Ghost vol. 2? Who knows. A lot of money for an offensive "defense"man.
Sure, but they're still actually dmen. Not "dmen".Most top-tier defensemen these days are "offensive" defensemen though...
Ghost vol. 2? Who knows. A lot of money for an offensive "defense"man.
Agreed, he is great at that. I suppose we'll see how his game rounds up.Ghost @ 20 yrs old- Union College
Hughes @ 19 yrs old- 53 pts in 68 games NHL
Even if you think Hughes is just an "offensive dman" he's an elite/franchise "offensive dman"
Agreed, he is great at that. I suppose we'll see how his game rounds up.
7.85 mil*If his game ever rounds up and he becomes a complete Dman then 7mil is going to be one of the biggest steal of a contract in the NHL.
As of now 7mil is a good deal for an elite offensive dman.
It seems like he has been around forever, but lets not forget that Hughes is 21 yrs old!
He doesnt even have his man strength yet.
How come Dahlin is equally as bad defensively, while being incredibly sheltered, whereas Hughes is not (80% QOC vs 23%) and doesn't get shit on like Hughes does?
Hughes is a premier offensive defenseman that fills those categories in every way you can think of (controlled passes out of d-zone, controlled entries into o-zone, primary assists, PP production).
Dahlin is none of those things, and yet 6x3 is reasonable, but 7.85x6 is not? Dahlin is expected to improve defensively, but Hughes is not?
Nah ,he can. Don't kid yourself. The guy played over 60 minutes his last playoff game and didn't sweat it.Not very well, and gets offence propped up by McDrai
Vancouver will always be one of Canada’s most desirable places to play, people need to stop taking EPs comment and twisting it into something it wasn’t.Nah ,he can. Don't kid yourself. The guy played over 60 minutes his last playoff game and didn't sweat it.
I think Hughes is overpaid for what he brings overall, but it's not "that bad"
Van has just started becoming this place not many guys want to play in or will not take a discount. That's mainly on ownership and management. EP40 is the prime example.
I see Hughes putting up decent offensive numbers and getting sh** on defensively. He get's wrecked half of the time you see him back there.
It’s buying a UFA year.That is a bit of a high number... but he is a super-talented offensive blue-liner who is just about to enter his prime, and this is buying UFA years, so I get Vancouver doing this.
He just needs a competent partner that covers for him when he rovers in the offensive zone. I think it's a good contract Hughes will hit 70 pts at some point. I've never seen a Canucks defenseman with the creativity that Hughes has so its hard not to be excited to have him inked for 6 years.
If Jack puts up another 30 pt season then New Jersey is going to have to add to that trade for Miller.This is a reasonable deal; next season lets try to trade Miller and acquire Jack Hughes so we can reunite the brothers
Hot take here 8m for a dman that can't play defensive is just too much.
At least the age balance it I guess
Gonna be a couple decades atleast for someone with clearly that little testosterone to begin with.If his game ever rounds up and he becomes a complete Dman then 7mil is going to be one of the biggest steal of a contract in the NHL.
As of now 7mil is a good deal for an elite offensive dman.
It seems like he has been around forever, but lets not forget that Hughes is 21 yrs old!
He doesnt even have his man strength yet.
If his game ever rounds up and he becomes a complete Dman then 7mil is going to be one of the biggest steal of a contract in the NHL.
As of now 7mil is a good deal for an elite offensive dman.
It seems like he has been around forever, but lets not forget that Hughes is 21 yrs old!
He doesnt even have his man strength yet.