Hockey is a game that is part skill and part luck, too.
The thing is though that whenever he was on the ice, the ice tilted in the Devils favor more often than not.
People like to call Jack Hughes a "game-changer" but I think Bratt may be the low-key "game-changer" here.
If they want to be game changers, they should be better in first two periods. Bratt was very invinsible. He made assists on Holtz, but that goal was on Holtz and on Hart. Bratt starteed to play in third period and it benefits. But for "game-changing" it was too late.
Hughes trying a lot, didn`t find his luck, did made some mistakes, sometimes trying to make best movement and everybody understand what he was actually was trying to do.
I would say we should pull away game changing duties from Bratt, and if he can just create goal chances for himself and for his partners once or twice, it`s enough. He is what he is - very good driver. Other players should doing their job too. Sharangovich was invisible in the first half. Started to play but lost two of his opportunities. He helped with second goal pretty much. But it was done.
Defects here and there, missing opportunities, goalkeeper didn`t keep us, game was lost. Hart kept flyers, they used their opportunities. May be they were not better possession team, but everybody should understand clearly why they won.