Based on this proposal, the OP isn’t a hockey fan. Or hasn’t been in 7 years.The OP is not a Kings fan
Based on this proposal, the OP isn’t a hockey fan. Or hasn’t been in 7 years.
Doughty for Horvat + Quinn Hughes.
The F?
Alright it you wanna claim that weak lie show some proofI don't see anything wrong with that offer.
Most Vancouver and Kings fans already agreed to the trade.
As long as the trade is done before the season starts, there shouldn't be any problem
Sean walker for Micheal DiPietro and a 3rd
Most Vancouver and Kings fans already agreed to the trade.
Yeah...thats not even close to being true.
I know by responding to this, I am contributing to it continuing to live here, but how the hell is this still a thread? Just wow
No disrespect honestly, but this is probably the worst proposal I have seen in yearsHughes and Horvat to LA
Doughty to Vancouver
Gets Vancouver a long term upgrade on Hughes.
LA gets younger and sheds salary.
I don't see anything wrong with that offer.
Most Vancouver and Kings fans already agreed to the trade.
As long as the trade is done before the season starts, there shouldn't be any problem
Kings fans are also excited for my Erik Johnson + JT Compher for Byfield + Clarke offer.I don't see anything wrong with that offer.
Most Vancouver and Kings fans already agreed to the trade.
As long as the trade is done before the season starts, there shouldn't be any problem
The thing is Walker isn't really a bottom pairing defenseman to me. He can play higher and play pp mins. He is just stuck behind DRew and Roy Also no one as good as Walker will fall down to where the Vancouver will be able to pick.Ehhhhh... Mikey D is viewed as our future backup after Halak retires, and even now he's our #3. If we want a bottom-4 RD we're still not trading that much, or maybe we could pluck someone off the waiver wire.
Kings fans are also excited for my Erik Johnson + JT Compher for Byfield + Clarke offer.
Avs accept. No takebacks. Done deal.
Don't think it's delusional to say Kings end up as a worse team losing a top shutdown D that can play half the game & replacing with a D that doesn't even PK.Ignore him.
He is a known troll that is not worth responding to.
No one outside of a few delusional Kings fans think this is a remotely fair trade.
Don't think it's delusional to say Kings end up as a worse team losing a top shutdown D that can play half the game & replacing with a D that doesn't even PK.
Some teams just decide running a defense that can't defend is a good idea. Locking up 8-10 in a D that has to be sheltered is a terrible idea.And you are exactly one of the few I am referring to.
Thanks for coming out.