Blue Jays Discussion: Vladdy named ASG MVP. Draft Over. Now all that's left is the trade deadline

Status
Not open for further replies.

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,420
3,072
Why? Is being a fan getting in the way of your observational skills? All I did was say I don't think this team is very clutch right now. And then "boom!" fantastic example exhibited in the next game. But that doesn't count because "No, not VLADDY! Anyone but Vladdy!".

Or is merely pointing out this team's offense isn't very clutch enough to lure out all of the defensive whiners? And why is the idea of a young player not being experienced enough to be reliably clutch seem odd to any of you? It's downright common sense. It usually takes a few years before young players, even offensive juggernauts, become more reliable.

And I hardly blame just Vladdy. Most of the guys so far haven't been all that great. They look good when they're crushing bad pitching but not so much against good pitching. Not really terrible, just kinda average. That's why I asked if there was any stat showing the Jays performance against elite pitching, but no, just more of the usual defensiveness. But, hey, you guys have no trouble crapping all over Matthews and Marner.

Great, is this another one of those forums where people deny all substantiated arguments because they're too fanboyish to accept any kind of criticism? I thought a forum where they have no trouble criticizing the Leafs would be more open than this.



Never said it was. Period.
Please stop. First this particular thread is for Jays. We aren’t all leafs fans here. Please stop saying clutch. It’s about as bad an argument as one can make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stickty111

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,708
8,632
How is he even in the majors at all? Jays need to start drafting more clutch guys

How Ryan Goins has become the Blue Jays' Mr. RISP this season - Sportsnet.ca

upload_2021-7-20_9-26-24.jpeg
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,256
6,619
Great, is this another one of those forums where people deny all substantiated arguments because they're too fanboyish to accept any kind of criticism? I thought a forum where they have no trouble criticizing the Leafs would be more open than this.

Do you know what the word "substantiated" means? Because you haven't "substantiated" a single claim you've made about the team's "clutch" hitting.
 

metafour

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
1,836
689


Jaden Rudd was confirmed by Carlos Collazo a few days ago, but MLB Pipeline is just picking it up now as well:

 

TGB

Registered User
Jun 7, 2021
757
259
Yep. It's one of those forums. Made all sorts of calls so far-hell, their draft mirrored my suggestions for what moves they should make at the trade deadline; nobody EVER correctly predicts draft results-but nah, gotta protect those millionaires from minor criticism!

Do you know what the word "substantiated" means? Because you haven't "substantiated" a single claim you've made about the team's "clutch" hitting.

Oh, look. Denial. Right on time.

Anyway, here's your reminder: 6 runners left on base with 2 strikeouts. And nevermind all those times he grounded into double plays with the bases loaded recently, or Hernandez and Grichuk striking out on pitches 2 feet out of the strike zone with a runner on third in the bottom of the tenth. And, oh yeah, absolutely crushed in the playoffs last year.

More than enough to lend some credence to the idea that this team looks an awful lot like the Leafs.

What's the argument here exactly?

Are we picking on Vlad's .405/.519/.810 with RISP? His mere .361/.465/.750 with RISP/2 outs? Or his shameful .340/.469/.560 in 'high leverage' sitations?

No, we're not. That's the straw man you're all using because it's easier than actually addressing my points. I've never said Vlad is a bad hitter. I just said he's not as great as you guys think he is since there have been many games where he went ham against bad pitching, as has much of the team. When it really mattered, and against great pitching, the team hasn't been all that great. I can't remember a game recently where they manufactured and clawed their way back from a deficit to win. Usually when they do that it's because the other team committed a bunch of errors.

All I'm saying here is this team has crushed bad pitching SO FREAKIN' HARD that it's giving the illusion that they're much better offensively than they really are, a result born out by their actual record against good teams and when performing in the clutch against much better pitching. But you guys are too busy being offended fanboys to even consider the possibility. "STATS!" you repeatedly shout at me like a mantra. Yes, I'm well aware you guys know what the stats SAY, but do any of you know what they MEAN?

Of course, it's not like the team won't get better. It could happen in just the next month especially with daddy Bichette given them hitting advice that has clearly proved to be working for the most part.

Interesting how you guys danced around my point about young players usually needing more experience before they're more consistently clutch. But of course that would require you all to actually read and address my points, heh.


Too speculative to be relevant. Dismissed.
 
Last edited:

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
27,217
34,091
Yep. It's one of those forums. Made all sorts of calls so far-hell, their draft mirrored my suggestions for what moves they should make at the trade deadline; nobody EVER correctly predicts draft results-but nah, gotta protect those millionaires from minor criticism!



Oh, look. Denial. Right on time.

Anyway, here's your reminder: 6 runners left on base with 2 strikeouts. And nevermind all those times he grounded into double plays with the bases loaded recently, or Hernandez and Grichuk striking out on pitches 2 feet out of the strike zone with a runner on third in the bottom of the tenth. And, oh yeah, absolutely crushed in the playoffs last year.

More than enough to lend some credence to the idea that this team looks an awful lot like the Leafs.



No, we're not. That's the straw man you're all using because it's easier than actually addressing my points. I've never said Vlad is a bad hitter. I just said he's not as great as you guys think he is since there have been many games where he went ham against bad pitching, as has much of the team. When it really mattered, and against great pitching, the team hasn't been all that great. I can't remember a game recently where they manufactured and clawed their way back from a deficit to win. Usually when they do that it's because the other team committed a bunch of errors.

All I'm saying here is this team has crushed bad pitching SO FREAKIN' HARD that it's giving the illusion that they're much better offensively than they really are, a result born out by their actual record against good teams and when performing in the clutch against much better pitching. But you guys are too busy being offended fanboys to even consider the possibility. "STATS!" you repeatedly shout at me like a mantra. Yes, I'm well aware you guys know what the stats SAY, but do any of you know what they MEAN?

Of course, it's not like the team won't get better. It could happen in just the next month especially with daddy Bichette given them hitting advice that has clearly proved to be working for the most part.

Interesting how you guys danced around my point about young players usually needing more experience before they're more consistently clutch. But of course that would require you all to actually read and address my points, heh.



Too speculative to be relevant. Dismissed.
Good for you to realise your argument was wrong, and didn't provide much substance.
 

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
Yep. It's one of those forums. Made all sorts of calls so far-hell, their draft mirrored my suggestions for what moves they should make at the trade deadline; nobody EVER correctly predicts draft results-but nah, gotta protect those millionaires from minor criticism!



Oh, look. Denial. Right on time.

Anyway, here's your reminder: 6 runners left on base with 2 strikeouts. And nevermind all those times he grounded into double plays with the bases loaded recently, or Hernandez and Grichuk striking out on pitches 2 feet out of the strike zone with a runner on third in the bottom of the tenth. And, oh yeah, absolutely crushed in the playoffs last year.

More than enough to lend some credence to the idea that this team looks an awful lot like the Leafs.



No, we're not. That's the straw man you're all using because it's easier than actually addressing my points. I've never said Vlad is a bad hitter. I just said he's not as great as you guys think he is since there have been many games where he went ham against bad pitching, as has much of the team. When it really mattered, and against great pitching, the team hasn't been all that great. I can't remember a game recently where they manufactured and clawed their way back from a deficit to win. Usually when they do that it's because the other team committed a bunch of errors.

All I'm saying here is this team has crushed bad pitching SO FREAKIN' HARD that it's giving the illusion that they're much better offensively than they really are, a result born out by their actual record against good teams and when performing in the clutch against much better pitching. But you guys are too busy being offended fanboys to even consider the possibility. "STATS!" you repeatedly shout at me like a mantra. Yes, I'm well aware you guys know what the stats SAY, but do any of you know what they MEAN?

Of course, it's not like the team won't get better. It could happen in just the next month especially with daddy Bichette given them hitting advice that has clearly proved to be working for the most part.

Interesting how you guys danced around my point about young players usually needing more experience before they're more consistently clutch. But of course that would require you all to actually read and address my points, heh.



Too speculative to be relevant. Dismissed.

That’s a lot of words to say that you don’t know what you’re talking about
 
  • Like
Reactions: kb and stickty111

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,420
3,072
Yep. It's one of those forums. Made all sorts of calls so far-hell, their draft mirrored my suggestions for what moves they should make at the trade deadline; nobody EVER correctly predicts draft results-but nah, gotta protect those millionaires from minor criticism!



Oh, look. Denial. Right on time.

Anyway, here's your reminder: 6 runners left on base with 2 strikeouts. And nevermind all those times he grounded into double plays with the bases loaded recently, or Hernandez and Grichuk striking out on pitches 2 feet out of the strike zone with a runner on third in the bottom of the tenth. And, oh yeah, absolutely crushed in the playoffs last year.

More than enough to lend some credence to the idea that this team looks an awful lot like the Leafs.



No, we're not. That's the straw man you're all using because it's easier than actually addressing my points. I've never said Vlad is a bad hitter. I just said he's not as great as you guys think he is since there have been many games where he went ham against bad pitching, as has much of the team. When it really mattered, and against great pitching, the team hasn't been all that great. I can't remember a game recently where they manufactured and clawed their way back from a deficit to win. Usually when they do that it's because the other team committed a bunch of errors.

All I'm saying here is this team has crushed bad pitching SO FREAKIN' HARD that it's giving the illusion that they're much better offensively than they really are, a result born out by their actual record against good teams and when performing in the clutch against much better pitching. But you guys are too busy being offended fanboys to even consider the possibility. "STATS!" you repeatedly shout at me like a mantra. Yes, I'm well aware you guys know what the stats SAY, but do any of you know what they MEAN?

Of course, it's not like the team won't get better. It could happen in just the next month especially with daddy Bichette given them hitting advice that has clearly proved to be working for the most part.

Interesting how you guys danced around my point about young players usually needing more experience before they're more consistently clutch. But of course that would require you all to actually read and address my points, heh.



Too speculative to be relevant. Dismissed.
There is so much fail here it’s incredible. No one is dodging your false claims. They have proven you wrong with statistical evidence and your “proof” is individual games where a player didn’t get a hit. Vlad is essentially one of the best hitter in baseball right now if not the best. But you think he isn’t because he struck out a couple of times with men on base. Does that make the guys that got on way better than Vlad because they did have success in their at bats? Like your argument is so so so bad. But hopefully his clutchness will increase with age. But just as an aside. Players tend to not do as well against better because get ready for this. They are better pitchers and subsequently that makes them harder to hit against
 
  • Like
Reactions: stickty111

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,492
3,758
Milton
Pretty big piece of news and dramatic statement to say he's not trending towards being a starter again but I guess we'll see how the future pans out. That's the reality for some of these electric arms with fitness issues i.e Merryweather. A bit depressing but oh well, we could use a big arm like that in the pen
 

Deebo

Registered User
Jan 28, 2005
8,350
1,850
Toronto
Pretty big piece of news and dramatic statement to say he's not trending towards being a starter again but I guess we'll see how the future pans out. That's the reality for some of these electric arms with fitness issues i.e Merryweather. A bit depressing but oh well, we could use a big arm like that in the pen

This tweet has a different tone:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad