crazychimp
Registered User
Short sample size on Brannstrom so far obviously but curios to know why this guy never stuck with Ottawa, he seems like a solid player that I feel at some point maybe he can be a #4/5.
Confirmed Trade: [VAN/COL] Tucker Poolman (20% retained) and 2025 4th round pick for D Erik Brannstrom
- Thread starter Forge
- Start date
Last year, according to the metrics, the Brannchise was like... Ottawa's second best DEFENSIVE defenseman... but he small and Ottawa like big, no like small, so he no good.
Brannstrom has been... good!
Smooth skater, decent puck handling, and he can pass the puck. He has formed a very solid pairing with Desharnais.
Smooth skater, decent puck handling, and he can pass the puck. He has formed a very solid pairing with Desharnais.
Brookbank
Registered User
- Nov 15, 2022
- 2,336
- 2,182
They had to qualify him for more than he was worth or something
Peter Griffin
Registered User
Brannstrom has been fine addition so far.
- Oct 13, 2018
- 4,463
- 5,253
Brannstrom with 59.09% CF, 62.5% FF tonight, he's been pretty good so far!
Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,817
- 33,706
Honour Over Glory
#firesully
- Jan 30, 2012
- 81,738
- 46,065
Why would it be on the Sens? He wasn't good there. It's mostly due to being let go by them and also being traded by the Avs after a not so good camp after just signing with them, then getting waived to play in the AHL by his third team within a year. Maybe that more than likely lit a fire under his ass to be better?
I despise the blaming of the team or player about this sort of situation. Mostly because a change of scenery has done wonders for a lot of players and gives a lot the kick in the rear they really needed to push themselves more. Also on the flip side, a lot of teams are too stubborn to give the player a change of scenery when it isn't working out, out of fear they will elsewhere and make them look bad because they might be on the cusp of figuring it out if they wait it out (Kaapo in NY, Bennett in Calgary, Forsling, etc etc).
This should end well.Our forsling!
misplacedsensfan
Registered User
Ottawa has Chabot and Sanderson on the left side. They wanted someone more physical on the third pair. They tried Brannstrom on the right but he wasn’t great. I think they wanted to keep him but not at 2.5 m qualifying offer and he wouldn’t take less to stay.
He is a legit good defenseman and could be a top 4 d man on a good team if he is paired with a physical RHD. I was more surprised that no one else in the NHL recognised the opportunity.
Brannstrom had a breif stint in Abbotsford before Canucks recalled him and utterly dominated there - so there is that. You wonder if Canucks defense can go with both Brannstrom and Hughes. Really same type of player although Hughes is a lot better.
He was ok on the Sens, Jake Sanderson showed up and stole his job. He filled in rather well when everyone got hurt and he was given ice time but most games DJ wanted him to be a defensive PK type so it was not meant to be.
He skates well and has a heavy shot, He is just small and gets blasted once and a while, he hops right back up most the time.
Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 23,950
- 15,662
Interesting. Similar development path? Needed to accept he’s a defensive D man first and a guy who gets involved offensively second? When a guy skates as well as Branstrom, he can be a player if he’s smart enough to understand the role his other skills suit best.Our forsling!
- Feb 5, 2010
- 20,978
- 9,873
As others have mentioned the QO was a big factor, I also feel like they felt like Kleven was ready to make the step. Brannstrom may figure it out but he’s an offensive defensmen who doesn’t produce offense. He can aid in possession but he needs sheltered minutes. The metrics on the defensive side looks good though he’s barely been tested defensively. He was starting to look more comfortable defensively but has his limitations on that side of things.
Aves for some reason kept Kylington over this guy. There's a reason the Aves only have an OT win vs Anaheim this season. And they don't own their first round pick.
Some guys just need a good fit.
I don’t think Brannstrom will ever be more than a 6/7 type and he will not be playable in the playoffs but all the Canucks needed was a depth guy.
He certainly sucked in his audition for the Avs so I think both sides can be happy with this deal, which won’t matter very much for either franchise at the end of the day.
I don’t think Brannstrom will ever be more than a 6/7 type and he will not be playable in the playoffs but all the Canucks needed was a depth guy.
He certainly sucked in his audition for the Avs so I think both sides can be happy with this deal, which won’t matter very much for either franchise at the end of the day.
PlayersLtd
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2019
- 1,472
- 1,831
And what Canucks fans haven't even seen yet is that he's the type of guy you just want to pull for, earns a spot in your heart type. Works hard, takes a licking but keeps ticking, good teammate, likeable humble guy, grinds out his career.
Really hope he works out, he deserves it for what the fans and provious management put him through in Ottawa.
Really hope he works out, he deserves it for what the fans and provious management put him through in Ottawa.
Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,817
- 33,706
benfranklin
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2024
- 516
- 408
They both suck. Bransstrom was atrocious in preseason. Maybe it was a master plan to not play for COL because he sure didnt earn a spot.
Quinning
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2008
- 26,983
- 14,532
Brannstrom has been excellent so far. We're not seeing anything Avs fans were seeing.
Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,817
- 33,706
He looks absolutely unbelievable considering how we got him, seriously
Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,817
- 33,706
Freaky Styley
Registered User
Except to the coaching staff/management when guys are fighting for spots? It's become apparent that some guys just don't fit into the Avs system. It's clear Brannstrom is talented but the Avs are overloaded with guys with a similar skill set and he got caved in defensively in his short stint here.
So did Kylington, but they are clearly more committed to him and he's got a longer track record. Waiving Brannstrom allowed Avs to pick up Ludvig, who fills a much more pressing need in the same role and had a much better showing in limited action. It seems to be working out for all parties involved, and I don't think the Avs feel like they've missed out.
frightenedinmatenum2
Registered User
He is perfectly fine in that #7-8D wheelhouse.
In Ottawa, it's that his game never progressed beyond that point and he had a 2M QO.
I don't see him sticking in the NHL beyond this season, but it's nice to see him get another shot somewhere.
Ad
Latest posts
-
Prospect Info: Melvin Fernstrom (RW - Sweden-Jr.) | 93rd Overall 2024 Draft- Latest: Megaterio Llamas
-
-
-
Prospect Info: Sawyer Mynio: 89th Overall 2023 Draft (Seattle) - LD
- Latest: Megaterio Llamas
-
