Confirmed Trade: [VAN/CGY] Elias Lindholm for Andrei Kuzmenko, Hunter Brzustewicz, Joni Jurmo, 2024 1st, cond. 2024 4th

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I dig it.

Kuz is a rebound candidate, and if he does we could get something decent for him at the deadline next year.

Brzustewicz is tearing it up with Kitchener. Jurmo is a huge dude that can skate well. Not a bad couple of defensemen to add to the organization.
 
I wonder what this does for the other rentals. Calgary got that much for a guy who has looked like a ghost all year. I would pay that for a Backlund. MTL is probably going to want a pretty penny for Mony
 
Seems like a win win.

Vancouver got their guy while protecting their best prospects.

Calgary was going to have to either retain or take back a cap dump. Kuz won’t be the guy from last year, but he has a chance to be somewhere in between last years version and this years. That’s a much better dump than other teams would have been offering. Plus they got a solid prospect at a position of need. And a 1st. The 1st and prospect of that quality were a given, but it’s a much better wildcard in Kuz than say the Horvat return.

I still question Vancouver’s depth ability to contribute without a crazy high shooting percentage, but every team has holes and this move clearly helps protect them from any smoke and mirrors wearing off while also giving them a matchup guy that they were lacking. Tip of the hat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot
NHL franchises have analytics departments.

That's not how it works.

His value in a month will be no different than his value right now. You don't think the Canucks were trying to find good value for him?

Teams do still get starry eyed, and teams do still panic when the deadline gets too close.

Even teams with analytics departments (and in my experience, a non-trivial number of teams have analytics departments but don't actually pay attention to them).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Three On Zero
I wonder what this does for the other rentals. Calgary got that much for a guy who has looked like a ghost all year. I would pay that for a Backlund. MTL is probably going to want a pretty penny for Mony

I don’t think it changes much. Vancouver paid high to secure the best forward rental out there early.
 
It's certainly not a bad deal for Calgary. There is probably a bit of overreaction from fans with takes on the extreme edge of either side.

- Kuzmenko isn't talentless. He will probably score some goals for Calgary. But the idea that he's just having a down year is extremely flawed. He rode an absolutely insane shooting % and PDO on a very bad team last year to some gaudy counting stats. He's not suddenly going to be flip-able for a 1st even if he does get hot for the Flames over the next month. He can be a contributer but is he going to move any needle or asset package in the long-run?

- Hunter is not a "throw-in". He and the 1st are the main attractions here. His OHL stats are great. He's certainly increased his stock from 3rd round value last year. He's also heavily flawed when it comes to projecting a "high-end" NHL player down the road.

- The 1st...to me, even if #30 or #31 - that's still the main piece. What Calgary does with it will matter but it was important to get that.

- Lindholm is probably not ever going to be 40-goal Lindholm again but there is track record here, there is elite level defensive play here, there is positional premium here...so to take an extremely lucky Kuz year (I will eat my hat is his 22-23 season isn't a ridiculous outlier in his entire career) and then say Lindholm is a 9 goal center is absurd. He offers the Canucks an elite 2C who let's them keep their mega-line of EP and JTM together while stiching together a bunch of all-weather, all-zone 2nd line possibilities.
Kuzmenko has only been in the league for 1 year lol. He's probably a bit lucky last year just like the Canucks are a bit lucky this year, but he's still a solid 2nd line player. A Burakovsky type with the hands to succeed with enough support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19
Teams do still get starry eyed, and teams do still panic when the deadline gets too close.

Even teams with analytics departments (and in my experience, a non-trivial number of teams have analytics departments but don't actually pay attention to them).

What about Kuzmenko's game strikes you as the type of playoff-performer or rugged, nuts-to-the-wall two-way talent that GM's WILL overpay for come the TDL?

Unless a team is deep, deep in a top six injury crisis - he doesn't fit the mold of "guy I'm willing to overpay for even if I am a dinosaur GM".

Besides, I genuinely think the Flames see him as a guy they want to keep. I sitll think they are trying to thread the needle between "oh crap we signed all these vets" and "we need a future youth movement".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Daddy Cane
Because Lindholm has 9 goals this year and was walking at the end of the season. Kuzmenko is a pretty good bounce back candidate for them as well (see Sharangovich success)
Sharangovich was never straight up bad and healthy scratched. He was very good for NJ before getting bumped down the lineup by their high draft picks
 
  • Like
Reactions: zar
I truly wonder about Lindholm as he has been a ghost this year, he has ONE more goal than Kuzmenko fwiw. He never really produced at a high end clip without Johnny and Chuk, so I am curious how they deploy him in Van. I think he and Petey could be a good duo.
 
I truly wonder about Lindholm as he has been a ghost this year, he has ONE more goal than Kuzmenko fwiw. He never really produced at a high end clip without Johnny and Chuk, so I am curious how they deploy him in Van. I think he and Petey could be a good duo.
Mentally checked out. He will be fine in Vancouver.
 
great deal for calgary, not sure why it happened this far away from the deadline, seems like calgary could have turned some screws later?
 
I truly wonder about Lindholm as he has been a ghost this year, he has ONE more goal than Kuzmenko fwiw. He never really produced at a high end clip without Johnny and Chuk, so I am curious how they deploy him in Van. I think he and Petey could be a good duo.
Who would be the third guy on that line. It would be perrty perrrty soft
 
Love this fit for the Canucks. The ability to change the lineup with an extra bona-fide center option was always going to make more sense than a straight up winger. Especially with the Lotto line being reunited.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad