ANDI P IS CUTE
Registered User
We win in regulation or overtime we win.
Well actually pretty much win you make it lose u dont
so if u lose, then what? boston/phili?
We win in regulation or overtime we win.
Well actually pretty much win you make it lose u dont
As a proponent defending Z and Wings veterans down the stretch I humbly agree tonight was evidence of the argument against the allotment of their bloated ITs. They had nothing in the tank. Carefully trimming minutes the last month our team might have been more fresh in Boston.
so if u lose, then what? boston/phili?
I am so shocked that a 35 year old who was never all that fast to begin with and is being overplayed and on the back of a back to back didn't have much left in the tank.
*shocked*
How many of you were calling for less veteran minutes for the old guard and more for the new kids on the block?
Well AA played nearly 13; 12 for Jurco; 15 for nyquist and Tatar.
Abdelkader played 15; Pav 17; kronwall logged 15 (!); Zetterberg played 16.
Now how did that turn out for the team?
Of course there are other circumstances such as the back to back and less than stellar goaltending.
Still it's not as simple as MANY of you have been making out to be.
And talking about guys being gassed... Larkin is skating at like 50% of his capability right now.
But hey, Z and Richards aren't defensive liabilities, Z and Richards have resume and pedigree, tie goes to the veteran, it's a man's league.
/s
While I understand your argument it's not fair to lump them both together. One is our captain and has been a Wing almost 14 years. The other is an aged vet bought out by NY wandering from team to team who has proven nothing of substance for the DRW. There is a difference.
How many of you were calling for less veteran minutes for the old guard and more for the new kids on the block?
Well AA played nearly 13; 12 for Jurco; 15 for nyquist and Tatar.
Abdelkader played 15; Pav 17; kronwall logged 15 (!); Zetterberg played 16.
Now how did that turn out for the team?
Of course there are other circumstances such as the back to back and less than stellar goaltending.
Still it's not as simple as MANY of you have been making out to be.
While I understand your argument it's not fair to lump them both together. One is our captain and has been a Wing almost 14 years. The other is an aged vet bought out by NY wandering from team to team who has proven nothing of substance for the DRW. There is a difference.
The young guys played more because the Wings were getting blown out. Not vice versa.
Nostalgia is just that, nostalgia. Neither are top 6 centers at this point in their career. I don't care what Z did for the Wings 4 years ago......Blashill should determine his TOI based on what he can do NOW.
Zetterberg is absolutely a top 6 center on this team. Until another player pushes him to the bottom 6(where, frankly, your strange vendetta and one note commentary on him is completely unwarranted, and on this team, the bottom 6 is not where he belongs AT all). He's going to absolutely be in the top 6. The reality is, Hank produces like a top 6 player, he has possession of a top 6 player, and therefore, IS a top 6 player. Just because you don't like him, doesn't mean he doesn't belong there. Your empirical bias doesn't actually mean a thing.
Does he deserve less ice time? Yes. Do other players deserve more? Yes. But the radical absolutist angle is getting old as hell.
Well, if I'm the rangers, I'd rather play the cats than the pens, so I guess the Wings have that going for them I guess
Nah...he doesn't play like or produce like a top 6 center anymore...or should I say a quality top 6 center. You and others are looking at Zetterberg through the prism of who he was 3-4 years ago, not the player he is now. He's a 3rd line player, and that's not an insult or a disrespectful opinion to have. It's the reality of where he is as a hockey player and the most effective way to use him at the tail end of his career. Last night spoke volumes about this subject...Julien clearly wanted Bergeron against Hank because he felt he had an advantage there, and Bergeron ate Hank up and completely outplayed him all night. In Hank's prime he was a guy used to chase a line and dominate the opposition's best forward. Those days are long gone. Hopefully next year his role is reduced and reflects the player he is today, not the player he used to be.Zetterberg is absolutely a top 6 center on this team. Until another player pushes him to the bottom 6(where, frankly, your strange vendetta and one note commentary on him is completely unwarranted, and on this team, the bottom 6 is not where he belongs AT all). He's going to absolutely be in the top 6. The reality is, Hank produces like a top 6 player, he has possession of a top 6 player, and therefore, IS a top 6 player. Just because you don't like him, doesn't mean he doesn't belong there. Your empirical bias doesn't actually mean a thing.
Does he deserve less ice time? Yes. Do other players deserve more? Yes. But the radical absolutist angle is getting old as hell.
Game on Saturday will be there 3rd game in 4 nights on top of being an afternoon game.
Don't hold much hope for a win.
Heres hoping the NYR tank on purpose to avoid the Penguins
Howard was bad, very bad. 1st goal he has to cover low and force him to lift the puck on the backhand.Hope Howie gets the start. Nothing about tonight is on him.
The team was exhausted after the game vs flyers. Too bad the leafs did not win.Never expected a win anyway. But not even seeing them getting that point was really disappointing. Always great to realize how well we match up with them.
Guess after that game Saturday, u can call the ambulance for me. Heart is like "are u ****ing kidding me?"
Not sure what you've been watching or paying attention to....but this is 100% incorrect.
Of the top 240 even strength scoring forwards in the NHL, Hank ranks 239th in P/60. He's one of the worst possession players (among forwards) on this Red Wings this season......3rd to last in CF% ahead of just Abdelkader and Glendening. Top 6 production my toosh....he doesn't produce or have the possession of a top 6 player.
He's just simply not a top 6 player anymore. And CERTAINLY not a top line center which is how he's being used now.
Your level of disappointment might be higher for Tatar and Gus and whatever expectations you had for them but neither have been demonstrably worse than Hank. Hank's numbers the 2nd half+ of the season have been horrendous....especially given his minutes and current role on the team.Yeah but... Who did produce like a top 6 forward this year besides Datsyuk? I think you're focused too much on Z and not enough on the guys who are supposedly in their prime and falling way short. Z has been bad, Tatar and Nyquist have been way worse.
And talking about guys being gassed... Larkin is skating at like 50% of his capability right now.