Value of: Vlasic to Montreal

Legend123

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
9,926
5,112
Vlasic isn't available but even if he was, it would cost you at a minimum Galchenyuk and probably Sergachev as well. Whatever you could possibly think is likely an overpayment is probably what it would start at for San Jose to consider moving Vlasic.

As much as I value Vlasic, I certainly cant value him as much as Galchenyuk. Adding Sergechev is crazy.
 

Legend123

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
9,926
5,112
At least not for those garbage proposals.The Habs aren't a good trading partner, with anyone, really

No high end prospects and
a very , very late no. 1

What would any team really want? Unless you start with a player like Galchenyuk, or Gallagher

After that.......not much that could get you a player like Vlasic, or others of his stature

Why ppl gotta come up with such bad statements when regarding the habs lol
No high end prospects?? Who is Sergechev?
Other than the gallies, the habs have nothing?? Really?? Im 100% sure Weber, Price, Patches, Radulov, Petry would all be very enticing to the Sharks. Then u add in solid prospects/rookies like Juulsen, Sherback, McCarron, Lehkonen and the habs can easily make a trade with every non-divisional team in this league.
 

Classic Devil

Spirit of 1988
Dec 23, 2003
39,365
4,094
Columbus, Ohio
Slow down there, bud. No it very wouldn't:

MTL

Galchenyuk
Sergachev

SJ

Vlasic

Who do you think is getting screwed there? My offer would probably be more along the lines of:
Juulsen/Beaulieu + enticing forward prospect (McCarron/Scherbak) + 2nd/3rd
OR Juulsen/Beaulieu + late 1st
But that's only viable if Vlasic is on his way out and is being shopped on the market; he isn't, OP just wants him. San Jose does better to keep him along with their cup contending core for at least this year.
For Vlasic, Sergachev and Galchenyuk sounds pretty close to fair.
 

Classic Devil

Spirit of 1988
Dec 23, 2003
39,365
4,094
Columbus, Ohio
For 2 years of Vlasic? Yea, no.

Sergachev is the starting piece but Galchenyuk most definitely won't be the add.
From San Jose's perspective? You're asking for a Stanley Cup contender's #1 defenseman in the tail end of their window to actually win. If you're not overpaying, you're not getting what you asked for.

Would San Jose do it for anything less? I don't think so. Even Sergachev and Galchenyuk is questionable as it doesn't really help San Jose win this year.
 

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,877
6,437
Montreal
From San Jose's perspective? You're asking for a Stanley Cup contender's #1 defenseman in the tail end of their window to actually win. If you're not overpaying, you're not getting what you asked for.

Would San Jose do it for anything less? I don't think so. Even Sergachev and Galchenyuk is questionable as it doesn't really help San Jose win this year.

Moving Galchenyuk doesn't make sense for us because we don't have a replacement for him (he's a young 1C..). In any case that's terrible value for us, because like i said we're not guaranteed to resign Vlasic after his 2 years are up and he'll be 31/32. His next contract is going to take him into the later stages of his career.

If SJ moves Vlasic that means they're going to be rebuilding, my offer would be Sergachev + McCarron/Beaulieu + 1st, if that's not enough then so be it.. but we certainly can't create holes at other spots on our roster (if we want to contend).
 

Classic Devil

Spirit of 1988
Dec 23, 2003
39,365
4,094
Columbus, Ohio
Moving Galchenyuk doesn't make sense for us because we don't have a replacement for him (he's a young 1C..). In any case that's terrible value for us, because like i said we're not guaranteed to resign Vlasic after his 2 years are up and he'll be 31. His next contract is going to take him into the later stages of his career.

If SJ moves Vlasic that means they're going to be rebuilding, my offer would be Sergachev + McCarron/Beaulieu + 1st, if that's not enough then so be it.. but we certainly can't create holes at other spots on our roster (if we want to contend).
I never said the deal made sense for Montreal, just that given Montreal was approaching San Jose for the purposes of this hypothetical, that's what San Jose would ask for. Montreal would quite rightly say no.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,130
26,317
As much as I value Vlasic, I certainly cant value him as much as Galchenyuk. Adding Sergechev is crazy.

Wait you think Galchenyuk has more value than Vlasic? There's no way Galchy's value is higher than Vlasic's, which is really a testament to how damn good Vlasic really is.
 

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,877
6,437
Montreal
Wait you think Galchenyuk has more value than Vlasic? There's no way Galchy's value is higher than Vlasic's, which is really a testament to how damn good Vlasic really is.

He doesnt but moving him means we'd be creating a massive hole at center (which is already a big problem that we have).
 

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,877
6,437
Montreal
2 years of Vlasic is not worth more than Galchenyuk.

Even tho Galchenyuk is an RFA this is still his last year, he'll be getting a big raise aswell. He's a guaranteed signing (well most likely) but he's gonna be pricier than he is now.
 

mikeyp24

Registered User
Jun 28, 2014
5,959
1,231
From a outsider perspective the sharks would need the young Russian D and Gally at C for it to make sense. Vlasic is top tier D and replacing him is not easy especially because the 2nd best sharks D is a Ufa after the year and is in his early 30s but will still demand big cash that the sharks might not want to pay. So the risk of losing 2 key defense they need to make sure it is worth it for them. The Habs don't have great prospects other then Serg and they don't have many guys with the big club worth asking for. The guys you do have that the sharks might want are likely not being moved because they were just brought in or to valuable like price radulov and weber. Sharks don't need patches and that just leaves Gally who is a guy who can help replace jumbo joe.
 

Kingspiracy

Registered User
Nov 13, 2006
6,372
2,526
Vlasic is awesome, he is an underrated Dman and an essential part of the Sharks team. It would take more than these offers to entice the Sharks to move him.

Look what happened to the sharks when (was it) stoll rubbed his face along the boards in the playoffs a few years back.
 

CrypTic

Registered User
Oct 2, 2013
5,069
81
A Stanley Cup before Thornton and Marleau retire.

This is correct. We need a Stanley Cup ASAP. So before you make any offer, keep that in mind. We don't need prospects or picks, we need players that can help us win now.

Because of that, I don't think the Habs and Sharks make good trading partners. Add to that that not many players on the Habs interest me:
Price (we'd need to ship a couple of contracts back to fit him under the cap),
Weber (you'd need to retain so we could fit him on the team),
Galchenyuk,
Patches (with a big plus) but I wouldn't take him as the centerpiece of a Vlasic trade.
Some of your prospects are interesting but I'm not interested in prospects for Vlasic

Even Galchenyuk plus Sergachev would give me pause bc I think trading Vlasic for Galchenyuk (plus) would make us at least a bit worse this year and this year (and every remaining year that he's still good) might be the last year Jumbo is good. Galchenyuk might eventually replace Joe but, unless he improves a lot this year, he's not doing it now. From that list, I think the Habs would only be interested in trading Patches which wouldn't work at all from the Sharks' POV.

In short: anything that I'd consider from the Habs would probably piss off most Habs' fans.
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
Slow down there, bud. No it very wouldn't:

MTL

Galchenyuk
Sergachev

SJ

Vlasic

Who do you think is getting screwed there? My offer would probably be more along the lines of:
Juulsen/Beaulieu + enticing forward prospect (McCarron/Scherbak) + 2nd/3rd
OR Juulsen/Beaulieu + late 1st
But that's only viable if Vlasic is on his way out and is being shopped on the market; he isn't, OP just wants him. San Jose does better to keep him along with their cup contending core for at least this year.

So parts for a #1. Parts you're willing to part with that they don't want for a centerpiece they aren't willing to move and have no desire to.

Always, always start with the best 1 for 1 you can come up with as a fan...then add from your side. If you can't do that, you're making a bad offer.
 

Limekiller

Registered User
May 16, 2010
3,886
514
SF Bay Area
He doesnt but moving him means we'd be creating a massive hole at center (which is already a big problem that we have).

Oh sure. No Sharks fan has said that we think that an offer starting at Galchenyuk + Sergachev is one that Montreal would or even SHOULD make for Vlasic. We're just stating the fact that given our team situation and needs that that's the ONLY starting point for an offer that wouldn't result in Doug Wilson laughing derisively as he hangs up the phone.

Remember, Vlasic is arguably the best defensive D-man in the NHL today, and has been adding a growing offensive component to his game as well. All while signed to a deal that pays him $1m less AAV than Dennis Wideman. Given that the team's entire focus is winning a Cup within the next year or two, we have zero interest in virtually any prospect or pick for a player that is such an integral part of our team. As a result, any price that SJ would even consider accepting is one that Montreal simply wouldn't be willing to pay.

So, while no player is truly untouchable, suffice it to say there's zero chance SJ could be enticed into trading Vlasic to Montreal for parts, and that we make terrible trading partners for a deal of this kind.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,948
21,779
MN
How about... Habs give up great pieces on very cheap cap hit

Mtl: Couture, Vlasic

Sj: Patches, Beaulieu

You gotta be kidding me, right? In what twisted little Bleu, Blanc , Rouge universe is this anywhere near realistic?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad