Pierre from Orleans
Registered User
- May 9, 2007
- 27,325
- 19,775
It's pretty sad and cringeyI like this gimmick of pretending that none of the issues with the team Pierre Dorion built have anything to do with Pierre Dorion.
It's pretty sad and cringeyI like this gimmick of pretending that none of the issues with the team Pierre Dorion built have anything to do with Pierre Dorion.
Eh, we probably can't sign Tarasenko without the NMC, I really don't blame Dorion for giving him it.Chock up another bad one on Dorion. That NMC really gummed up the works and imagine they even had to take back salary (mostly because of cap value) to get such poor return. The sharks know where the best feeding spots are.
Eh, we probably can't sign Tarasenko without the NMC, I really don't blame Dorion for giving him it.
The return sucks, I guess we could have threatened to leave him to play out the year in Ottawa, which of course would have just resulted in people complaining that we could have had a second had we only traded him not realizing that the best offer was a 3rd and 4th.
Id have hoped that he'd have been open to a couple options to allow us a decent return, but oh well.
If this is the kind of trash offer we are getting for Chychrun, he isn't getting moved at the deadline.
Not trading Tarasenko and then letting him walk for nothing would have been indefensible. I'm sure Staios got the highest picks available to him.
Unfortunately the situation worked out very poorly, but that's just life as an Ottawa Senators fan.Tarasenko was a good soldier and an effective player for the Senators and some are wondering why the organization didn’t just keep him? The reality is the club was willing to have discussions on an extension with his camp, but he had no plans to stay here and wasn’t going to sign.
Bruce suggests the Sens tried to engage Tarasenko in extension talks but the player was having none of it...
Unfortunately the situation worked out very poorly, but that's just life as an Ottawa Senators fan.
Strange. He was willing to sign for Dorion, but not Staios?
I kind of thought you'd cool it with the bad takes after your unfailing support of Dorion has been proven objectively and hilariously wrong, but here we still are.Strange. He was willing to sign for Dorion, but not Staios?
I agree. I doubt Staios turned down a better offer.Not trading Tarasenko and then letting him walk for nothing would have been indefensible. I'm sure Staios got the highest picks available to him.
He was willing to sign for one season with a full NMC so he could get out of dodge at the deadline with full control over his destination.
Didn't it leak that Dorion offered him a 4x5M deal in July and he turned it down only to circle back when all other offers had dried up?
It's time to look for players that fit into an actual team that can win games. Dorion was a name chaser who wanted TSN.ca headlines, and it failed miserably.
Chychrun needs to go next.
He was willing to sign for one season with a full NMC so he could get out of dodge at the deadline with full control over his destination.
Didn't it leak that Dorion offered him a 4x5M deal in July and he turned it down only to circle back when all other offers had dried up?
It's time to look for players that fit into an actual team that can win games. Dorion was a name chaser who wanted TSN.ca headlines, and it failed miserably.
Chychrun needs to go next.
Man Staios has to get a 2nd for Tank.
The thing I can't seem to wrap my head around was what the retention got us in this trade.
Was it the condition on the 4th? The 4th itself? Would we have gotten 2 4ths with no condition without it?
Any thoughts on the value of the retention we provided?
You're ignoring that the only people who want to play in Ottawa have ties to the area.
There is an argument to make that PD could have utilized the cap space to add futures as well as NHL bodies, which has been a valid argument every single summer... but I personally feel that is nitpicking and would not have really been any better than how things have unfolded.Eh, we probably can't sign Tarasenko without the NMC, I really don't blame Dorion for giving him it.
But if the rumours are true and Tank basically forced his way to Florida, and Florida basically responds that they're not that interested and will offer no more than a 3rd + 4th, I'm not sure what else there is to do.I don't know how you don't put your foot down and tell a divisional rival that if they want a legit top 6 forward they'll need to give up a late 2nd next season at the very least.
It's an embarrassing return. Signals to the rest of the league that when backed into a corner you'll settle for a crap offer instead of insisting on a fair return.
Doesn't bode well for Chychrun offers.
Retaining 50% on a 5M contract as a third team is worth around the 4th round pick we got.
So yeah it was basically Tarasenko for a late 3rd round pick a year from now.
Not a great sign that our rookie GM is up to the job, frankly.
Didn't it leak that he turned down an offer with Carolina to sign with us?
But if the rumours are true and Tank basically forced his way to Florida, and Florida basically responds that they're not that interested and will offer no more than a 3rd + 4th, I'm not sure what else there is to do.
But if the rumours are true and Tank basically forced his way to Florida, and Florida basically responds that they're not that interested and will offer no more than a 3rd + 4th, I'm not sure what else there is to do.
I would say if Florida was the only destination, If wait Florida might move on to another player, before Friday, then you have nothing I guess.If this trade were made on Friday afternoon, I would feel differently about it. At that point you truly are down to "light return" or "no return", and I can understand sucking it up and accepting the light return for the reasons you mention (the Dorion handcuffs and goodwill benefits). But 48 hours out from the deadline, there is still a third potential outcome, which is that Florida comes back with a better offer. They might be saying this is last and final, but for Tarasenko at 50% retained, Staois doesn't have to believe them.
By settling for this trade today he banks goodwill with the players, which is absolutely a positive. But he also loses the flexibility of that retention slot (which can be used to get a mid round pick), and he signals to rest of the league that he is a negotiator who'll cave on price rather than walk away if he doesn't get what he considers acceptable.
Let's just hope Florida wins the cup and then we get two thirds. Maybe we can trade those thirds for a 2nd? Who knows how it all pans out. Either way, it was fun while it lasted, but I'm glad to see Tarasenko in another jersey.Eh, we probably can't sign Tarasenko without the NMC, I really don't blame Dorion for giving him it.
The return sucks, I guess we could have threatened to leave him to play out the year in Ottawa, which of course would have just resulted in people complaining that we could have had a second had we only traded him not realizing that the best offer was a 3rd and 4th.
Id have hoped that he'd have been open to a couple options to allow us a decent return, but oh well.
If this is the kind of trash offer we are getting for Chychrun, he isn't getting moved at the deadline.
As much as I agree with everything you've posted, I'd rather have some of the picks than nothing. We can't afford to lose players to FA for nothing given how empty our cupboards areI don't know how you don't put your foot down and tell a divisional rival that if they want a legit top 6 forward they'll need to give up a late 2nd next season at the very least.
It's an embarrassing return. Signals to the rest of the league that when backed into a corner you'll settle for a crap offer instead of insisting on a fair return.
Doesn't bode well for Chychrun offers.
Retaining 50% on a 5M contract as a third team is worth around the 4th round pick we got.
So yeah it was basically Tarasenko for a late 3rd round pick a year from now.
Not a great sign that our rookie GM is up to the job, frankly.