I’m just saying the “Reaves shouldn’t fight because of penalties” isn’t a valid argument considering we’re playing 4v5 at ES when he’s on the ice but at least on the PK we’re allowed to ice it. Reaves in the box or suspended for literally any of the Bruins players on LTIR is a massive win for us both by hurting Boston and forcing them to get an actual NHL player instead of Reaves for however many games he’s suspended.
Edit:
Reaves at ES: 6 GA in 70 minutes
Leafs PK: 8 GA in 53 minutes
I was just kidding at first but on further inspection Reaves actually has a decent shot at having a worse defensive impact than being down a man. The PK is almost all D-zone starts against the opponents best forwards, Reaves gets 60% offensive zone starts against 4th lines.
And this is the best he’ll ever be for the remainder of his 3 year contract.
There was a goal the other night vs the Kings where the 4th line got caught on in their zone and the Kings were cycling. Reaves was so lost he was turning around just to find a guy to cover.
Now 4th lines getting caught on the ice vs 1st lines happen but I can't ever remember our 4th liners being so bad they literally got lost in the flow of play.
I had this hot take when Engvall got traded that people would really miss him without realizing it. Engvall was actually a very good defensive forward and one of the few guys that had any sort of offensive chemistry with Kampf. Was her perfect? No. But if he was he wouldn't be a bottom six guy. Connor Brown wasn't perfect, Trevor Moore wasn't perfect, Andreas Johnsson wasn't perfect, Kapanen wasn't perfect but they were all playable.
The fanbase wanted bottom sixers that didn't do anything but act tough and play like shit and they got exactly what they asked for in Reaves and completely forgot about the Burke years when we had a line of Mclaren, Orr and Fraser that did absolutely nothing but get scored on.