dom Hasek could literally save the universe on his own and Patrick Roy has a mind-boggling 151 playoff wins he does not get a lot of sympathy
Last edited:
I don’t think it’s a stats thing, I think every single one of his stats are better than Roy’s.
Oddbob
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2016
- 16,943
- 11,532
The guy faced 20-23 shots a game during his prime with the stingiest defence any goalie of that era had the pleausure of playing behind. Most of the shots he did face were of the crappy or less dangerous variety as it took a lot to get around the trap and be good offensively.
hamzarocks
Registered User
The only ppl who are questioning Gret legacy are:
1) Lemieux Truther who think he was better/dominant than 99. Dont agree. He could have been had he been healthy but he wasnt so he falls somewhere 2-4 range
2) Mcdavid hypebeasts: Mcdavid is the most skilled and talented player since Lemiuex. Hes already the 5th best player ever and hes only entering year 9. He has a small chance to best Gretzky but its very small. Gretzky was a top 5 player in dead puck era at late 30s with a bad back.
Gretzky's legacy is likely never being touched
Only 2 true threats have existed. 1 couldnt try to beat him due to health/injuries and the other as great as he is, doesnt seem capable of dominating his peers like Gretzky did
Yaya someone brought him up ! He had such a drastic fall from grace while still being quite young
njdevils1982
Hell Toupée!!!
i remember that post....right when he changed the blog site name.
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,561
- 12,711
I think it's partly just an artifact of how perceptions shift over time. He's caught in a little bit of an awkward middleground in a lot of respects.
He wasn't the otherworldly completely unique and never again to be replicated puckstopper like Hasek. He wasn't the defining pioneer at the cutting edge of the style of goaltending that has come to universally dominate the landscape ever since.
Brodeur's big contribution to the fabric of the game was basically...getting the trapezoid created. Which is interesting, but not necessarily a strictly "goaltending" thing. The way he actually stopped pucks was...not very revolutionary at all. In fact, i think it actually contributes to perceptions in the way he hung on a lot longer than pretty much anyone else playing a sort of standup hybrid.
That hurts perceptions where he starts to look like a bit of a "compiler" who just hung around forever and piled up wins on dominant teams behind an infamously robust defensive system. Especially with other more "modern style" netminders who had statistically similar or better numbers spelling him at times.
It also puts him into a weird crossover territory where he reaches back to an era that has started to fade from memory, but hasn't reached that historic nostalgia threshold yet per se. He sort of straddled two eras in a way. There's been enough time to really weigh what some of the older "all time greats" really achieved in context. It hasn't necessarily been as kind of Brodeur's contributions.
All that said though...I don't think he was ever seriously considered "Top-3 All Time". He was arguably Top-3 of that era, but there were always others with a claim who crossed over with different parts of his playing career at any given point.
He's firmly in that Top-5 of all time conversation. Not necessarily a lock, but he's got a darn strong case. So i don't think anything has particularly happened to his "legacy". So much as some people have had time to reflect and adjust what may have been overhype at times.
He wasn't the otherworldly completely unique and never again to be replicated puckstopper like Hasek. He wasn't the defining pioneer at the cutting edge of the style of goaltending that has come to universally dominate the landscape ever since.
Brodeur's big contribution to the fabric of the game was basically...getting the trapezoid created. Which is interesting, but not necessarily a strictly "goaltending" thing. The way he actually stopped pucks was...not very revolutionary at all. In fact, i think it actually contributes to perceptions in the way he hung on a lot longer than pretty much anyone else playing a sort of standup hybrid.
That hurts perceptions where he starts to look like a bit of a "compiler" who just hung around forever and piled up wins on dominant teams behind an infamously robust defensive system. Especially with other more "modern style" netminders who had statistically similar or better numbers spelling him at times.
It also puts him into a weird crossover territory where he reaches back to an era that has started to fade from memory, but hasn't reached that historic nostalgia threshold yet per se. He sort of straddled two eras in a way. There's been enough time to really weigh what some of the older "all time greats" really achieved in context. It hasn't necessarily been as kind of Brodeur's contributions.
All that said though...I don't think he was ever seriously considered "Top-3 All Time". He was arguably Top-3 of that era, but there were always others with a claim who crossed over with different parts of his playing career at any given point.
He's firmly in that Top-5 of all time conversation. Not necessarily a lock, but he's got a darn strong case. So i don't think anything has particularly happened to his "legacy". So much as some people have had time to reflect and adjust what may have been overhype at times.
- Dec 20, 2018
- 23,238
- 52,841
The contrarian whining was at its peak when Brodeur was winning Vezinas, the angry mobs were dispersing by the end of his career.
There was a good amount of bitching in 2000s about Brodeur on HFBoards.
I still remember a very active poster who said Broduer was the ~5th (maybe lower lol) best goalie in the NHL when he was winning Vezinas.
You were here for it some it, 2007 was a rich lperiod as there was a rabid pro-Luongo faction very cranky at that point over Luongo not having won a Vezina.
Players ranking shift with different groups, at different times, for different reasons, so I need to know what ranking he’s referring to.
Most popular discussions skip pre-expansion goalies. Dryden is the only older post-expansion goalie who ranks near the top 3 and Brodeur typically gets ranked higher than him.
Any rankings involving all-time NHL goalies is beyond my pay grade, I can’t rank Plante, Sawchuk, etc
- Mar 4, 2004
- 30,587
- 30,989
One things' for sure the dude was a workhorse. Twelve seasons he started 70 games or more.
He had 1,266 starts. That's over 200 more than Roy and over 500 more than Hasek.
He started 200+ more games than Luongo, who is next closest to him on the all-time list. That is some serious focus and durability.
I have Hasek as #1 all time but I do think Brodeur is starting to get underrated here. He was very good for a very long time.
He had 1,266 starts. That's over 200 more than Roy and over 500 more than Hasek.
He started 200+ more games than Luongo, who is next closest to him on the all-time list. That is some serious focus and durability.
I have Hasek as #1 all time but I do think Brodeur is starting to get underrated here. He was very good for a very long time.
WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 32,653
- 22,500
I think you’re underrating the sweeper keeper aspect. Brodeur’s ability to play the puck was generational and did so much to make the Lemaire system work as well as it did.
This seems like an overly simplistic view like the Devils were the only team who played the trap? As I mentioned in a previous post, the Brodeur era Devils were always among the least penalized teams in the league. That went for awhile post-lockout after Stevens retired and Niedermayer departed.
2005-06: 1/30
2006-07: 1/30
2007-08: 5/30
2008-09: 9/30 -- Brodeur missed a few months with injury
2009-10: 1/30
2010-11: 1/30
2011-12: 10/30
2012-13: 22/30
2013-14: 13/30 -- split season with Schneider
-- Brodeur departs
2014-15: 24/30
2015-16: 20/30
2016-17: 22/30
2017-18: 17/30
Just because I needed the nightmare fuel, here were the D that Lou put together post-lockout. Some folks were certain Brodeur would get exposed after Stevens/Niedermayer left but he had some of his better individual seasons. I think you're being cynical if you don't want to give Marty some credit for making these groups look better than they were:
In the wake of Niedermayer/Stevens not returning, Lou mistakingly brought in Dan McGillis and Vladimir Malakhov. To his credit, he realized his error. McGillis was jettisoned to the AHL and never played in the NHL again. Malakhov left and never came back. We didn't know it at the time, but this would also be Richard Matvichuk's last season in the NHL.
Lukowich and Klee were brought in at the deadline. Somehow this team won the division.
More stability than the previous year. Johnny Oduya was signed an unheralded free agent from Europe and was solid. But definitely not an awe inspiring defense.
Unfortunately Lou lowballed Rafalski who took a better deal with Detroit. Vitali Vishnevski was signed to a 3 year deal but he only played one before he was sent to Russia. This would also be Rachunek's (RIP) last season in the NHL. Mike Mottau hadn't played in the NHL since 2003 and suddenly was a 20 minute guy playing on his weak side. Bryce Salvador was brought in at the deadline and Andy Greene started to show glimpses. Brodeur won a Vezina this season with an almost all left shot defense. Brookbank had a breakout AHL season and the Devils claimed him with the hopes he might be a RD option but that never really materialized.
Some continuity from the previous season. But still not exactly a defense that I would characterize as amazing by any stretch of the imagination.
From what I remember, Oduya signed an extension and really struggled this season before he was included in the Kovalchuk trade. Greene had an offensive breakout. Philadelphia exploited our all left shot D in the playoffs.
This was the Murphy's law season where things fell apart. Paul Martin left as a free agent and the team signed Henrik Tallinder and Anton Volchenkov. Bryce Salvador missed the season with injury. Colin White would be bought out in the offseason and retire a year after that. Mark Fayne was a first year pro who was probably #12 or #13 on the depth chart to start the season. If only because he was RH, he ended up sticking.
Lou finally added some right shot D. Drafted Adam Larsson, brought in Anton Stralman on a PTO, and traded for Kurtis Foster. At the deadline, he added Marek Zidlicky. Solid group but probably not an All-Star among the bunch. A 39/40 year old Brodeur backstopped this group to a SCF appearance.
Last edited:
Thechozen1
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2021
- 2,906
- 4,266
I love Brodeur and have him firmly in the top 3 if that era (top 5 all time) but let’s not downplay ROY. Roy out duelled Brodeur the only time they faced each other in the Stanley Cup Final and Brodeur had the 3-2 series lead.
Roy was pretty instrumental in the Canadiens 1993 Cup victory.
Last edited:
ricky0034
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2010
- 15,548
- 8,031
the masses always overhype all-time greats towards the end of their career and that goes away as time passes and they're no longer the current trend
like how at the end of Lidstrom's career you kept seeing people say he was easily the #2 all time at his position and a surprisingly high amount of people even going so far as to say he was better than Orr but now that he's been retired for a while people are back to largely viewing him as worse than Bourque
like how at the end of Lidstrom's career you kept seeing people say he was easily the #2 all time at his position and a surprisingly high amount of people even going so far as to say he was better than Orr but now that he's been retired for a while people are back to largely viewing him as worse than Bourque
983 others
Registered User
- Aug 26, 2009
- 816
- 1,135
hes universally regarded as a top 7ish or better goalie in the history of the sport
seems like a fine legacy
seems like a fine legacy
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,561
- 12,711
I don't think i'm really underrating it. It's noted and he was undeniably influential in some rule changes, which is a big deal. A lot of that was all just geared at breaking up the system though, more so than goaltender puckhandling specifically. The two are kind of intrinsically linked, and that's where...purely as a goaltender, i don't like to inflate the value of that sort of "bonus" ability. It feels like attributing to goaltending, something that is equally attributable to systems play.
The reality is, rules changes or not...that ability to handle the puck, direct rebounds as though they're outlet passes, etc...just never really caught on. It was a different evolution of the old stand-up style, but a branch that largely died out.
WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 32,653
- 22,500
I'm not sure why you'd say "purely as a goaltender" as though it doesn't factor into his overall positional value?
This reminds me of when people talk about a player like Erik Karlsson or whatever and pound their fist "A DEFENSEMAN'S JOB IS TO DEFEND! PERIOD!"
The reason it hasn't "caught on" is simple, most goaltenders just can't do what Brodeur did, it doesn't make Brodeur's value artificially lower. It's just really rare across hockey history.
