Garthinater
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2015
- 2,841
- 1,483
these are such a meaningless points
#1 how many teams in the Cap era have had 4 forwards that were by far the best players on their team. ...most have 2-3 at most and a dman as their best players. So, until there is another team that can say it's 4 best players are all forwards, its impossible to occur.
the 2nd point is a false narrative. players getting paid over 10 million (list from lowest to highest paid) Ovechkin, Burns, Aho, Josi, Rantanen, Backstrom, Vaselvski. ...they may have lower cap hits than 10 mil, but, all are making 10 or more.
Did any GM know that Covid would hit, and create a 'flat cap' for a number of years, when the average growth was 6-8% per year, and now every team in the league is in a cap mess (save 4 bottom dwelling teams).
None of what i said 'defends' Dubas, they are only statements of fact.
You think its meaningless to have 50% of your cap tied up in 4 forwards?
That leaves 50% for a starter goalie + a back up + 6 d + 8 forwards. That is not a recipe for success and that's why no team has won the almost half their cap spent on just 4 forwards.
It shouldn't take a degree to figure out.
I have no clue what point you're trying to make with your 2nd paragraph. No one cares about salary. The only thing that matters is cap hit and none of the players you mentioned make 10 mil or more.
Out of the top 16 highest paid players only 1 won a single round. We have 3 in the top 7. Again, not a recipe for success.
The nhl is a results oriented business. You don't get brownie points for trying hard. You get judged based on your results.
I doubt many gms get to inherit a 105 point team, lose in the first round twice, miss the PO once and still get to keep their job.
Lol your entire post is a pathetic attempt to defend our crappy gm. I'm honestly not suprised you think otherwise.